similar to: SNAT and multiply real addresses ?

Anyone to know iproute-save, iproute-restore like script similar iptables-save/restore ? that stores everytihng routes,rules,tables everything ... then init.d-script that among other things stores the state on shutdown :") (thats easy then) ----- http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2004-12-08-004-32-OS-BZ-DT-0005 snip> MS Office is popular in the same way as heart disease is the

Does swfdec work on AMD 64-bit systems? On 3/27/07, D?niel Fraga <fragabr@gmail.com> wrote: > URL: > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2007-03-27-010-26-NW-SW-DV > Free software fans of YouTube jumped for joy last week when developer > Benjamin Otte announced on his blog that the free Swfdec Flash player > has reached the point where it can play YouTube's Flash

hi, Is there benefit of running 2 cpus box for shaper ? ----- http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2004-12-08-004-32-OS-BZ-DT-0005 snip> MS Office is popular in the same way as heart disease is the most popular way to die. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello- This is off-tpoic, but of interest. There's a remote exploit bug on rsync, that was posted on Linux Today. I post this here because apparently it hasn't been mentioned (yet) on the Debian security advisory. The package list is not updated either. Perhaps this is what happened to CRAN when it was cracked... Maybe you admins at CRAN would want to contact the debian-security

Ah, but the interesting thing is that they are coming out with a 'clam' version like the 5MX. Details are limited at the moment, but that could mean the combination of 5MX usability with a supported linux distro. I am drooling in anticipation. Sounds like a "I've finally finished my PhD and deserve a treat" situation to me :) Dave On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:17:20AM

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1227 Bug ID: 1227 Summary: Current conntrack state isn't considered when evaluating multiple SNAT rules Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Hi, I configured a router box to use 2 providers, as described in the HOWTO. (Apendix 1) I want to use both links to reach a single smtp server. As I read in the kptd and in some old messages of this list, doing a SNAT in the postrouting chain comes _after_ the routing desision. So I guess the following lines I''m trying to use are wrong. (See Apendix 1) What can I do to have multiple

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=554 Summary: Packet illegaly bypassing SNAT Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Hi ! I have setup a complete shorewall now with DMZ, and Private zones and masq, rules, port-forwarding etc. worx like expected. BUT I have a wish to use a couple of more public IP''s and relate those to inernal servers on the DMZ zone and i am now so confused about it. I have searched this archive for SNAT port allow Setup: 3 public adresses on the WAN nic. lets call them 80.80.80.80 -

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1225 Bug ID: 1225 Summary: Nft syntax error (snat, dnat using multiple maps) Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

i have a box with 2 real interfaces and one more virtual eth0 - to the internet (193.... eth1 - to the local net (192.168..) tun0 - to another ISP the routing is: all the free/local classes i send them directly on eth0, the rest of the internet i send throw tun0 the admin from tun0 wants me to snat all the packets with my end of the ip-tun0-interface and i snat all the trafic that go to

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763 Summary: dnat and snat not changing port numbers on sctp packets Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Hello all, I have shorewall setup with 3 SNAT entries for external IP address''s to a single IP internal address. I am wondering how to limit access based on the source IP address. ex. EXT IP 1 access only to port 25 EXT IP 2 access only to port 443 EXT IP 3 access only to port 80 I have the SNAT setup correctly and I have 3 accept line in the rules file (25,80,443) but I can hit

I am having problems making RTSP connections to a Windows Streaming Media Server (ie "connecting to media...." but WMP never connects). There are no error messages in /var/log/messages. It was suggested to me that SNAT might perform better than MASQ in this respect. I edited my shorewall/masq file as such: eth0 eth1 12.34.56.78 or should it be? eth0 10.0.0.0/24

Hello, I have a problem with the following setup, I hope you can help me. I have two internet gateways, one for LAN1 and the second for LAN2. +--------------+ GW1 more eth0| |eth4(SNAT) GW2 ---...routers...-----+ router +----------------- | | +---+------+---+ eth1|

Hi, The private adresses (192.168.254.0/255.255.255.0) of my network are sent dynamically by dhcp on my network. The dhcp server is on the firewall which address is 192.168.254.1/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I''ve got a rsync server on this network which is on a separe server. His address is 192.168.254.200/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I want that the users

Has anyone managed to combine bridged network model and SNAT? I have a machine that just ssh''s into other boxes and updates via rsync a copy of their filesystems. I figured I could stage a xen VM for this server with a private IP address and do SNAT and "routing" via the dom0 box, but I get a wierd "Performing cross-bridge DNAT requires IP forwarding to be enabled"

Hi, Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side. my network --- my gateway ---------------------- remote network 10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2) -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22 All traffic starts on my side, so if I can

Hi! Progress is much better now with my new install with not many problems left! I just have a simple - I hope - question. I have a few users that need access to the net via masquerade rules. The rest have to go via squid on the firewall. That all works well. I also have two windows servers that also need access to the net but they have to each use a specific outgoing ip address. I add two

Dear All, I have configured Cluster Suite with 2 servers Server 1 : 192.168.13.110 IP Address Server 2 : 192.168.13.179 IP Address Floating : 192.168.13.83 IP Address (Assumed by currently active server) I want all snmp packets going out through the active server to be stamped with floating IP So i have added a iptables rules as "iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p udp -s