similar to: ADSL QOS Site

G''Day I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write. HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. In order for this to work, though, do I have to account for the ATM overhead in the small VOIP packets by defining my

https://www.p2pwatchdog.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl > [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl] On Behalf Of Roy > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 5:04 AM > To: Ing. Marcos Salvatierra; James Lista > Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] adsl and p2p programs > > This is most asked question but there is no good

anyone know how to use tc and rrdtool to create queue based graphs? im currently using http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ADSL-optimizer, of which the ddraw.cgi doesnt work properly on debian testing. im looking for graphs like this: http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/graph-shots/12hours/ if anyones done this with adsl-optimizer, or has any suggestions where to start with creating graphs like this, then

Hi, My home setup is as following: - 1024/128 kbit ADSL - FC3 I set up HTB to prioritize traffic. I am not very pleased with the obtained results. The scope of my setup is to have some ssh sessions with remote servers while browsing websites and running aMule Nothing complicated (I think... ;). The very high priority traffic (ssh), gets stuck when I start aMule and make an FTP download.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I''m using HTB to shape my outgoing traffic over a ADSL-link with PPPoE with a nominal bandwidth of 128kbit/s. My goal is to favour small packets like ACKs and interactive services like ssh; in other words, I want to achieve low lantency. If there are some big packets going over the wire, everything works fine. But if there are

Thanks for the tips Brian, Actually, I have many sorts of links, line PPOE ADSL, PPPOA ADSL which a use PPTP over PPOA relay, radio links that connect in the ethernet interface and cable modems. To change the SFQ queue size I must recompile de kernel? I think a saw some messages talking about that. One other thing, I have the 1:10 a 1:20 class, let''s assume there is no

Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which are working great) and we are running NAT. Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what

Hi I have the following problem: I''ve created qos script which shapes traffic on outgoing interface eth1. More - less it looks like this : ------------------------CUT------------------------------------------------------ #root qdisc and class for eth1 $tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 htb default 19 $tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htp ratel ${CEIL_UP}kbit ceil

Hi I''m using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect scheduling. By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead in the scheduling algorithms. http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ADSL-optimizer/ Before trying it, has anyone tried these patches? they apply on 2.4.29 kernel and 2.6.9 TC. I use centos4 with a 2.6 kernel, so I can''t try these easily. Thanks

Greetings list, Thanks to all who replied to my thread a few days ago "SIP devices with packet loss tolerance". One of the suggestions that came out of that thread was to replace routers at users' premises with ones that support QoS. I've used m0n0wall's QoS in the past with reasonable success, but it's quite a bulky and complex setup for deploying to remote sites which

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

HI there Simple question :-) Why there is always only qos examples for upload and not download stream of adsl? I have a linux router which shares 5 wireless "customers" my neighbours and me to one adsl link 512kbps download 128kbps upload ... Now does it make sense to do qos on the linux router for download for us? Say if someone is using ssh from outside ... So I tried to apply the

Hi I share my bandwith (adsl 512/128) between 12 users. I set up simple qos script for incoming (IMQ) and outgoing traffic using htb in root, 4 classess and esfq qdisc at leafs. Interactive traffic goeas to class1 , http,mail etc. to class2, p2p, ftp to class3, and rest to class4. Classess divide link in proportion 20% (prio 1), 40% (prio 2), 20% (prio 3) ,20% (prio 4) This works

It seems Andreas Klauer''s fairnat has experimental support for using HTB''s MPU and overhead options. fairnat.config: # Use MPU for HTB. From the LARTC Howto on MPU: # "A zero-sized packet does not use zero bandwidth. For ethernet, no packet # uses less than 64 bytes. The Minimum Packet Unit determines the minimal # token usage for a packet." HTB_MPU=0 # HTB_MPU=64

Hi, I''ve written a small javascript ADSL throughput calculator: http://nukunuku.yamamaya.is-a-geek.org/~ranma/adsl.html Feel free to submit alternative presets (I currently have presets for three german telecom speed variants: T-DSL (1000|2000|3000), derived from http://www2.lancom.de/kb.nsf/5d445c701b3ff52dc1256e7700297e5c/27c6ee1c3e3f74b0c1256e94004a433e?OpenDocument). Comments,

I have a linux server running Mandrake 10, with the kernel configured with "CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y" options, with 4 ethernet cards: - 2 ethernet used to connect to my lan (eth0=192.168.1.x and eth1=192.168.2.x) - 2 ethernet used to internet connection (2 adsl lines, both with 600/300 kbtis) The two lan are used to share

Sorry all, this is the missing email that I referred to previously. I inadvertently sent it only to the original poster rather than the list. Sorry for the wasted b/w for those who don''t care... Ed W -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] RED/GRED implementation for InBound Traffic Control (from ISP) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 22:04:30 +0100 From: Ed Wildgoose

I''ll take it from the begining... About one year ago I only had 1 IP and used wondershaper. It worked great. Now I got /27 (32 IPs) and a gw computer that talks to two ISPs via a two tunnels. See: http://www.flashdance.cx/pics/flashdance-LAN.png I _really_ have a need to do QoS on my connection, for example I host websites that uses all available upstream. When I download at the same

Heyas, I''m pretty new to this (more new than most of those who say ''I''m new to this''), but I have a basic understanding of what goes on though. [The situation]: A friend of mine has a linux machine running on an ADSL linie. He has given several friends accounts, so they can download faster (a temporary storage), if they are on a modem connection. The linux

Back in 2003/2004 when finding the topic for my masters thesis, I had a secondary project idea, perhaps its about time to do something about the idea, and hear if anyone else thinks its a good idea? The basic idea is to: "Categorize traffic by behavior" The categorization should be based upon things like packet timing characteristics and packet size, rather than standard port