similar to: Sum multiple columns individually

Hi LLVM-Devs, I have managed to complete updating our sources from LLVM v4.0 to v5.0, but I am getting selection errors for 'callseq_end'. I am aware that the 'ADJCALLSTACKUP' and 'ADJCALLSTACKDOWN' patterns have changed, and have added an additional argument to the TD descriptions for these. There are interactions with 'ISD::CALL' and 'ISD::RET_FLAG',

Hi Martin, Pseudo CALLSEQ_START was changed in r302527, commit message contains details on the changes. However CALLSEQ_END was not modified. If your made changes to ADJCALLSTACKUP to add additional argument, that may result in error. Thanks, --Serge 2017-09-15 19:09 GMT+07:00 Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi LLVM-Devs, > > I have managed

Hi Serge, Thanks for your help. I have looked at the change log, and so far as I can tell, my implementation is pretty much identical to all of the in-tree targets, but I’m missing something and can’t see what it is. I have simplified my TD description to just: def MyCallseqStart : SDNode<"ISD::CALLSEQ_START", SDCallSeqStart<[SDTCisVT<0, i32>,

Hello, I have data frame like the one created below, ##input data Person <- c(1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2) Amount <- c(100,10,100,10,100,10,50,150) Date <- c("12/01/2012", "12/01/2012", "01/01/2013","01/01/2013","02/01/2013","02/01/2013","12/01/2012","12/01/2012") df <- data.frame(Person,Amount,Date) I would

Hi, I''d like to do a "find_by_sql" without a model (e.g. <model name>.find_by_sql("...")) as the results I get back are a once off special, and I''m happy to handle them as an array. How do I do this? "ActiveRecord::Base.find_by_sql(...)" does not seem to work? Background - At the moment I''m doing within a model <model_name>,

Hello, I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a bug in the implementation. The affected function is ExpandShiftWithUnknownAmountBit in LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp.

I''m trying to get some stats from my database about my model, and I''m not sure how to go about it. If I have a model ''foo'' that has an attribute ''color'' and I want to get some counts on this I could use the sql: SELECT color, COUNT(*) AS count FROM items GROUP BY status which would return something like: +--------+-------+ | color |

I know ActiveRecord doesn''t support composite primary keys, but I need to use one, and I need it ASAP. I don''t need any composite foreign keys, luckily; what I have is a table that stores old versions of rows in another table, so the composite key is an id + date stamp. Would someone tell me a hack I can use to support this? -- View this message in context:

JdL> I've always been afraid to ask, but here goes... JdL> What's the advantage of GUEST_SESSSETUP being a compile time parameter, JdL> instead of having it as an smb.conf parameter? I'd like to second this question! Also, just in case that it will not become an smb.conf parameter: can't it be added as a comment to the Makefile (probably near the comments to

Hello list, I''ve had this problem for two days now. Perhaps someone here would care to comment on it. I''d be REALLY appreciative if that''d be the case. Basically, it''s outlined at this paste: http://rafb.net/paste/results/ kXQSHZ83.html But I''ll paste it here, too. The main problem is in the customers/list action. The problem is with this line:

All of a sudden I can no longer ssh into my server running CentOS 4.5 This is what happens: [john at lt-131-jdl-f7 ~]$ ssh -Y -p 2222 192.168.0.1 john at 192.168.0.1's password: Connection to 192.168.0.1 closed by remote host. Connection to 192.168.0.1 closed. And yes, the account does exist and the password is correct! Looking at the logs, I see this: Jun 7 18:51:37 moray1

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using > LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers > wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit > shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a

Hi all, I have the following inside of an AR class definition: relationships=ActiveRecord::Base.connection.select_all(my_relationships_sql) relationships.each do |relationship| has_many RelatedItems, :class_name => relationship[''RelatedClass''], :foreign_key => relationship[''ForeignKey''] end This kind of works, but how can I assign the name of the

I was trying to do SUM based mySQL query simliar to the following: SELECT SUM(updated_on - created_on) AS total from signups If I were to run this command in the mySQL console I would get a result. However, if I were to run it using the following command in Rails: Signup.find_by_sql("SELECT SUM(updated_on - created_on) AS total from signups") The query that is written to the log is:

Is there any scalable alternative to iterating all the records of a certain model? #find_all seems to load everything into memory. With 500.000 records it will be a swap storm. Pedro.

Hi, I want to retrieve the set of key & values which returns from a stored procedure : connection.select_all "exec common.dbo.scr_lookupric ''AAP.N'' ". The results i want to display in a view screen call result.rhtml. Please help me out ASAP. Thanks in advance. joshua... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

It would be very helpful if the core team could define and document the expected behavior of DatabaseStatements.execute(). The implementations appear to vary. Most adapters will return some sort of native result set, SQL Server returns nil and expects a block, DB2 and Sybase return the affected row count. So please, will someone in core explain the expected behavior and can the execute()

Hi, I''ve a model with the following method: def self.run(sql) return connection.select_all(sql) end so, the value returned is an array of hashes... the problen is that the sql command: "select name, id from table" and select id,name from table" returns the columns in the same order (name, id). And in my view, I need to keep the order of the SQL command.

Is there any easy way to encrypt the URL params that is seen in the URL. I dont feel comfortable exposing the id of the models to the external user. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Running CentOS 4.5. I would think this should be simple, but I can't find a package for the above. Any pointers? JDL