similar to: ARP queries generating entries in routing cache

Hi Szymon, I have received the files and will take a look and get back to you. In what context are you seeing index? Thanks, Nithya On 11 July 2017 at 01:15, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large > attachments. > Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? > Unfortunately

Hi Nithya, I see index in context: [2017-07-07 10:07:18.230202] E [MSGID: 106062] [glusterd-utils.c:7997:glusterd_volume_rebalance_use_rsp_dict] 0-glusterd: failed to get index I wonder if there is anything I can do to fix it. I was trying to strace gluster process but still have no clue what exactly is gluster index. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nithya

Where did you read 2k IOPS? Each disk is able to do about 75iops as I'm using SATA disk, getting even closer to 2000 it's impossible Il 13 ott 2017 9:42 AM, "Szymon Miotk" <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> ha scritto: > Depends what you need. > 2K iops for small file writes is not a bad result. > In my case I had a system that was just poorly written and it was >

Hi Nithya, the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large attachments. Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? Unfortunately index is popular word, so googling is not very helpful. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at

On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. > Gluster version is 3.7.3. > My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks > to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. > But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. > Rebooting Gluster

Hello! I have access server with 4 uplinks (nice, huh?). I ran RedHat 7.3. Yesterday I did an upgrade to RedHat 9. After upgrade Linux says the third link is bad: # ip route show 2.2.2.0/30 dev eth2 scope link src 2.2.2.2 4.4.4.0/30 dev eth4 scope link src 4.4.4.4 3.3.3.0/29 dev eth3 scope link src 3.3.3.3 1.1.1.0/28 dev eth1 scope link src 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.0/24 dev eth0 scope link

Hi! I got some strange problem with routing loadbalancing. I cannot get the full speed from my ISPs until I get some big files from close ftp server. I have server with one connection to internal network and 3 to ISPs: __________ | eth1|---- ISP1 | | internal--|eth0 eth2|---- ISP2 net | | (~300 | eth3|---- ISP3 hosts

Hello everyone, I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. Gluster version is 3.7.3. My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. Rebooting Gluster nodes doesn't help. # gluster volume rebalance gsae_artifactory_cluster_storage start volume rebalance:

I want to limit each user in my network to have limited bandwidth (let''s say 256/128 kbit). I use NAT (done with iptables). Can I limit users on the outgoing interface using u32 using rules like: tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 17 u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 It seem I made a mistake somewhere or NAT is done before routing and I must use iptables

Hi! I have some problems with htb performance. THE SETUP: I have a network with 3 ISP uplinks and 1 local network uplink. There are about 1700 clients. I was shaping their bandwidth with HTB using iptables mangling in a manner: tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:10 classid 1:${CLASS_ID} htb rate \ 16kbit ceil 512kbit burst 2kb prio 2 quantum 1500 tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:${CLASS_ID}

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72 Summary: ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 Summary: ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo:

Is there a way to distinguish, in the answer of the Dial command, when a channel is not available (for example, an unregistered but valid SIP user) v/s when the dialed channel is inexistent, even when it matches an extension? For example, I've the following simple dial plan: exten => _XX,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},10,) exten => _XX,2,GotoIf(DIALSTATUS = CHANUNAVAIL?4:3) exten =>

Hi, I'm trying a VPN via ssh between Linux (Suse 10.3, 5.0) and OpenBSD (4.2, 4.7). But it doesn't work... On Linux: sudo ssh -v -f -w 0:1 $OPENBSD true sudo /sbin/ifconfig tun0 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 sudo /sbin/route add -net 192.168.17.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev tun0 On OBSD: sudo ifconfig tun1 10.1.1.2 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 sudo /sbin/route add 10.0.3.0/24 10.1.1.1 And add a

You could compile Speex as a DLL (see libspeex_dynamic.dsp) and use PInvoke. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PInvoke Note that Speex will still be executing as unmanaged code and your program will have the added dependency of the native Speex DLL. It appears that someone created a "Speex.NET" based on JSpeex, but I didn't find any useful info on it. You may want to search for this

hey friends, I have installed OpenVPN 2.0.7 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu [SSL] [LZO] [EPOLL] built on Apr 29 2006) on Centos4.0 through rpm (diag repository). The network scenario of my office is below Remote Client ----> Internet <-------> Cisco Pix Firewall (Gateway) <----> VPN Server & LAN Clients

Dear list, I am having a problem with openvpn. I have the following arrangement, running two instances of openvpn on "home fw". I want to protect my WLAN in back of the home fw and that works fine. I can see "Peer connection initiated with 192.168.1.3:5000" in daemon.log on homefw. Nothing gets initiated with officefw, nor can I ping the other end of the tunnel at officefw.

I'm working from modified 5.0p1 codebase. What I'm looking for is a mechanism to limit the number of simultaneous connections on a per-user/IP basis. That is, disallow multiple simultaneous logins/authentication of the same user from different IP addresses. e.g.: fred from 10.1.1.1 - accept fred from 10.1.1.2 -- reject while fred is still connected from 10.1.1.1 fred from 10.1.1.1 - OK

I have multihome network line. I want to use multi gateway, but i have some trouble +-----------------------+ | 30.1.1.1 (eth0) | <----> 10.1.1.1 ( eth1) < ---> internet | | | 10.1.1.2 (eth1) | | | <----> 20.1.1.1 (eth2) < ---> internet | 20.1.1.2

Hello. I am trying to get multi paths running, i.e I want to specify 2 paths from a particular node to another. To test this, I am setting up the following scenario: I create 2 tap devices tap0 = 10.1.1.1/32 netmask 255.255.255.0 tap1 = 10.2.2.2/32 netmask 255.255.255.0 I then issue the route command: ip route add 10.3.3.3/32 nexthop via 10.1.1.2 nexthop via 10.2.2.3 The route table