similar to: cbq configuration is needed

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hi i have configured my server with cbq and gred. The problem is that the cbq doesnt drop packets. The cbq is configured at a rate of 500Kbit "qdisc cbq 4: rate 500000bit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 100103048 bytes 73933 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 24000 undertime 0 " The traffic that being generated is more than 5Mbit with the

If I create a cbq qdisc as a leaf of a cbq class, the bandwith rate is the same of the root cbq qdisc or the rate of the cbq class? Does exist the parameter rate on the "tc qdisc add" for cbq command? tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 10mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:3 cbq bandwidth 10mbit rate 50kbit allot 1514 cell 8

Hi, I''m work on traffic shaping and I would like to know if it''s possible to mix differents Queueing Disciplines ?? I would like to combine the proporties of a PRIO discipline with that of a CBQ discipline. I read some documentation and I found nothing about that, can you help me ? I think to try something like that : tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq … tc class add dev

Hi, In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq. _______ 10.0.2.1 -------> 10.0.2.11(eth0 )----| A

Hello, I'm usign Kernel 2.2.19 with ext3 0.0.7b patches. I'm also using cbq to control bandwidth. The cbq is correctly creating the classes and queueing disciplines but, whenever I call cbq stop I get a kernel panic: > Aiee, killing interrupt handler > Kernel panic: Attempted to kill idle task! > In interrupt handler - not syncing The exact line in cbq script that is

Hi Stef and Alexey I have read some documents about CBQ algorithm from http://www.icir.org/floyd/cbq.html but still have some question about CBQ in Linux . 1. First estimator can estimate how much bandwidth already USED per class. one estimating algorithm is EWMA (exponential weighted moving average), how about Linux implemenatation about estimator? also do you have link for this algorithm? I

Hello, Just wondering, from what I have been reading, would using the word bounded solve my problem? I have not actually tried using bounded yet, I will asap, however from what I understand it only applies to classes? I simply have 2 cbq files, cbq-1200.internal, and cbq-1200.external, both of which are identical except one says eth1 instead of eth0. Within each file I have :

Hi everyone, This is on a linux box, ingress (eth1) at 100Mb/s and egress (eth0) at 10Mb/s. The purpose is to test CBQ Here is my script ------------------------------------------------------------------- # Root qdisc tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 9Mbit \ avpkt 1000 cell 8 # Classes tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 9Mbit \ rate 5Mbit weight

Sub:[LARTC] cbq init for one port on a subnet Hello, We use cbq.init to limit bandwidth. It works great on a per-user basis. Now I''d like to limit traffic from a netblock to the Internet on port 6699. Network is 192.168.0.160 mask 255.255.255.224 eth0 is the gateway eth1 connects the netblock in question Is this the proper syntax; DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=100Kbit

Hello, Does anyone know when one should use cbq versus (simpler more accurate) htb? Specifically does cbq have added functionality that may be of interest to certain applications? from htb home> Both CBQ and HTB help you to control the use of the outbound bandwidth on a given link. Both allow you to use one physical link to simulate several slower links and to send different kinds of

Hi all, Can anyone in this mailing list answer a few theoretical question which r confusing me. Here is the scenario I have a total Bandwidth of 2Mbps for a private LAN I am managing. I am using cbq standard script available online and for controlling bandwidth, squid and iptables. I have diff. packages for client. One: server own services access (unlimited bandwidth means no delays or

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

Ok, this has been kicking my @$$ for weeks. I'm trying to get some kind of bandwidth shaping working on my server. I need to throttle ftp down so as not to suck up all the available bandwidth. I had cbq working on the old server (an ancient RH 6.2 box) so I figured I'd just move the config over and get cbq.init from sf.net and it should work. Unfortunately it doesn't. At least

i start reading for cbq init script but i haven''t it on my linux machine and the tutorials that a read don''t show how to install cbq on linux. sorry for my incopetence but i am in trouble now. any help will be apreciated very much thanks a lot _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

About the cbq.init. Four machines which traffic to limit in same LAN. Is the samething if I put limiting rules to four different files or all to the same file? Like: DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=64Kbit WEIGHT=6Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.168.0.5 RULE=192.168.0.6 RULE=192.168.0.7 RULE=192.168.0.8 OR four equal files with different IPs, Ids and no PARENT rule? What style of ID numbering you use if

I find the negative attitude toward CBQ to be distracting and non-professional in the HOWTO. I''ve re-read it for the first time in about a month and comments like "This can be configured in a variety of ways, which I do not understand. Use HTB" do not encourage me about the writer. This is not a personal critique, as I can imagine this being said on a personal website,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Guys Ive got an internet cafe on which I have a debian sarge box running. The Debian box acts as a gateway and it has masquerading on. I have 40 client PC and i do not want to assign more than 64k per pc for upload and the same is true for download too. Ive done alot of research and Ive read tutorials about CBQ and HTB. I found that CBQ.init is

OK, finally I have made cbq run ! now I would like to know if it is posible to limit a range of IP to a speed. something like this : from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.21 limit to 128K I don''t whant to limit each IP to 128K, what I would like to do is limit all 20 IP to have a max of 128K. Is it posible?

While I''m thinking about that review of howto changes, here are a few other responses about things I don''t believe. I''ll be interested in more info if anyone has any. ==== [from new doc] Besides being classful, CBQ is also a shaper and it is in that aspect that it really doesn''t work very well. It should work like this. I''ve not noticed that it