similar to: MPLS QoS

Hello all, It would be a great feature if QOS could be implemented in Tinc. It's not to do any sort of comparison, but with OpenVPN, the traffic can be shapped. In the way that tinc works as mesh VPN, the great feature would be to fix a shapping value on each nodes, known and respected by each others. (like MPLS does) As an exemple, you've got 3 nodes A,B and C, you want Tinc flows on A

Hi I;ve trixbox installed with 2 NICs. One NIC carries the MPLS-VPN traffic (only a 1 MB link without internet for carrying voice to another site) while the other NIC has a connection with public IP for internet services on that machine. the first NIC (eth0) has IP of 172.16.0.1 and is connected to router with WAN IP: 10.18.6.254 , the second IP is 203.234.82.98 (eth1). i want to have the

Hi stef and all I want measure the policy perfomance for video traffic on mpls diffserv network. there are two different polices for video packet 1. Video packets that are marked that are over the limit are to be rejected at the edge router. 2. Video packets that are marked that are over the limit are to be downgraded as best effort and are sent through. Before video enter my mpls

Need know about how to configure MPLS and Shorewall. Thanks friends ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It''s the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace

HI there Simple question :-) Why there is always only qos examples for upload and not download stream of adsl? I have a linux router which shares 5 wireless "customers" my neighbours and me to one adsl link 512kbps download 128kbps upload ... Now does it make sense to do qos on the linux router for download for us? Say if someone is using ssh from outside ... So I tried to apply the

hi, as far I know, iproute QoS works in interface, not in all interfaces. I want give one inner interface priority over other inner, like PRIO one IP over other. HOW? -- Andrius K. Kasparavičius _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello everybody on the list, I have the following situation where I want to police the speed of incoming packets from specific subnets to 1024kbps and then police all the rest to 256kbps, which is the speed my ISP grants for the rest of the internet. So, eth1 is the one connected to the cable modem and then to the internet. I do: tc qdisc add dev eth1 ingress handle ffff: then: tc filter

Hi, all: I''m involved in the study about the QoS,but have some problems , hope someone could help me answer: 1. Why most traffic shaping implement in the egress side (Uplink) rather than the ingress side(Dnlink)?(e.g. why put the police rule on the smaller bandwidth side but not put on the larger side) 2. I can''t differ the functionalities exactly

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

Hello, I''m trying to configure several wireless routers with QoS support. The idea is to implement differentiated services so that VoIP traffic gets the maximal priority, then video, control traffic, interactive data traffic and best-effort traffic. I have seen that CBQ used to be chosen as qdisc for implementing bandwith share in DiffServ but now HTB is preferred because it is

It appears that while Linux has plenty of traffic shaping mechanism on transmit, there is nothing on receive side. While generally it does make sense since transmit is more CPU intensive operation, after all receive also consumes CPU cycles. It is clear that it''s best to drop the packet as soon as possible, i.e. on receive, if possible - by the driver itself. It may not be feasible in

Hi! I am learning tcng without having experiance of tc and I am trying to build something that shall schedule traffic dependent on the value in the IPv4 packets ip_ttl field. I have read the tcng reference manual and cannot find information about forwarding. Is it possible to farward packets from ingress to egress without sending them upwards in layers?

ingress can be used to control the incoming packet, such as: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.11 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.22 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :2 first ,I do not sure these method can

Hi guys , i am starting to "play" with qos in linux. Well , i am trying to setup an ingress filter but i do not know why it is not working. tc add qdisc dev eth0 ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 160kbit burst 256kbit drop flowid :1 After that : iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle --sport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 1 So , i think this

I''m playing with the rather excellent QOS script from Alexander Clouter at http://digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/ So far I am really impressed with it - a very impressive example of the power of linux QOS rules (has pretty much everything in it from the LARTC Howto!) However, the instructions hint that "for QoS to affect locally generated traffic in a non ethernet bridge setup

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote: > +What: /sys/class/mic/mic(x)/firmware > +Date: August 2013 > +KernelVersion: 3.11 > +Contact: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt at intel.com> > +Description: > + When read, this sysfs entry provides the path name under > + /lib/firmware/ where the firmware image to be booted on the > + card can be found. The

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote: > +What: /sys/class/mic/mic(x)/firmware > +Date: August 2013 > +KernelVersion: 3.11 > +Contact: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt at intel.com> > +Description: > + When read, this sysfs entry provides the path name under > + /lib/firmware/ where the firmware image to be booted on the > + card can be found. The

As seen on my post at: http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28112#28112 This works very well... It does NOT work with stable 4.0! sveasoft will be issuing a bug fix for this (4.1) in the near future. Final Rev of working script w/ asterisk support I'm not going to run alchemy on production machines until it is stablish. Remember to set your uplink properly and to set

Hello Shorewall users I have a firewall based on RedHat 8.0 and Shorewall. I have 2 interfaces, with 2 ip address on the loc interface, the connection to the internet runs through my company''s network with an ADSL/MPLS line. I need to configure my Shorewall with the possiblity to deny some users'' access to the ''net'' for some subnet. Ex. my son''s

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:36:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Whitespace neatening... > > Multiline statement argument alignment. > Argument wrapping. > Use kmalloc_array instead of kmalloc. > > --- -ENOSIGNEDOFFBY :(