similar to: routing via uplink based on source lan?

I've been playing around a little bit with the "veto files" option for the [homes] shares we have on our Samba servers (2.2.1a & 2.2.3a). I've discovered that: veto files = /.*/ works marvelously for not letting the users muck with their .dotfiles, which is exactly what we want, however, I've also discovered that it also clobbers the special directory entries

I''ve got a serious mess of NAT on our firewall/router systems at the corporate office which seems to do nothing other than confuse the heck out of people. What I''d like to do is gradually migrate the hosts on the various DMZ networks away from private IP addresses and NAT over to public IP addresses and proxyarp. What I''m wondering, before I start this, is how do I

I''m being cast headlong into unfamiliar waters here, and being desperate for some air, thought I''d come here for some help. :) Anyway, my employer is going through some whiplash-inducing growth spurts, and as a result, the simple "Internet T-1 -> Linux Firewall/NAT -> LAN" setup just isn''t going to cut it anymore. First, we''re bringing in 2

Hello there I''m just testing a module (see merging directories) and it is quite involved, in that it: __generic__ 1) creates a user 2) creates a base directory 3) copies generic files (directory with recursion) 4) generate a configuration file from a template 5) creates a symlink __os specific__ 6) copies os specific files (in my scenario two folders, and an init script) 7)

Hello I have few questions regarding tc functionality (qdiscs, classes, etc.) when vlans are in use. For example, consider interface eth0, for which I create and extra vlan with vconfig, let''s say eth0.11. Then using tc I can add usual things - qdiscs, filters, ... - to both eth0 and eth0.11. The questions are: - on which interface - virtual or real, should I actually use tc ? Or

HTB performance improvement Hi all ! i''m looking at the performance of the HTB algorithm/implementation because i would like more packets/sec !! this is the scenario of the performance test: i''m using an embedded system with: SPEED CPU: 399,999 MHz RAM: 128 MByte FLASH: 16 MByte EEPROM: 8Kbyte PROCESSOR MPC8272 a lan to lan 10/100 and in particular we are sending

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No

Hi, I have an ESXi server, on top of it I have created one VM whose IP address is 192.168.79.1. I want to connect to the VM on ESXi server from my host machine but I am not able to do it. I have created a network "networkforSC" and I have pasted my xml file content below but I am not able to add any uplink (how to add it?) . Below is the xml file of my node as well as the network which

Hi everyone, I''m controling the uplink traffic bandwidth between two ethernet linux computers, but it seems like even the download bandwidth gets limited then i''ve got trouble on that because my intention is  shaping the conection on an asymetric way (ADSL).  Lately, I''m going crazy, this problem has got me pretty worried and i''m not figuring out at all, the

I have been testing wondershaper 1.1a with htb. DOWNLINK=2304 UPLINK=1024 DEV=wlan0 No other changes have been made, except to comment out the 2 lines to allow the script to run. When I do a speed test from sites like www.toast.net/performance, I only get speeds equal to my UPLINK speed. I expected a speed closer to the DOWNLINK. Am I missing something here? TIA, -- -Wes Hegge Technical

Hi guys! Im new there, and i havent found yet stories about uplink bandwith limits, and i would like to limit my Exim''s speed, coz its eating my ADSL''s whole uplink. Til now i used the #:~ tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 50kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 command, buts its limiting the whole link:/ I checked the documents on that link:

Hi all, Given below ia the simple network diagram. I need to control uplink for the individual private network IPs as depicted in the diagram. Is this possible in a NATed environment using CBQ or HTB. I learnt that we can control only outgoing traffic. So if I control in the eth1 interface the source IP will be masqueraded, and it may not result in the desired behaviour. Is there a solution to

Hello! I have access server with 4 uplinks (nice, huh?). I ran RedHat 7.3. Yesterday I did an upgrade to RedHat 9. After upgrade Linux says the third link is bad: # ip route show 2.2.2.0/30 dev eth2 scope link src 2.2.2.2 4.4.4.0/30 dev eth4 scope link src 4.4.4.4 3.3.3.0/29 dev eth3 scope link src 3.3.3.3 1.1.1.0/28 dev eth1 scope link src 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.0/24 dev eth0 scope link

Hello, I''m following this HOWTO http://linux-ip.net/html/adv-multi-internet.html to route outgoing SSH from a secondary ISP. I can see using tcpdump,jnettop,iftop that when one of the computers located in my internal network is trying to SSH to a box online using SSH, packets are routed via the secondary internet ethernet card. However, packets don''t seem to know how to get back.

Hello list I have a problem with classifying traffic from two providers, and about 600 users. I have the following situation: P1-\ | linux | --eth0-| box |-eth1 P2-/ | | P1 and P2 are coming from VLANs. I have 4 type traffic which I want to classify. The traffic is divided as follows: P1 - 100mbit from realm 0x70000 10mbit from realm ! 0x70000

Hello all, Just wondering if it can be done? 2 site, 2 linux boxes (1 at each side), each site has 2 internet connections. Can you create a VPN over those connections to utilize both? It would seem like it would need 2 vpn''s (1 for each pair). Any info is appreciated. Sam

I''ve been trying - without success - to aggregate the bandwidth of 3 DSL modems using the instructions in the HowTo (sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2). I _believe_ I''m following the instructions to the letter, but when I add the last command (the "ip route" with "nexthop") then nothing goes out through the modems. Each modem works when I add a single default gateway

Hi all, I have implemented a solution with a machine balancing the network load between two DSL providers as is explained in the LARTC Howto. It is apparently working correctly, but i have some problems. The problem is basically that some packets go out by each ADSL interface with the source address of the other ADSL interface. I think that the routing based on source address isn''t

helo again. I think this question i am asking is worth: we know that pppoe-server creates a pppX device on each connection done to it. So, when i have to shape, i have to shape each pppX connection device on itself alone. What i know is that the borrowing method on one device by itself, e.g. ppp0, alone using HTB or the like. this means that i have to create for another device, e.g. ppp1,

Hi list, I have a problem I thought was simple first, but now I''m stuck. In a nutshell, it''s about redundant uplinks at an outside location. Crude ASCII-Art follows: Internet | | +------------+ | cisco with | | uplinks | +------------+ | | ATM interface +----------+ ... | alvarion | | | wireless