similar to: Multiple gateways

Hello, I am trying something crazy here. I have gone through the old archives, lartc.org and lot''s of documentation, but still something is wrong. Here is the situation; The server is Fedora core 2 running kernel 2.6.5 I have 2 uplinks to two different ISP''s. (It will be 3-4 in the future). These ISP''s should serve the bandwith to local clients with multiple subnets.

Hi All! I need to deploy a bridge firewall using linux kernel 2.6. I had success using kernel 2.4 plus br-nf patch. But the configuration does not work with kernel 2.6. If the default policy for the iptables FORWARD chain is ACCEPT I have a bridge. If iptables FORWARD chain is DROP I have an insulator (no packet flows). Any hint? I did some google search and in many places they say "kernel

Hello, We have 3 DSL connections connected to eth3 and another interface with a dedicated link in eth0 (main table) We want to balance selected traffic (using fwmark and iptables) through our 3 DSL connections in a secondary table named DSL (without using the dedicated link in eth0), but the next command is not accepted, and gives us the following error: # ip route add default

Hi, I managed to fix 128kbit for an IP address of 192.168.200.3 as below: - tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100mbit tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 128kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst 192.168.200.3 flowid 1:1 tc qdisc add dev eth3 parent 1:1 sfq perturb 10 How can I

Hi all, I have the following problem. A Linux box configured as a bridge. One interface connects to the router via a crossover cable, the other connects to a switch via the cable that used to go to the router. Now I get the following: [root@localhost net]# ifconfig eth3 eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:2D:07:61:5D UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX

Hi! I have a setup where I want to prefer traffic on one port (for testing purposes I used port 22) my setup is : tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:7 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev

ok i will do it in text: 66.92.114.46 eth0 209.141.2.194 eth1 192.168.119.101 eth2 192.168.120.101 eth3 What i have is a linux box RH7.3 which will eventually run Shorewall Firewall. On this box there is eth0 66.92.114.46 conneted to isp1 and eth1 209.141.2.194 connected to isp2 It also has eth2 192.168.119.101 and eth3 192.168.120.101 which will connect to a failover appliance which has 2 wan

Hi, I have a linux router with 4 ethernet cards; eth0 through eth3. Basically, all I want to do is route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and all traffic from eth1 to eth3. I''ve looked through the LARTC how-to, specifically at chapter 4, about multiple providers. However, I am still a bit confused, and not sure how to set up my routing tables, as my scenario differs from the one in the

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

I''ve made some tests... eth2 is my internal interface, LAN is connected here. Before I had IMQ device in AB mode... PREROUTING [A]fter NAT, POSTROUTING [B]efore NAT. I want the same situation on ifb. I do this in this way: --- # incoming traffic here from LAN is before NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle ffff: ingress # outcoming traffic here from WAN is after NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2

Dear all, If I do cause offence by posting OT here I apologise in advance, I am however desperate for help and after posting on other forums without any ideas I know many networking experts will see this here and hope they can enlighten me. I will gladly donate some PayPal money to the person who can help. I have a leased line on 83.111.160.6 (/30 subnet, gw is 83.111.160.5), and they

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:49 ------- We haven't seen this

This one is really throwing me. Thanks in advance for any advice. I''m working on a 4 port firewall system. It is running heartbeat+drbd. Primary box looks like this: eth0 -> net/cicso router 192.168.144.2/29 eth1 -> drbd/heartbeat crossover cable 192.168.254.253/30 eth2 -> dmz 192.168.144.10/24 eth3 -> loc 192.168.101.2/24 The IP''s

* sorry for the other schema, it came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+

Hi! I have read all informations i could find, but some things are still not clear. My setup is: ---INTERNET1(eth0)-\ /- Local net1 (eth2) GW ---INTERNET2(eth1)-/ \- Local net2 (eth3) I have NAT and a working setup using HTB,SFQ, classifying with the iptables -j CLASSIFY way. I shape only the traffic coming from the internet heading to the intranet. I would like

I am running a public core router using private links from my provider. Details: RH7.3 9 interfaces (all Intel) eth0 is default gateway and has a private IP address all other interfaces are links to other routers or networks eth3 has a public IP address The core router will rarely need to access sites out on the internet, but when it does it cannot get there because the eth0 has a private IP

Hi Tom (and others) encase you don''t know my network already ;) here''s a quick run down eth0 lan 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0 eth1 wan1 172.30.7.4/255.255.240.0 eth2 wan2 202.37.230.93/255.255.255.192 eth3 wan3 203.96.213.73/255.255.254.0 I''ve got routes and rules for all the above interfaces :) I want to add another one, however I fear this might cause some issues I have

Hi All, I''m using HTB to shape traffic, a little like this: tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 htb tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1:0 htb tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1: protocol 0x8100 prio 5 u32 match u16 3000 0x0fff at 0 flowid 1:1 action ipt -j MARK --or-mark 0x01000000 tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol 0x8100 prio 5 u32 match u16 3000 0x0fff at 0 flowid 1:1 action

Hi All, I''m using the Mandrake Linux MultiNetwork Firewall which is a web based interface to the shorewall firewall. I have an internal ip address of 172.25.38.1 which I am try to nat to a public address so that the client pc can ftp to the internet I have add the following in the nat file: 168.10.10.1 eth3 172.25.38.1 No No And this to rules: ACCEPT lan:172.25.38.1 wan tcp

Hi all, I''m having some problems setting up qdiscs on a bridge.The config looks a little like this: ifconfig ifb0 up # Bring up the IFB for this bridge. tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress tc qdisc add dev eth3 ingress tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 # Raw qdiscs on each bridge port tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth