similar to: Help: Wiki engine to handle structuded datas

Hi, One of our local town halls has asked me to implement a wiki-based website dedicated to ecological farming. The wiki is supposed to host a variety of documents in text, video and audio format. I've never used any wiki engines myself. Is there any one you can recommend in particular ? I'm using CentOS 5 on the server, so I would be glad to use a solution where I don't have to

Hi! at first i create an execution engine on a module (llvm::ExecutionEngine::create(module)). 1) is it allowed to modify the module, e.g. add a function? 2) is it allowed to construct a linker on this module, link something in, call linker.releaseModule() and destruct the linker again? -Jochen

This is a semantic question. (I''m doing some technical writing about DTrace.) I''ll little confused about how to explain what an "action" is. By any definition, "trace(x);" is an action. However, what about just "i++;"? Looking at the DTrace guide page 76: "Probe actions are described by a list of statements separated by semicolons (;)

Hi, I'd like to establish way to exchange data between two remote Asterisk server. Something like call over IAX and send some structured data. Any advice ? Regards, Rob.

Hi, I run hundreds of Redhat 8.0 boxes and Fedora Core 1 boxes, both Operation systems boxes give me some trouble reporting disk errors like the following (collected from /var/log/messages of each linux boxes by my own script). And a "badblocks" command on some of the related hard drive reports that failed sectors found, while others reports no, false-positive. Any one can give me

"net rpc vampire ..." does NOT set the SAM or SECURITY hives of the registry to "readable", which is what renders the PDC non-operable. "net rpc vampire ..." is safe to use as many times as it takes to get comfortable with the process. I did it my self when I was converting our "labs" NT4 domain to Samba. --

Hi, JIT does not allow functions to call others in different modules, so all modules need to be statically linked in a big fat module. If a module needs to be recompiled, all the others need to as well as relinked. there are two ways i intend to approach this problem: 1) forget about JITing, build each module into a .bc, call gcc to generate .soname libraries, dynamically load with dlopen()

Hi Charles, Are you using the old JIT engine or the newer MCJIT? In either case, external functions are resolved through the getPointerToNamedFunction method in the JIT Memory Manager. If you provide your own memory manager implementation, you should be able to link multiple modules together. If you re-JIT a module that you have previously linked to that will obviously cause some problems, but

Hello, I''m writing to describe a problem I ran into, and the solution, which I''ve already found, for posterity''s sake, b/c it took a very long time to figure out. While I don''t consider myself a rails newbie, this does qualify as a rookie mistake. I was having an integration test fail because its call to my one of my app''s destroy controller

On Apr 8, 2011, at 3:29 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > x86 processors use macro-op fusion to merge together two instructions and execute them as one. So it's beneficial for the compiler to emit them as a pair. > > Currently only compare and jump instructions get fused though. And I was wondering whether it also makes sense to fuse move and arithmetic instructions together, to form

Hi, I want to execute functions in a module, this module will have dependencies resolved in other modules. the modules might change (dynamic compilation environment) so i would prefer not not link all the dependencies in a single monolithic module, that is, if it can be avoided I hope to use Linker::linkModules but this is always destructive. That is ok for one module depending on a single one,

Sorry if it comes out a bit pushy bumping my own question, but it's been really difficult to find any info regarding this functionality in the mailing list archives. Just some emails i've found from people working on NaCl: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-December/046055.html  is there a branch where this is being work on, or is internal chromium project so far? Also

I'm sure there are a lot of people who've run into this problem with regard to ogg files... that is, when recording from live sources you end up with beautiful, wonderful sounding, brilliant ogg files that might be around 100 Meg for two hours. Now, if I want to split it into tracks, or remove commercials, what are my options. With mp3, there are little programs in windows that

He all, who can recommend me search engine(search for different models) for my web-site? ps: i know about ferret for example, but maybe there are some others? Thank you -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this

Hello all, This is to announce the creation of R-sig-wiki, a new R SIG (Special Interest Group) mailing list dedicated to the elaboration and maintenance of a R Wiki. You can subscribe at: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-wiki. There is currently a prototype for a new R Wiki at http://www.sciviews.org/_rgui/wiki (temporary address). The main idea is to offer a site where users

On Oct 23, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > On 10/23/13 5:38 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> >> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: >> >>>> The implementation of the two intrinsics is actually very similar. In this case, the difference would be that llvm.stackmap does not

Hi- Under privsep, I experimented with moving the session_setup_sia() out of do_child() and into do_setusercontext(), which is where the uids/gids are set to the final execution user. The call is made with a NULL tty, and this is functional provided that any later pty allocation uses grantpty() to set the device permissions. Logging in with this method shows that a utmp entry does get made for

I know that you should always use a POST to perform actions that are destructive. I intend to break this rule and use a GET, but before I do, I''d like to know if there is a better way of doing this:- I have an account edit form for the user to make changes to their profile. They have to be logged-in to do this. The problem is I have a file_column field within the form which is storing

Disclaimer: RoR newbie. Using the acts_as_taggable plugin. As an exercise I wanted to switch from the destructive TAG_WITH method to adding tags while preserving the existing ones. On the surface this seemed easy enough and eventually I got it working. However, the following method: def add_tags(list) Tag.transaction do Tag.parse(list).each do |name| if

Hi all, x86 processors use macro-op fusion to merge together two instructions and execute them as one. So it's beneficial for the compiler to emit them as a pair. Currently only compare and jump instructions get fused though. And I was wondering whether it also makes sense to fuse move and arithmetic instructions together, to form non-destructive instructions (which x86 lacks for