similar to: New shaping program - ist-shaper

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

Hi! I have configured traffic shaping with htb and imq but when i am downloading the latency for example on the Bnet class is very high ..... example: 65 kb/s download best latency: 56ms lateny on bnet class while downloading: 400 350 250 350 400 100 300 200 80 200 300 250 ..... To get informations about latency i am marking ping packets with iptables. I want to play during other users

Hi all, I''m looking for the best way to set up a Linux router with "tc" to limit the incoming bandwidth my ISP''s clients use. Please assist me with the following: Diagram: INTERNET | | | |eth0 ----------- Linux router/shaper |eth1 | | | --------------- Clients1(64k)/2(128k)/3(64k)/... Clients normally purchase bandwidth in bundles of

I have a linux server connecto into a 100mps LAN, i use iptables implementation of shorewall (shorewall.net) and then I used the wondershaper. When I adjusted the values below, I got a download speed for vsftp at a whooping 1187.91 KB/s but a upload speed is only a painful 27 KB/s. I dont fully understand the underpinng codes behind the wondershaper htb stuff. can someone guide me on how can i

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

Hello guys, I am experiencing a strange behaviour with HTB. Here is my situation: Test PC -------- internet ------------- ISP ----- fiber connection --------- (eht2) RT1 (eth1) --------- wireless connection ------------ (eth4) RT2 (eth0) -------- users RT1 - Slackware router RT2 - Slackware router Delay between Test PC and ISP is approx 450 ms. I have the following shapers

Greetings, My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I understand it, there are 3 classes: 1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit 1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit 1:30 - bulk/default low priority

Hello, I wrote a simple traffic shaping script (below) that should have allowed me to shape my internet traffic a bit (ppp0 - adsl 128kbit/64kbit; local interface eth0). The script works only partially - the speed is being limited but too much. Without running this script my download rate is about 10kBytes (with second computer also downloading at about 6kBytes). After running it my download speed

Hi, i need configure traffic shaper limting a traffic to IP.... for sample: In my lan i have 10 user and i need limit to 10 ips = 30k fot each ip/user. Anyone know if can i this?? where i find more information about? tks

Hello everyone, I'm looking for a bandwidth shaper that can limit downloads from certain IPs on a LAN. Any suggestions? I'm thinking of something that's easy to set up and configure. Even better if there's already a package that's on the CentOS repositories (or if not, maybe an RPM). Thanks and best regards, Matt -- Stand before it and there is no beginning. Follow it and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi there, what''s difference between wonder shaper and htb/tc? http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ please advice. regards, /vicky -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBfuS9pbZvCIJx1bcRAl27AKCldJljOgC89SPKAmPMM4Vwitc3IACdFS3s

Hey, I was fiddling with wonder shaper and it works great, except in my situation I only have 1 real network interface and the other interface is a virtual interface ie eth0:0, and tc doesn''t seem to support that. I have 2 subnets, one of which goes to the router which then goes to the internet, and the other subnet which contains the rest of the computers which go through this server

I am just starting on the list! I have a little question: I tried Wonder Shaper and i love it! The uploads no more mess with my downloads. Now i really can get all of my ADSL! But, i run wondershaper manually everytime when system reboots: ./wshaper I use RH8 and here dont have a /etc/ppp/ip-up.d to put the configuration file, like README say to me to do. Somone know where i need to put it? Or

Hi all! I'm trying to make a transparent shaper with kernel 2.6.11 I have done this and used it many times on 2.4.25 kernel and ebtables-brnf-5_vs_2.4.25.diff On 2.4.25 I have been using U32 classifiers and HTB. On 2.6.11 even with : newserver ~ # zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i BRIDGE_NETFILTER CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y newserver ~ # ls /proc/sys/net/bridge/ bridge-nf-call-arptables

Hi there, I have two questions: 1) In the following setup: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 128Kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:10 classid 1:11 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 128Kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:10 classid 1:12 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 128Kbit I have observed

Hello everyone, I just found very strange problem. I have a big class with 5500 KBit bandwidth, and a lot of smaller for which this one is their parent. Some of them are with rate 64 and ceil 1024 and other are with rate 256 and ceil pceil (5500). All filters are using mark from iptables. The strange thing is that noone can get more of about 60% of its ceil even if the parent class is almost

Greetings, I am trying to set up Wonder Shaper to work along with Shorewall 2.0.8. I have read through this document here: http://shorewall.net/traffic_shaping.htm and set the necessary options in shorewall.conf, and I coped the contents of the htb file to tcstart and changed things in accordance with the readme. Now from what im seeing, that''s all there is to it and it should work,

Dear All I am a newbie to traffic control and i am trying to setup bandwidth restriction in my local network as well as internet access to users. I got around 60 pcs in my lab and i am planning to divide bandwidth based on classes. I am using iptables to mark packets and then route the traffic to the specified class. Following is the network setup Two network cards in the server eth0

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

Hello, I have wrote some scripts to shape about 1000 workstations. My config: Pentium IV - 2GHz, 1Gb RAM, RedHat Enterprise Advanced Server 3, kernel 2.4.21-9.EL, iproute-2.4.7-11.30E.1 2 Gigabit Lan cards in bridge mode. I use htb. Everything work fine, but I have troubles with showing running configuration. # Init shaper root for dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 2: htb default 200