similar to: Ingress rate

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

Hi! By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ. There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20 Why I see 3 pkts in default 1:30? How explain it? ### imq0: queueing disciplines qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 30 direct_packets_stat 0 Sent 631429 bytes 1812 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 20) ### imq0: traffic classes class htb 1:20 root prio 0 rate 100Kbit ceil

Hello everybody, sorry for bothering you, but after some hours, I''m stuck. I''m living in a student''s foundation where I want to connect lots of people to a tiny DSL link. We have exactly four types of traffic. We want a really hard PRIO solution (as I promised to someone that group X will only use the link capacity which isn''t used by group Y). I could make a

Hi all, Here is something that i still haven''t understood. When installing PRIO, it creates 3 "classes" with priority level according to the TOS. That command line : # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio give that result : # tc qd sh qdisc prio 1: dev eth0 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 How should i read that priomap, what does it mean and how to

Hello one more time, As others seem to already asked without reply, I''m getting lower speed rates than specified via ingress. How do I know. Because I have this in my script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress # Filter intranet traffic, so fit it to intranet speed tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \ match ip src $Q_2_HOSTS \ match ip dst

Hello, i try to limit the incoming traffic rate using the ingress qdisc, but it does not work for me. Here is what i have done: # sudo tc qdisc add dev eth1 ingress # tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 172.17.0.101/32 police rate 10kbit buffer 10k drop The ingress qdisc is there: # tc -s qdisc show dev eth1 qdisc pfifo_fast 0: bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1

I have two interfaces, eth0 and eth1 but i can''t discern the egress traffic than ingress traffic. I need to apply htb qdisc in both directions, and I read that I need the IMQ patch to do this, because in ingress qdisc i can''t apply htb qdisc...but where is the ingress qdisc? affect the traffic that goes from eth0 to eth1 or is for the traffic that goes from eth1 to eth0?

Hello, i noticed that the ingress qdisc is not working properly anymore in 3.0.4-1 (back in 3.0.2 the ingress qdisc was working for me): Install the ingress qdisc to peth0: # tc add qdisc dev peth0 ingress ... generate some traffic ... # tc -s qdisc show dev peth0 qdisc pfifo_fast 0: bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sent 324884 bytes 1749 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues

Hello, I am trying to revive an old linux server installation, which still has libc5. Sadly, most current software does not compile anymore on this system, including the tc utility. As with other tools (net-tools, coreutils, procps etc.) I tried to compile and statically link (LDFLAGS=-static) on a more recent linux machine and copy the static binaries over to the old machine. But no luck

I had a linux wireless router. I would like to monitor the queue lengh of the wireless interface. By default, the wifi0 interface is with pfifo_fast qdisc which does not report backlog packet. I replaced pfifo_fast with pfifo: ''tc qdisc replace dev wifi0 root pfifo'' Then I use iperf to send UDP pkts faster than the interface can handle but when I read the qdisc, the result is

Hi list! I have a LAN server with Gentoo Linux. It''s a Pentium III at 1000 MHz with 256 MB SDRAM. I''ve implemented a QoS solution with HTB and SFQ. Here is the diagram: _______________________________________________________________________ 1:--+----1:1 - [ counter-strike & icmp ] rate=1Mbit; ceil=1Mbit; | prio 0; (u32 filter

I have a Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.11) server. Several months ago, I made a traffic shaping setup for my box (running a 2.4 kernel then) that worked beautifully. It gave high priority to SSH and RealAudio traffic, and put HTTP downloading traffic on a lower prio so they could only use what bandwidth was left. However, I''ve only just realized that tc is no longer accepting the commands I

Hi all I started playing with tcng to generate my tc rules, but I have some difficulty implementing my rules... The script below generates an error: # Device eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress beginner.tc:2: don''t know how to build meter for this The script is below, I changed the real IP numbers for XXs and YYs, since it doesn''t really matter what they are. eth0 is the

Hi routing-experts ! If I want to prioritize up ssh and telnet traffic with Linux 2.4 netfilter and iproute2. I''ve set outbound tcp 22, 23 and 21 TOSbits to minimize delay, but this doesn''t seem to be enough to prioritize ssh over for example http-traffic. I''m using modem to connect to Internet and got an entire LAN behind the Linux router/firewall. Well, I think most

Hi, I would like to prioritize VOIP traffic when we use the phone, but other times not do traffic shaping at all. Right now I have my openwrt router set up with htb to do shaping. In order to get it to work well I had to set my upload and download speeds much lower than my line speed. With these settings, I get good VOIP reception even while surfing the net and doing a long download. However,

Hi list, I have a quick question about the priority mapping of tos bits. The manpage of tc-prio shows a nice table with tos bits and the band they are mapped to: TOS Bits Means Linux Priority Band ------------------------------------------------------------ 0x0 0 Normal Service 0 Best Effort 1 0x2 1 Minimize Monetary Cost 1 Filler

how can i get rid of that ?? i do del roots before scripting. -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl | *[JID]:tdi@gentoo.pl|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:#gentoo-pl@freenode | *[MAIL]:tdi@pozman.pl|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl | *Serwery,administracja,webapps - www.ProAdmin.com.pl | *Fingerprint:43E21CC46DAFD2F754E91547D59B39F56AAA4B5F

Hi,lartc I used iproute-060110 with iptables1.3.4 on gentoo 2005r1 kernel 2.6.14-5. I find some error messages in system logfile: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 10010 is big. Consider r2q change. tcf_action_init_1: successfull police HTB: quantum of class 20001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 20020 is big. Consider

Dovid Bender writes: > Just guessing I would verify that the out of : iptables -L -nv > Shows no dropped packets, try disabling selinux as well as look at the > limits of the asterisk pid (cat /proc/<Asterisk PID>/limits). I know the > defualt for rhel is 1024 which was never enough for us. Thanks for the hints. Selinux is disabled, there is no outgoing firewall (anymore)

Hi, what is needed to activate ingress policies for enterprise server 9! My current loaded modules: in the attachments my kernel: Linux linux 2.6.5-7.97-smp #1 SMP Fri Jul 2 14:21:59 UTC 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So you can see the module sch_ingress is loaded and also the package iprout2 is installed. I have set also a filter for ingress policies but i don`t think it is working,