similar to: General Traffic Control Question

We''re trying to figure out how to have equal cost multipath routing using OSPF (quagga) and have come up with the following... Has anyone done something similar? -- How do you deal with incoming services (mail/web/etc) in such a scenario as below - And does anyone have any suggestions? There''s more detail below.... Diagram and overview: Network A connects to Core1 and Core2

Hello, I have finished setting up the load balancer with IPROUTE ... also patch the kernel to support DGD and now it''s working fine with the valuable guide at LARTC website, Julian Anastasov, and the kind people in this mailing list. Now I would like to launch a web server and a ftp server to the public but I''m stuck into a problem and really need your help. Currently internal

Hi! I got some strange problem with routing loadbalancing. I cannot get the full speed from my ISPs until I get some big files from close ftp server. I have server with one connection to internal network and 3 to ISPs: __________ | eth1|---- ISP1 | | internal--|eth0 eth2|---- ISP2 net | | (~300 | eth3|---- ISP3 hosts

Hi all Iam planning to deploy Multiple Links using RH 9.0/ PIII 500Mhz/512MB RAM With all Patches related to Route and rest Mentioned in nano.txt Iam Running BGP 4 with all the ISP, but iam not doing Load balancing the Links Each Link have specific application and specific users. Eth0 is connected to Local Net eth1- ISP1 eth2- ISP2 eth3- ISP3 Now i want to make Specific Routes x.x.x.x

I''m attempting to perform some class based routing using Linux in combination with quagga/zebra. My current experience is with FreeBSD/ipfw/quagga. I''ve read most of the LARTC documentation as well Martin Brown''s Guide to IP Layer Network Admin. Here''s the basics of my set up: |- R1 <-> ISP1 R0-| |- R2 <-> ISP2 | |- R3

Hello, I am thinking of connecting a Shorewall Firewall to three different ISPs and load balancing some but not all connections. Just asking for some advice for now. Here''s the network layout: ISP1 ISP2 ISP3 ADSL Router 1 ADSL Router 2 ADSL Router 3 | | | FW:eth0 FW:eth1 FW:eth2

Hi all! After that good thread "DGD patch not detecting dead gateway" I was able to set up a Load Balancing with ping based DGD (without Julian Anastasov patch). But now I''m facing a new problem and tried some options, with only partial solutions. I made a script based on http://www.mail-archive.com/lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl/msg16257.html (Thank you Manish Kathuria),

I want to build a robust firewall for a resort installation. The resort''s telephony is entirely VOIP, asterisk based. We have the following internet feeds: 1) 512/512 kb fixed bandwidth leased line with static IP from Telco- primary connection, expensive, to use for VOIP, VPN traffic, mail server, SSH access for remote work. Reliable. 2) 256/512 kb ADSL from Telco, not fixed IP -

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:27:58PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > > times over the

On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > > seeing if things

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

Hi, I have a digium card (igium, Inc. Wildcard TE405P quad-span T1/E1/J1 card 5.0V (rev 02)) 4 ports I want to make a loop test between digium card E1 to test the configuration of dahdi What I want to do scenario is I connect port 1 and port4 in the digium card with E1 cable SIPcall-->E1 Digium port 1--->(Loop)E1 port 2---->sip extension local. kindly can any can help me to

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a