similar to: Help: NIST Net or NetEm ?

Thanks in advance! Summary: when I load netem and teql together, teql doesn''t work correctly. (If I load teql only, everything is fine) I loaded both netem and teql. Netem is associated with eth0, and teql is associated with both eth0 and eth1. But traffic only goes out of eth1. Attached are the commands that I used to configure teql and netem (on machine 1), and commands to

OK, I spammed the mailing list recently, but I will be fired if I can''t solve the problem today. (just kidding, but I did waste lots of time on it :( ) The common configuration for teql is for two computers connected directly with two links. My topology is a little different: one link is connected directly, but the other is connected through a gateway. My problem is teql can''t

Hi all, I want to implement a "weighted" teql that can send packets to interfaces based on their "weights". To do this, I want to create multiple virtual network interfaces, and add them to teql. Since teql will send packets to each interface in a round-robin way, a weighted teql is achieved (my guess). I already have two physical network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. I

Yesterday I posted a question, but I guess too much detail is provided that no one would bother to read, so I rephrase the question and hopefully some one may be willing to read. Sorry to spam. I am using TEQL on two computers, each with two network interfaces. The two eth0 are connected directly, and the two eth1 are connected via a gateway (a linux machine). The problem is that when I send

I am measuring the performance of one TCP connection over two symmetric paths. Packets are sent to two paths alternatively. I found that when the latency of each path are within 1ms, the overall TCP throughput is the *sum* of the throughput of the two paths. However, when the latency of the two paths increases to 5ms, the overal TCP throughput drops to the throughput of a *single* path. Has anyone

Hi, I am using netem to add loss and then adding another qdisc within netem according to the wiki. Then i want to change the netem drop probability without having to delete the qdisc and recreate it. I try it but I get invalid argument: thorium-ini hedpe # tc qdisc add dev ath0 root handle 1:0 netem drop 1% thorium-ini hedpe # tc qdisc add dev ath0 parent 1:1 handle 10: xcp capacity 54Mbit

I''m trying to setup a netem delay with no luck (using iproute2-2.6.8, compilation broke during arpd compile, so I use the tc binary in the tc/ subdir, there''s also a q_netem.so there). kernel is 2.6.8.1, compile with CPU cycle counter as time reference. I was using sch_delay of 2.6.7 happily with something like: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root 1: delay latency 1ms rate 35M now I use:

Hi! We want to run TCP streams to several port numbers through one interface, each with a different delay set by Netem. E.g. TCP streams to port 80 could have 50ms delay, while TCP streams to port 81 could have 100 ms delay and so on. We have tried to solve this by using a combination of tc filter and netem rules, but we can''t get it quite right. We are considering one class per port,

I''m trying to use tc and netem to delay packets from several different machines as they exit via eth0. Assume two source IPs, 10.0.0.122 and 10.0.0.133. I''d like to delay packets from the first one by 200ms, and packets from the second one by 300 ms. Any other traffic should be sent out normally. Here''s what I tried: # make three classes, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3: tc qdisc add

Hi all, I am currently trying to emulate a satellite link, via Netem, on a testbed which is OSPF-enabled. I''d like to set up a Netem box between two routers. Since all routing between routers is dynamic, I''m wondering how to set up OSPF on my Netem box? Could someone indicate me if it is feasible and give me some guidelines to possibly do so? Thanks in advance, Vincent.

Hi all, I''m running some tests with netem and I noticed some strange behaviour that looks like a bug: I''m pinging another machine and adding delay with netem. When I tell netem to give me a 10ms delay, it works fine. The problem is that when I ask for a 11ms delay, it gives me 20ms! It happens for any value between 11ms an 20ms, and it repeats for values over 20ms, now

Hi, I have three linux machines, and I want to let one of them forward packets betwen the other two. The forwarding node has two ethernet cards, connecting the two two machines respectively. However, when I ping between the two end points, the forwarding node can receive the ping requests at its eth0, but it never forwards them to its eth1. So is the reverse direction. The forwarding node is

Following is sharelessly copied from one of the newsgroups I read on grc.com.. /Soren NIST issues recommendations for secure VOIP http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/34747-1.html http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-58/SP800-58-final.pdf *********************************************************** Quote *********************************************************** The National

Postdoctoral Position Announcement National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is seeking to fill a post-doctoral / guest researcher position to work on greenhouse gas emissions and dispersion modeling, including atmospheric flux inversions. As part of its Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and Climate Science Measurements

Hi there, I have two ethernet connections of 2Mbit/s each and I''m trying to add them together to one 4Mbit/s connection but I cannot get more than approximate 1Mbit/s! My setup: I have a LAN (10.2.18.0/24), connected to a larger network (10.0.0.0/8) by two WAN-connections with 2Mbit/s each. On each end I have a Linux router. I first setup the routers to use TEQL with one of the

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. P1, P2 and P3 are three linux machines, and each has two network cards. P2 and P3 are connected in two ways: (1) directed connection between P2.eth0 and P3.eth0; (2) connection via P1. P1 acts as the gateway. TEQL is installed on P2 and P3 to load-balance packet transmission by round-robin sending packets

Hello, I saw from OpenSSH man pages that the DSA key length must be 1024 bytes (according to the standard FIPS 186-2). According to the FIPS186-3 and NIST SP800-57, DSA key length could be greater than 1024 bytes (2048, 3072). Will OpenSSH be compliant with this new standard? If yes, could you share with me the delivery plan of OpenSSh version implementing FIPS186-3/NIST SP800-57

Dear Gurus, Can you please help/guide me with the following: I have 3 NICs in my Linux RH 9 (kernel 2.4.20) machine. (eth0, eth1 and eth2). I want to setup a 'link equalizer' (teql) between eth0 and eth1. This I am able to do with the required commands (using the utilities 'tc' and 'ip'). Now I need to setup a bridge between eth2 and this new interface

NIST maintains a repository of Statistical Reference Datasets at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd/. I have been working through the datasets to compare R's results to their references with the hope that if all works well, this could become a validation package. All the linear regression datasets give results with some degree of accuracy except one. The NIST model includes 11 parameters,

Sorry this is the right message. Hi all, in my school I have: - two Netopia router for ADSL (perform NAT), - one linux box with 3 ethernet card I want to make a load balancing on the two ADSL line. I have configured the system as follow: The LAN interface, of the two ADSL router, have address (A) 192.168.0.254 (B) 192.168.2.254 The 3 ethernet card, on the linux box, have address: -eth2