similar to: [FYI] PSPacer release

I recalled a discussion of manipulating outgoing tcp windows in order to control return tcp traffic. I finally found at least some of that discussion in a thread with the subject above (of this message). But I thought someone announced an implementation and I don''t see it under this thread. If anyone else remembers or knows where I should look for it, please let me know. I''m

Hi all, I have evaluated Fusion-io ioDrive duo (PCIe direct attached NAND flash memory storage) on the CentOS 5.4. The experimental result shows the write performance with multiple jobs (processes) on the ext3/ext4 filesystems is lower than that of XFS. The question I have is what is the cause of the ext3/ext4 performance limitation. I have measured the random write performance on several

At Rusty's suggestion, I tested vhost base performance with ping. Results below, and seem to be what you'd expect. I'm working on TSO support, expect results shortly. latency with ping (lower is better): native: [root at virtlab17 ~]# ping -c 1000000 -f -q 21.1.50.4 PING 21.1.50.4 (21.1.50.4) 56(84) bytes of data. --- 21.1.50.4 ping statistics --- 1000000 packets transmitted,

At Rusty's suggestion, I tested vhost base performance with ping. Results below, and seem to be what you'd expect. I'm working on TSO support, expect results shortly. latency with ping (lower is better): native: [root at virtlab17 ~]# ping -c 1000000 -f -q 21.1.50.4 PING 21.1.50.4 (21.1.50.4) 56(84) bytes of data. --- 21.1.50.4 ping statistics --- 1000000 packets transmitted,

Hi, on my Debian GNU/Linux (sid) i have (among others) a partition which is mounted (normally at startup via /etc/fstab) on /home. But in a few cases (say six in the last months) /home silently isn't mounted. Since then I have "debug" as option in /etc/fstab. In this cases I log in as root and do a mount -a which works with a few diagnostic messages (see below). Today it

Using kernel is 2.4.30 win32 syslinux 3.52 Preparing floppy under Windows XP SP2 1) Preparing boot floppy ======= syslinux.cfg content ====================== PROMPT 0 DISPLAY warning.txt DEFAULT kernel APPEND root=/dev/ram0 rw initrd=ukmrd.gz ramdisk_size=5000 bdev=/dev/fd0 ip=192.168.422.25 ipm=255.255.255.0 ipreq=n ipg=192.168.42.1 ipdns=192.168.42.2 mnet=pcnet32 durl=http://KP/ukminstall

Hello. I apology in advance if I am not reporting things correctly, but my knowledge about these things is very limited. I have five Transtec computers, approximately born in July 2005; they have an intel 82845G video card. The last 'yum update' was on January 30, 2014. I did not reboot the machines at that time. I cannot be sure about the date of the 'yum update' preceding

Hello everyone, I recently bought a Riello IPG 600 UPS ( http://www.riello-ups.com/products/1-ups/39-iplug) to prevent hardware damage to my server in case of power outages (already lost two hard drives because of this) and I managed to successfully configure it with NUT version 2.7.4 available for Ubuntu 17.04: nut/zesty-updates,zesty-updates,now 2.7.4-5ubuntu2.1 all [installed]

Hi, Greg, Eddie, I found that in SR-IOV + HVM environment, ping latency depends on ping interval. The NIC is Intel 82576 (1000Mbps), server uses xen-4.0.1, domain-0 is kernel-2.6.32 and HVM is kernel-2.6.31. The server and client are connected through a 1000Mbps switch. The data is as following: # ping -i 1 192.168.0.21 PING 192.168.0.21 (192.168.0.21) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from

Hello. I try to install from the netinstall iso file. Everything works as I expect up to the screen where I have to choose between "Desktop", "Minimal Desktop", "Minimal", etc. If I choose either "Desktop" or "Minimal Desktop", I have a pop up saying "Installation Starting" with "Starting installation process", and, about a

On 05/08/15 17:18, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: > Em 2015-08-05 11:45, Rowland Penny escreveu: >> On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >>> An example of how slow is... >>> >>> [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time id teste >>> uid=16777232(teste) gid=16777216(domain users) >>> grupos=16777216(domain >>>

Em 2015-08-05 11:45, Rowland Penny escreveu: > On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >> An example of how slow is... >> >> [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time id teste >> uid=16777232(teste) gid=16777216(domain users) grupos=16777216(domain >> users),16777220(operacao),16777222(BUILTIN\users) >> >> real 1m15.981s >> user 0m0.005s

Hi, I notice you're using 4.6.2 and I'm using 4.6.11. I made the following comment at some point within [global]:   #disable "unix extensions" to avoid using "allow insecure wide links"   #  for access to ../xxxx_SNAPS for BTRFS "previous versions" snapshots   #  --it seems to have reverted once more to not need the below two settings   ##unix

On 05/08/15 19:55, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: > Em 2015-08-05 13:38, Rowland Penny escreveu: >> On 05/08/15 17:18, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >>> Em 2015-08-05 11:45, Rowland Penny escreveu: >>>> On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >>>>> An example of how slow is... >>>>> >>>>> [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck < l.wandrebeck at quelquesmots.fr> wrote: > Hi there, > > I?m working on deploying our new cluster. > Masters have 5?1gbps (i210 and i350, thus using igb.ko), configured with > mtu 9000, 802.3ad. Works fine *but* I can?t get DCB working (pause frame, > aka flow control, which is supported by and enabled on our switches).

I'm Takano. Now, a system such as the following by cooperation with the Samba and Windows ActiveDirectory We would like to build. ☆Samba OS：CentOS7 Samba：(ver4.4.5) ☆Windows(ActiveDirectory) OS：Windows Server 2003 ※State functional level is raised from 2000 to 2003. That you want to achieve it will be following. ・Create a domain controller (samba.test) on the Samba server side. ・And set

I think that it may be appropriate to submit this patch for linux-next instead of 3.15-rc4... On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see SET_ETHTOOL_OPS gone. > This does that. > > Compile tested only, but I'd seriously wonder if this broke anything. > > Suggested-by: Dave

SET_ETHTOOL_OPS is equivalent to : #define SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(netdev,ops) \ ( (netdev)->ethtool_ops = (ops) ) how it makes difference removing this code and replacing with the code mentioned ? On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS > > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see

SET_ETHTOOL_OPS is equivalent to : #define SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(netdev,ops) \ ( (netdev)->ethtool_ops = (ops) ) how it makes difference removing this code and replacing with the code mentioned ? On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS > > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see

Hi Takano, You wrote: ※The direction of the trust Samba server → Windows server Which should mean, according to some MS book sitting on my desk, that you want Samba domain to trust MS domain. In the Samba FAQ, here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Does_Samba_support_trust_relationship_with_AD.3F you can read "Samba can be trusted, but can't trust yet." According to that, if