similar to: Qdisc requeue should be void?

This patch updates the network emulation packet scheduler. * name changed from delay to netem since it does more than just delay * Catalin''s merged code to do packet reordering * uses a socket queue''s directly rather than layering on qdisc(fifo) because this is used in performance tests. * adds placeholder in API for future enhancements (rate and duplicate).

hi i tried the example given on the examples page to duplicate selected traffic like tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 3: netem duplicate 40% tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 3 u32 match ip dst 11.0.2.2 flowid 1:3 when i ping from 11.0.2.2 to this interface my machine hangs. the same thing works for drop or delay. i would

I notice one other small problem with my modified version of SFQ. The fact that packets can be dropped at dequeue time is incompatible with the way HTB (and probably CBQ and others modeled on it) keep statistics. When I fill a low rate queue causing packets to expire and be dropped at dequeue I get interesting statistics like this: This is my variant of SFQ qdisc plfq 8016: dev eth1 ... Sent

I read the sched/qdiscs code from kernel source ... and I have some questions : When the .enqueue, .dequeue, .drop, .requeue functions are called ? What is the event that triggers them and how often this event apears ( per second ? ) ? When a qdisc is dequeued ( when it''s limit is reached ) ? Thanks _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Okay, here is a very simple QOS scheduler that delays packets for 2.6. It is good for testing, and might be useful for people who want to put some class of traffic into a "penalty box". Alexey''s tc command is really easy to extend to new disciplines. There is a version which knows about this scheduler at: http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/iproute2-delay.tar.bz2 The

The delay scheduler dequeue routine has some code cut&pasted from the TBF scheduler that caused a race with E1000 when ring got full. It looks like net schedulers should never be calling netif_queue_stopped because the queue may get unstopped by interrrupt or receive soft irq (NAPI) which races with the dequeue in the transmit scheduler. Also, if requeuing the packet fails, it is probably

I thought I had this all worked out, but it seems not. The following tc configuration: tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: tbf rate 120kbit burst 1200 limit 1 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: prio bands 3 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 20 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 20 tc

If delay scheduler decides not to send the packet right away, it requeues it. If the requeue fails, it should go and look again rather than waking up prematurely. Same patch should apply to both 2.6 and 2.4 Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> diff -Nru a/net/sched/sch_delay.c b/net/sched/sch_delay.c --- a/net/sched/sch_delay.c 2004-06-17 15:19:07 -07:00 +++

Hi, I am using netem to add loss and then adding another qdisc within netem according to the wiki. Then i want to change the netem drop probability without having to delete the qdisc and recreate it. I try it but I get invalid argument: thorium-ini hedpe # tc qdisc add dev ath0 root handle 1:0 netem drop 1% thorium-ini hedpe # tc qdisc add dev ath0 parent 1:1 handle 10: xcp capacity 54Mbit

I''m trying to simulate a satellite link to a Linux server to test application performance. I haven''t used any of the tc stuff before, but I blandly assured people it would be "easy" to set up a simulated long thin pipe on a spare network interface. However, now that I''m exploring, it''s proving quite difficult. Let me start with the general question

Hi, I am using iproute2 to setup fowarding, adding routes like "ip route add 192.168.1.3 via 192.168.1.2" I was wondering where in the kernel I can insert probabilistic packet loss only for forwarded packets? So that for instance I can drop 5% of all forwarded packets? I don''t need help with the actual code, just need help finding where to insert this code :) Thanks! George

I''m trying to build a wan latency test environment, where packets from different "remote" locations get delayed by different amounts of time, depending on which remote location we''re pretending they are from. Currently, I''m doing this using the ''prio'' qdisc to obtain multiple bands, and hanging a different netem qdisc off each of the branches

Hello All Its first time i posting to this mail list :). I have done something (maybe) important. I write new IMQ device driver based from Martin Devera and Patrick McHardy implementation with device EOS support. My current implementation supporting only egress trafic shaping and kernel 2.4.25. For more details, source and examples have look at my page http://hyperfighter.jinak.cz/qos Ill

Hi, I''m trying to set up 15 different delay intervals for packets leaving on an interface, using netems hanging off of a 16-band prio. I''m having trouble adding anything to bands higher than 10. Here''s what I tried: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 16 \ priomap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I want all default traffic to go to

Dear all, I''m now developing the qos mechanism on my mechine. I have read the documents of both the web site "HTB Home" and "lartc.org". But it confuses me that what is the accurate definition of the argument "rate"? It seems to be "the minimum rate which is guaranteed for a class" in the user guide of HTB Home, but in the manpage of lartc.org

Hi, I am new to kernel programming. My task is to route packets from different hosts through one single token bucket filter as we are trying to model a wireless scenario with many hosts communicating and sharing the same bandwidth.So the idea we came up with was to route packets from different hosts to user space using Netfilter and then send them through a common tbf implemented in user space in

i doubt about ruleset in mastershaper demo about why use hfsc at leaf class but inner class use htb??? how different for manage traffic like it???? /bin/false qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1: root htb default 1 /bin/false class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2048Kbit ######### Incoming Rules ######### chain HB /bin/false class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128Kbit ceil

Our system sets up multiple connections. At times, packets can be transmitted for some connections but not others. With that in mind: 1. Is it possible to have multiple output queues in a qdisc, rather than one? 2. Can a packet that leaves qdisc be returned to qdisc if it cannot be transmitted? If so, how? Thank you. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Hi all. I need a sanity check. I''m trying to setup my network to handle VoIP. I''m thinking that all I need to do is prioritize the realtime traffic above the interactive and bulk traffic. I see so much discussion about traffic shapping, but I don''t THINK this is needed, right? I understand the problem with bandwidth starvation, but for my application, the voip

Hi, in a project i must degrade the voip/video, i know to do latency (tbf), but i don''t know how to create jitter. I want to do it on a router/bridge and not the generating equipment. Any have a idea, or know a piece of code that do it? Thanks Ciprian