Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "priorizing vlans in a bridge"
2009 Apr 09
1
[Bridge] Out of memory problem
Hi, I'm using linux 2.6.21.5 and our kernel is freeze.
The problem is, if I create a Software bridge using $brctl command. and
add two interfaces say, eth0.0 and eth0.1 using
$brctl addbr br-lan
$brctl addif br-lan eth0.0
$brctl addif br-lan eth0.1
and when i send traffic from a host connected to one port to host
connected at other end, soon all the memory is dried up and and kernel
2005 Mar 08
1
samba WINS problem on 2 networked LANS using a VPN connection
Hello Samba experts,
Please read all email because i'm desperate!!!!!
I have problem on joining to LAN-s using Samba. Finally i got a solution to
"see" booth workgroups on "Entire Network", but i'm having problem with
stations located in LAN2. From any station located in LAN1, I can see LAN2
workgroup and the browse list with stations located in LAN2, but when
2007 Aug 02
5
Allocating 64 kbits/s out of 256 kbits/s for one LAN behing firewall
Hi,
We have a 256 kbits/s (kilobits per second) link to the internet. it is a
router running Linux that belongs to our ISP. They have given us 8 internet
ips. (i.e- subnet is 255.255.255.248). one has been given to this router. I
have given another internet ip to the firewall running CentOS 4.5. iptables
is running on it. And also, I have installed iproute2 pkg as well.
pls see below for
2007 Oct 20
3
bridge or vlan
Hello to everyone,
Here is the situation:
[LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\
| LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet]
[LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/
Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24.
So I need:
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other.
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24).
All LANs have to get only internet.
How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?
2005 May 03
1
Shorewall router behind Shorewall firewall
Dear Friends,
I have been using shorewall for some years.
I want to set up "shorewall 2" router behind firewall,
accordind to this picture:
I have lost at setuping "zone"-s (wifi, lan1, net).
Plese help me !
Thanks, psw
net
|
|
SHOREWALL 1 ------- lan 1
|
|
|wifi
|
|
SHOREWALL 2 ------- lan 2
|
---------------- lan 3
2014 May 30
3
Centos box and Cisco 3750 VLAN's
Hello all,
I have a CentOS box that has a NIC (eth0) on which I defined 4 VLAN's
(counting the NIC itself): eth0, eth0.1, eth0.2 and eht0.3. Initially the
Cisco switch was not partitioned into VLAN's which means that the only VLAN
running on it was the default one (VLAN 1).
I have then played with VLAN's a bit on the switch and at this point have
two: VLAN 1 (which is default and can
2017 Sep 11
1
Will couple of packets drop when in-frequent traffic go through tinc?
An very interesting test did yesterday that, LAN1 and LAN2 setup an tinc VPN which is quite simple(the physical link between tinc nodes are quite stable/fast), and no any application traffic to go through the tinc.
Later, I setup smokeping which LAN1 initial 20 ping to LAN2 on a per-minute basis, but as you saw from the below picture, it had packet drop. But if I perform a constantly ping from
2005 Jun 24
9
WINS across two networks and a router
Hello, everybody. This one''s got me stumped. What I''m trying to do is have
two networks--192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0--with SMB and WINS running between
them. So far I can mount SMB shares allright, but I can''t browse by WINS
names across the router. I''ve posted this question on Linuxquestions.org;
you''ll find the details there.
Here are my
2004 Oct 18
1
Beginer question
Hi, list members.
I''ve been reading a lot about traffic control because
at work we have the following configuration......
LINUX
BOX
_____
100 mbit | |
LAN1--------------|eth0 |
| | 2 mbit SDSL
| eth1|-------------------INTERNET
100 mbit | |
LAN2--------------|eth2 |
| |
-------
The linux box (REDHAT 9-2.4.20-30.9) acts as a firewall-NAT
solution for both
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Freezing bridges
I have the following situation:
A Linux 2.4.22 server:
Physical ethernet:
lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet)
lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port)
Tunnel:
tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode
VLAN's:
lan2.201
lan2.202
lan2.203
tap1.201
tap1.202
tap1.203
Bridges:
br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201)
br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202)
br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203)
On the other end, the same type of server:
2007 Dec 06
3
HTB performance improvement
HTB performance improvement
Hi all !
i''m looking at the performance of the HTB algorithm/implementation because i would like more packets/sec !!
this is the scenario of the performance test:
i''m using an embedded system with:
SPEED CPU: 399,999 MHz
RAM: 128 MByte
FLASH: 16 MByte
EEPROM: 8Kbyte
PROCESSOR MPC8272
a lan to lan 10/100 and in particular we are sending
2006 Mar 15
6
load balancing: per route or per interface?
Hi!
I''m doing load balancing for 5 dsl lines, each one with a dsl router
attached to a linux machine ethernet plug. The problem is that I''m
adding 15 more dsl lines, and I don''t have enough PCI slots in the
linux machine to sum up 20 ethernet plugs (I already have 2 quad
ethernet cards).
So I''m considering connecting all dsl routers and the linux machine to
a
2005 May 10
3
Interconnecting two lans using Asterisk over a PSTN
Hello,
I am a newbie in Asterisk IP PBX but I am very impressed by its
functionalities.
I have read that It can work over IP network and across the PSTN.
I am not very sure how it works over the PSTN..
In case if people have not yet the Internet or SDL access, I would like just to
know if it is possible to interconnect two IP LANs using the traditionnal
analog Network and Asterisk PBX? In such I
2023 Mar 30
2
[Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add dynamic FDB test
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> Not true, it reveals that I forgot to put it in the patch, that's all. As
> I cannot run several of these tests because of memory constraints I link
> the file to a copy in a rw area where I modify the list and just run one
> of the subtests at a time. If I try to run the whole it always fails
> after a couple of
2004 Aug 20
1
trouble with nexthop when I try to load balance
I have two internet lines and I want to do equal cost loadbalancing on the two
uplinks to the internet. This is what I do:
ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 dev eth2 table 200
ip route add default via 200.200.200.254 dev eth2 table 200
ip route add 100.100.100.0/24 dev eth1 table 100
ip route add default via 100.100.100.254 dev eth1 table 100
ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 src 200.200.200.1 dev eth2
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Transparently bridge Vlans to eth0
Hi,
I'm using Vlans in my network as a way of preventing
pier to pier communication - I only want nodes in the
network to talk to the gateway (a linux box).
I have successfully set up lots of sub interfaces
using the vconfig too, one for each vlan. What I would
like to be able to do is remove the ip address from
each of these subinterfaces eth0.x and bridge them to
eth0. I have successfully
2005 May 09
2
vlan traffic shaping.
I couldn''t find anyone who had actually made it work via google so I
guess I''ll ask here.
My setup is a VPN point to point link. The VPN is a modified version of
Openvpn where I''m using zlib compression to improve the compression a
bit.
The goal is to shape traffic coming from a routing server through the
vpn to the endpoint of the vpn and in such a way maximize the
2007 Jun 19
4
Why does this script noet work (bandwidth, tc en u32)
Hi,
Can anyone point me out where the script below is wrong?
All I want is that host 172.31.1.1 can only use 10 megabit. If I run
this script on the in-between router nothing happens (the host uses
still the full 100 mbit, tested with iperf) , so i assume that something
must be wrong....
#!/bin/sh
# LAN1 NIC
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev
2005 Jun 11
1
problem with ip route and multiple lans
Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network
It looks like this:
---- ----- ------
R1 R2 R3
---- ----- ------
| | |
| | |
-------------------------------
ETH1 ETH2 ETH3
ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ
------------------------------
|
|
2006 Dec 05
1
Traffic control on a single interface
I''m in the process of replacing a Novell server that had a single NIC
and routed traffic from our local network to either the Internet or to
the Corporate office. I have this configuration working now but we''ve
run in to some bandwidth problems.
The server that I have set up now is Linux. It uses a different IP for
Samba than for the DNS/DHCP and routing (different VMs in