similar to: IpRoute + NAT problem

Sorry I dont have any answers, however I do have a question. I was told that ISDN-30 lines do not work during power failure. Can anyone with some better knowledge confirm or deny this? Is this because the ISDN-30 box on the wall requires power (and Telco providers just dont hook them into UPS as standard)? Or do they mean if your local circuit has lost power so will the local digital exchange

Hello Fach, I have used openvpn for a while and in the new release thereis a feature called "server mode" that makes posible to have a full network of vpn links besides a single TUN/TAP adaptor (a pure software NIC) in the server. I haven't used that feature, but I think this is what you need. Also openvpn runs on linux, *bsd, solaris, windows, and maybe in other OS. Miguel >

Hi, I have an Samba 2.0.7 Fileserver on my RedHat 7.0 Linuxbox Access to the shares with an Linuxclient - all works fine. When I use an Win98 or WIN ME client, I've got many network collisions. (Same file and share) Any ideas ? Thereis only one socket option set in my smb.conf: socket option = TCP_NODELAY Network = 100MBit/s Ethernet Changing of NICs,cables or Hub doesnt't resolve the

Hi, recently I saw but did not pay too much attention to a question that concerned regression with positive coefficients. In Splus, thereis the nnls() function that can be used if I am not wrong, but what about R ? Now I have the same problem: doing a logistic regression under constraint that coefs are non negative. What can I do with R? is there a (weighted) nnls() counterpart available? Thanks

Hi, I am trying to test a Mediatrix 1104 FXS SIP gateway with Asterisk, but I have some problems. When registering the Mediatrix gw doesnt respond to Asterisk's 'proxy authrisation required' messages as if it didnt understand them. Strnage thing, when I have type=friend, asterisk says that the Mediatrix is unauthorised - get fast busy in handset. When I put type=peer in sip.conf, I

Hi, I 'm using spandsp-0.0.2pre26<http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.2pre26/>, and thereis a bug adding headers: LOCALHEADERINFO and LOCALSTATIONID (I can't see them ). But faxes goes using rxfax and txfax fine. I also have tried development versions, the bug is fixed, but I get bad faxes (I get one page, but my tiff consists of three pages, and I get just

looks like you sent this to the wrong person... ----- Forwarded message from JON GERDES <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> ----- Envelope-to: mikef@mikef-linux-x86.matchmail.com Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:18:43 -0800 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:17:40 +0000 From: "JON GERDES" <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> To: <mfedyk@matchmail.com> Subject: Re: win98-samba2.0.7 = Network

Hi all, i have a little problem to understand this warning message, it's annoying and it cause a lot of spurious in the log files. Im working with this scenario: a sip outgoing trunk (Trunk-out) that support only ulaw and all calls are always routed to this. a list of sip UAs that potentially can use any codec apart g729/g723. I setup the asterisk to do as mediaproxy so directmedia=no and

Hello all We have experienced some problems with samba recently. People were unable to access their files. Here is the story: [2000/03/02 09:12:26, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(535) pdc (192.168.21.210) connect to service Document as user root (uid=0, gid=0) ( pid 1987) [2000/03/02 09:12:51, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sem_change(124) ERROR: sem_change(6,-1) failed (Identifier removed)

I''d like to hear some suggestions about securely administering a system remotely. Here''s the application: a project is going to scatter some server machines around the US. The server machines will be running Linux, with the only network servers being a custom application. Ignoring the separate question of physical security, how can I remotely check the system''s

Hi all How to add a static route to a hostname with iproute2? I tried: ip route add linux.com via 192.168.1.1 I got the following reply: Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "linux.com". With "route command" I do not have problems route add -host linux.com gw 200.214.148.140 As the iproute2 is the standard in the current linus distros, I would like to know if is

I am using policy based routing and I have 3 route tables setup, ADSLLink1, ADSLLink2, and ADSLLoadBalanced, "ip route show <table>" will show me the routes that I have added to the first two, but not from ADSLLoadBalanced, it will show the last route that was added to the table but no others. There are approx 16 routes added to the table, I know they are there because they work,

-- Can someone please give an example or two how one might accomplish DNAT''ing and ip routes? It appears that the de''DNAT''ing takes place after the routing decisions so when I use something like ip rule from incoming-address table out-route it just doesn''t seem to ever route anything out. DNAT doesn''t seem to keep track of the incoming

Hi, i need to setup a equalized route like this: # ip route add default scope global equalize nexthop via xx.xx.5.254 dev eth1 nexthop via xx.xx.5.254 dev eth2 The problem i''m having is that i need to use virtual interfaces too. Example (something like that): ip route add default scope global equalize nexthop via xx.xx.5.254 dev eth1 nexthop via xx.xx.5.254 dev eth2 \ nexthop

i forget i''m using kernel 2.4.20 i''ve just compiled the new kernel 2.6.13 but i didn''t use it yet.- but it was compiled (the new kernel) with a lots of new support options to do lots of things with QoS and iptables upport etcetcetc regards again.- Guillermo from Argentina __________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus

Anybody knows allready programmed libraries either java or C to create/destroy queues?

Hi, when iproute is installed then the default queue that it is giving to an interface is pfifo_fast. I would like to ask whether it is possible to disable this feature and rather have the kernel give by default to an interface the queue that it would give if iproute hadn''t been installed. I want to be able to customize the queue with tc only when it is necessary. Is this

I have a box with only 1 IP (lets say 10.0.0.1) which has an ipip tunnel to another machine (lets say 10.2.0.1)(different networks) i wan''t all packets coming to 10.0.0.1 destination port 80 be routed thru the tunnel device and be answered by 10.2.0.2 (which has an interface configured with 10.0.0.1). It works if the incoming ip address is not configured on the receiving machine

Hi, not sure if it will work, i''ve 2 leased lines, behind line 1 is a webserver, this server should answer all incomming http requests through leased line 1, the webserver self parses other webserver, this outbound traffic should go over leased line 2. i''ve successfully added fwmark with iproute, but if i set the policy for the webserver to use leased line 2 (for parsing other

Has any one ever done it? We are in the planning stages and the majority of the hardware we have available is PPC, what are some thoughts? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/