similar to: Determing the pfifo backlog

HTB: class htb 1:40 parent 1:1 leaf 40: prio 3 rate 358Kbit ceil 529Kbit \ burst 6Kb cburst 2260b Sent 145871726 bytes 97293 pkts (dropped 69, overlimits 0) rate 56741bit 37pps backlog 23p lended: 77429 borrowed: 19841 giants: 0 I would like to increase "backlog" because I think that would decrease "dropped". 23 packets of 1500 bytes each is only 34,500 bytes. IMO, there

I''m attempting to set up a hierarchy of tc qdiscs with filters, but the filters don''t seem to be working correctly.  I''m running iptables 1.3.5 with iproute 2.6.16.20060323 on a Gentoo 2.6.18 kernel.  The system takes all my tc setup, but does not filter packets as I am expecting it to based on my ruleset. My tc qdiscs and classes are added correctly and report as

Hi, there is something I''m not able to understand about HTB statistics. Why the qdisc show show how many packets are overlimits but in the classes there are always 0 packets overlimits or dropped? I try to expain with a simple example. I create a qdisc htb with only a class and then i do a lot of traffic. pc-innocenti:~# tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent root handle 1: htb default 10

I don''t understand the following: root@jmnrouter:~# tc -s class ls dev vlan1 && tc -s qdisc ls dev vlan1 class hfsc 1: root Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) period 0 level 2 class hfsc 1:1 parent 1: sc m1 0bit d 0us m2 220000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 220000bit Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) period 31304 work 7533852 bytes level 1 class hfsc 1:10

Mine also has a list of files that seemingly never heal. They are usually isolated on my arbiter bricks, but not always. I would also like to find an answer for this behavior. -----Original Message----- From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Hoggins! Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 12:26 PM To: gluster-users <gluster-users at

Maybe this is the right place to ask? Thanks again, Daniel Begin forwarded message: > From: Daniel Schaffrath <daniel.schaffrath@mac.com> > Date: 21 July 2007 11:01:01 GMT+02:00 > To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org > Subject: PFIFO to contain more pkts than allowed by TCP peer? > > Hello everybody, > > when the one and only connection originating my box is a TCP stream

I had a linux wireless router. I would like to monitor the queue lengh of the wireless interface. By default, the wifi0 interface is with pfifo_fast qdisc which does not report backlog packet. I replaced pfifo_fast with pfifo: ''tc qdisc replace dev wifi0 root pfifo'' Then I use iperf to send UDP pkts faster than the interface can handle but when I read the qdisc, the result is

Hello Icecast-dev, I am new to this list. I am working for the NPO, the Dutch Public Broadcasting agency. We do a lot of icecast streaming. We run at least 20 icecast server instances on our media streaming cluster. We ran into an issue that clients which where connecting to our streams seemed to be 'hanging' on the connection setup frequently. The client 'thinks' it is

Greetings - I''m new to QoS, so please be gentle (and yes, I''ve RTFM, though I don''t understand every bit of it) Here''s the thing; I''ve tried several scripts--simple and complex--for classifying my Vonage traffic into a high-priority queue, but no matter what I do it doesn''t seem to work. Right now I''m using the HTB script

Hi Thomas, I don't know if you like top or bottom quoting. That seems to be a big-little endian thing ;-) So, I will top quote and inline quote. Please see my comments inline, below. Kind regards, Stephan On 02/19/2015 04:18 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/19/2015 03:07 PM, Stephan Leemburg wrote: >> Hello Icecast-dev, >> >> I am new to

Hi, On 02/19/2015 03:40 PM, Stephan Leemburg wrote: > I don't know if you like top or bottom quoting. That seems to be a > big-little endian thing ;-) > > So, I will top quote and inline quote. playing it safe, ha! > Please see my comments inline, below. > > Kind regards, > Stephan > > > On 02/19/2015 04:18 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: >>

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

Thanks go out to whoever it was that fixed the AppDB so that it's now running nice and quick again. I can now login and submit applications/tests etc. There's a backlog of 500+ submissions which will take 2-4 hours to clear, hopefully this should be cleared within the next few days. Nick

Trying to capture some of the features we have in-flight for oVirt Node and stuff we'd like to work on in the near future. https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/wiki/Backlog Comments, additions, questions (and patches!) welcome :) Perry

Hi, On 02/19/2015 03:07 PM, Stephan Leemburg wrote: > Hello Icecast-dev, > > I am new to this list. Welcome! > I am working for the NPO, the Dutch Public Broadcasting agency. > We do a lot of icecast streaming. We run at least 20 icecast server > instances on our media streaming cluster. That's very nice to hear. > We ran into an issue that clients which where

Hello list, I'm not sure what to look for here, not sure if what I'm seeing is the actual "backlog" (that we need to make sure is empty while performing a rolling upgrade before going to the next node), how can I tell, while reading this, if it's okay to reboot / upgrade my next node in the pool ? Here is what I do for checking : for i in `gluster volume list`; do

Hi anyone using sangoma hardware with lartc? pls let me know Thanks Imthiyaz Original Message: ----------------- From: lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:00:07 +0200 (CEST) To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: LARTC Digest, Vol 28, Issue 23 Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 10: prio bands 6 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:1 handle 20: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:2 handle 30: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:3 handle 40: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:4 handle 50: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:5 handle 60: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:6 handle 70: bfifo # www traffic

hi all, my system with kernel 2.4.16 & 2.4.17( RH-7.2) has netfilter-1.2.4, iproute-ss010803, squid, dns with 4 ether cards.i am trying a simple situation where i want to shape traffic all the interfaces. at present iam using netfilter to allow a few ips, using transparent squid & iproute to limit bandwidth. i feel i must give more bandwidth for my local servers for my office &

My hardware is a Linksys AP with MIPS 300MHz and Linux kernel 2.4.20. The traffics are from two LAN switch ports to WAN port. And the traffics are generate at a rate of 80Mbit. So the total traffic to WAN port is 160Mbit. The shaping works well that the traffic to WAN port is about 50/30Mbit according to configuration. But the priority seems strange when the root rate is 50Mbit. When the root