similar to: script

dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat

Hello! My system is: Internet ADSL(PPPoE) ---> ppp0 [LINUX server(router)] eth0 ---> LAN Server(router) is running on LINUX Slackware 8.1. I have recompiled a 2.4.22 kernel, enabled all QoS support in the kernel config, including HTB. My ADSL bandwidth is 256Kbit/s for download and 64Kbit/s for upload. I use the following HTB+IPTABLES configuration, because I want to reduce bandwith for

i''m using one line on eth2 only for web traffic eth1 is my internal line and eth0 is my main line to internet . i''m marking packets like this i have default route on eth0 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 66 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --sport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 66 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1

Hello all.. i''m a newbie in LARTC... And I reallize that my problem is a clasical problem in this LARTC milist..... So if anyone dont mind.. please help me with this... Situation : LAN --> Gateway <-- Internet 10.0.0.0/8 --> eth0 eth1<-- 20.0.0.0/8 Linux Box: RedHat 8.0 /sbin/tc size is +- 700 kb #NAT to all computer to access

Hi, this is a followup to "Problem with HTB and ceil", the problem with the ceiling has been resolved, thanks to the memebers on this m/g. Now I have the problem that packets get into the correct classe with the correct marks but the prios are not respected. I have 4 different classes: 1. voip class / prio 0 / mark 100 / voip traffic 2. ACK class / prio 1 / mark 200 / ACK packets to

I have a server whit 2 interfaces of network, where eth0 is the interfaces connetc to internet and eth1 to the internal network. This server hace a Squid only, but i setting the iptables for protection to the server. Iptables run from script and in this script i setting the redirection for the other server in my internal network to port 80 and 443. I follow the diferent how to and many manual, but

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >

Hi, I''m having issues with policing my incoming traffic by matching packet marks made by iptables. I''ve checked as many sites and guides as I can find, and I seem to be doing the exact same thing as they all are, but there''s still no success. As such, I was wondering if anyone can have a quick look to see if I''ve done anything obviously stupid? Essentially, I

#!/bin/sh PPP=(ppp0 ppp1) IP=(`ifconfig ${PPP[0]}|sed -n 2p|column -s ":" -t|awk ''{print $3}''` `ifconfig ${PPP[1]}|sed -n 2p|column -s ":" -t|awk ''{print $3}''`) GATEWAY=(`ifconfig ${PPP[0]}|sed -n 2p|column -s ":" -t|awk ''{print $5}''` `ifconfig ${PPP[1]}|sed -n 2p|column -s ":" -t|awk ''{print

Hi, i''m newbie with traffic control. I create a script based in one from Jason Boxman (thx a lot). the upload flow is prioritized well, but when i download from a site, the down flow vary a lot from 25 KB to 4 KB. Before i use this script the downloads are constant between 22 an 25 KB. Perhaps there''s something wrong in my script ? I paste it, thx.

Hello. In short Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO''s chapter 15.4. Prioritizing interactive traffic does not help me at all. I have an asymmetric ADSL connection nominal 64Kbit in / 16Kbit out, real (based on bulk transfers measures) 256Kbit/26Kbit. First thing I would like to improve is to keep interactive (ssh) connection fast even if uplink is full. The test I make

sorry, i''m confuse where to post my problem.. i was post to shorewall-users, but must read to support.html this''s my problem ----------- i have squid running on DMZ zone and my network using ProxyARP on eth1 and eth2 mylinuxbox slackware 9.2 my network can access to internet normal, but can''t redirect to squid server from firewall. sometimes my network can connect

I wanted to post my new shaping rules which I am running on my IPCOP router. They seem to be working very well so far. Any comments to my setup would be appreciated. #!/bin/bash # clear out the chain and setup a new chain iptables -t mangle -D OUTPUT -o eth1 -j BW-OUT 2> /dev/null > /dev/null iptables -t mangle -F BW-OUT 2> /dev/null > /dev/null iptables -t mangle -X BW-OUT 2>

Hello...I have a Slackware based machine doing routing & QoS for my internal LAN users... It has two interfaces: eth1(100mbps) that connects to the aDSL modem(USR 9105) and eth0(100mbps) that connects to my local LAN... I''am using shorewall as a firewall...i think it''s configured well as it''s working as i want and i pass all the online firewall tests... :D All lan

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=606 Summary: Iptables-restore removing the wrong rules Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables-restore AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: me

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Hi, with the attached config my gaming ping is still +20ms, even if the line isn''t saturated..can anybody give me a hint how to get a better response time? my line: 1024/128kbit outbound: one htb qdisc for gaming (7kbps) prio 0 ceil 14kbps<- should get more traffic when needed. Htb again for irc and default. inbound: css, irc, p2p, default <- same shema as before, give css

Hi, I am using the following script to limit my outbound traffic. This scipt runs on a box behind my firewall. It limits my outbound passive ftp traffic to 39K perfectly....just like i want. However, i just noticed that it is also limiting uploads coming to my server. Is there something I can change to make it not limit uploads to my server? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic #

Hi, I am using the following script to limit my outbound traffic. This scipt runs on a box behind my firewall. It limits my outbound passive ftp traffic to 39K perfectly....just like i want. However, i just noticed that it is also limiting uploads coming to my server. Is there something I can change to make it not limit uploads to my server? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic #

Hello, I am using a simple script, which is based on prio. The point is, that it is not possible to use htb on wifi networks, so I thought that prio will work fine, but it does almost nothing. All I wanted was to make the important packets like icmp, games, VoIP,... to go first, and to slow the things like FTP data transfer, etc. When I use $TC -s qdisc show dev ${IFACE}, I see, that the