similar to: Unit test problem -- BetterNestedSet?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Unit test problem -- BetterNestedSet?"

2010 Mar 08
0
betternestedset in rails 3.0
Hi Guys, when i upgraded my rails 2.3.4 to 3.0 my betternestedset is not working. It was working fine in the older version. This is my controller def new cat = Category.new cat.text=''test'' cat.save cat.move_to_child_of(Category.find_by_id(1)) #26 redirect_to :action => ''index'' end It gives me this error : "You cannot move a
2007 Jan 13
0
better nested set 0.1
We are pleased to announce the 0.1 release of the plugin betternestedset. It greatly enhances ActiveRecord''s internal acts_as_nested_set. Install it with: script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/betternestedset/tags/stable/betternestedset Join the mailing list: http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk Report bugs:
2007 Jul 18
10
Rails - Mock going out of scope?
Hello list, I think I have a rails related RSpec problem with a mock going out of scope on a recursive call to a model. The code is at: http://pastie.textmate.org/79821 if you want to see it highlighted. I have pasted it below as well. Basically, I have an acts_as_nested_set model called "Node", which works fine. I have a function which finds the language name of the node instance.
2009 May 22
1
[PATCH server] fix for BZ #477796: pool name uniqueness
We already had the validation rule in place, but the way the betternestedset API sets the parent_id the rules were being bypassed. Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- src/app/models/pool.rb | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/app/models/pool.rb b/src/app/models/pool.rb index 2979fcb..0a63723 100644 --- a/src/app/models/pool.rb
2011 Mar 08
2
Rails - Acts as Nested - Impossible move, target node cannot be inside moved tree.
Hello, I''m using the Awesome Nested Set plugin: https://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set And in my model I do the following: acts_as_nested_set after_save :ensure_max_nestedset_level private def ensure_max_nestedset_level if self.level > 2 self.move_to_child_of(parent.parent) end end I do this to keep the levels from getting
2006 May 11
1
RoR completely ignoring a column when saving changes
I have an action that needs to update two models/two tables in one shot, and it works great, but ignores one column. Here is the action code: (verify_id is irrelevant in this case) [CODE] def edit @page_title = "Edit User" @page_active_3 = "active" if request.post? @user = User.find(params[:id]) @profile = @user.profile verify_id(@user.id,
2006 Aug 06
2
better_nested_set plugin
Hi, I''m pleased to announce that the better_nested_set plugin is released. It ehances acts_as_nested_set, adding methods to move parts of the tree, like: * move_to_child_of * move_to_right_of * move_to_left_of Pass them an id or an object. Other methods added by this mixin are: * root - root item of the tree (the one that has a nil parent; should have left_column =
2009 Nov 26
2
[error] avahi_entry_group_add_service_strlst("AdminNodeFQDN") failed: Invalid host name
Hi, After doing a clean install of ovirt in a Fedora 11 VM, I am unable to get anything working in the web interface. All I get is an error 500. After reviewing the logs I see the following error in /var/log/http/error.log [Thu Nov 26 11:29:11 2009] [notice] Apache/2.2.13 (Unix) DAV/2 mod_auth_kerb/5.4 mod_nss/2.2.11 NSS/3.12.2.0 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.6 configured -- resuming normal
2009 Aug 19
10
acts_as_list / acts_as_tree / acts_as_nested_set - which one
I am creating forum application which needs usage of acts_as_list or acts_as_tree or acts_as_nested_set. I am unable to decide among these. please could some one recommend from their experience? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2009 Oct 14
0
[PATCH server] hack betternested set to enable pool deletion
This is an ugly hack to fix the betternestedset plugin as currently a bug does not allow pools to be deleted. The single line commented out in this patch deletes the pool itself instead of only its children for whatever reason. This wouldn't be a problem were it not for the recent change to active record which enforces optimistic locking upon destroy operations. Since the database record is
2012 Nov 08
1
validates_uniqueness_of(*attr_names) w scope not working in unit test
Rails 3.2.8 Very strange , it works in dv mode console , but not in a unit test class User < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :subdomain validates_uniqueness_of :email, :scope => :subdomain_id class UserTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def initialize_user @booboo = FactoryGirl.create(:subdomain, name: "booboo") @coocoo = FactoryGirl.create(:subdomain, name:
2006 Feb 17
2
validate uniqueness of two fields
I have Proposals and Members and Members can vote for a proposal only once. So, I have "Vote belongs_to :member, :proposal", but to make sure a member only votes once, I want to make sure that there isn''t a vote in the db with that member_id and proposal_id. I can just put the appropriate find in a vote.valid? but I wanted to make sure I wasn''t missing a nice rails
2006 Jul 18
1
Bad values for acts_as_nested_set?
I moved from acts_as_tree to acts_as_nested_set because I need the all_children method. I''ve seen an alternative way to add this method to acts_as_tree here: http://www.chuckvose.com/articles/2006/05/24/recursive-children But I''d prefer to use the more efficient way of acts_as_nested_set (and not to have to revert to my old code). Anyway, here''s my issue: if I
2006 Apr 10
1
How to set foreignkey in such a situation?
Table articles has column: author,body,etc Table users has column: login_name,email,etc articles belongs_to user users has many articles foreign_key author references users(login_name) Therefore in Article.rb: belongs_to:article_user, :class_name=>"User", :foreign_key=>"author" and what''s going on? how the rails find the reference
2006 Mar 08
1
MSSQL error - 80004005 & Rails
hey there folks, i have a bit of a sitch here and i would love some help/input on it. i''ve inherited a horrible asp/mssql app that i''m re-writting using rails, but unfortunately i have to keep the asp version up and running. in order to do so i''ve had to write some admin functions, which i''ve done in rails. because the mssql schema wasn''t written
2006 Feb 23
3
Unable to update database object
This is really strange - hopefully someone out there may have seen behavior like this before. I have a user successfully created in the Users table of my application. When I try to update a single column using: @user = User.find(:first, :conditions => ["login_name = ?", @login_user.login_name]) @user.new_cookie_key @user.save I get the error:
2008 May 06
0
Nested Set question
Hi I''m want to create a nested forum list and i want to use BetterNestedSet should i make the forum act as BetterNestedSet or should i create a diffrent model for the forum order ? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
2009 Feb 20
0
Nested set - problems when creating child item
Hi, I''ve created a Model with Better Nested Set, but i''m having problems to create child items My workflow is: - In the (new) form, i pass the desired parent_id in a hidden field. - In the create action, i create the register and after saving it i use the move_to_child_of method. Everything works! My only problem is that Rails warns that I can''t mass asign the
2006 May 10
1
acts_as_nested_set does not work (in my case).
Hello, I am using acts_as_nested_set. My problem is that the columns "lft" and "rgt" get the value 0 if I create a new entity. If I delete an entity I get negative values (-1, -2, -3) - but for all entities. Is there anything missing? Is there any example for "acts_as_nested_set" in the web? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2007 Apr 25
2
form_remote_for, reloaded
Hi, being relativly new to RoR, I''m having a problem which I found described in this forum and somewhere else - but with no solution. I know, that it may be bad to mix table and form tags, but the first solution of an in place editing within a table looked nice: Version using form_for: <tr> <%form_for :time_record, :url => { :action => "add_time_record" } do