similar to: question about code reuse and session variables

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "question about code reuse and session variables"

2007 Jan 16
4
question about sessions and code re-use
hey there, i have a simple model called key_words.rb the purpose of this is to hold system config data. it also holds the parameters that our system uses to judge the condition of the stuff we monitor. anyway, one of the methods is this def self.get_in_wet_list(status) wet_list = find(:first, :conditions => "name = ''wet_list'' ")
2016 Oct 03
0
On implementing zero-overhead code reuse
Martin, thanks for that example. It's definitely eye-opening, and very good to know. The installation business, however, is still a killer for me. Of course, it's a trivial step in a simple example like the one you showed. But consider this scenario: suppose I perform an analysis that I may publish in the future, so I commit the project's state at the time of the analysis, and tag
2007 Apr 27
0
Error: An unusual circumstance has arisen in the nesting of readline input
Hi, If I have warnings converted to errors, and if I plot a simple plot and then resize and move the plot's window many times, I eventually get an error "Display list redraw incomplete", and after a while an endlessly repeating error "An unusual circumstance has arisen in the nesting of readline input". I cannot stop it using Ctrl-C (Ctrl-Z works though). I'm
2002 Mar 01
0
Refresh x11 window in non-interactive session
R community, I am running a non-interactive R session to plot results from an external program. R's X11 graphics window does not redraw itself after it has been covered by another window. Any ideas on how to make the window refresh itself automatically? Thanks. - - David Dahl -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read
2006 Aug 13
1
Eclipse 3.2 with JVM 1.5.08
(Yes, I know that there's a version for Linux. I'm even using it!) here the bug report for a simple start: bojan@linux:~/Desktop/Downloads/eclipse> wine /home/bojan/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/Java/jdk1.5.0_08/bin/java -jar startup.jar fixme:msg:PeekMessageW PM_QS_xxxx flags (0040) are not handled fixme:oleacc:CreateStdAccessibleObject 0x2003a -4
2009 Mar 29
1
X session lockup (CentOS 4.7)
I just had a very odd incident with my session locking up, so I thought I'd describe it to see if it rings any bells with anyone. Background: I shut down my machine last night for Earth Hour, so the last thing I did before logging out was exit Firefox3, telling it to save my open tab state. When I turned the system back on and started FF3 again, it installed new versions of three plugins (I
2016 Jan 13
3
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > >> I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with >> replacing MIPS SYNC with lightweight SYNCs (SYNC_WMB etc)? > Of course. If you cannot explain the semantics of the primitives you > introduce, how can we judge the patch. >
2016 Jan 13
3
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > >> I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with >> replacing MIPS SYNC with lightweight SYNCs (SYNC_WMB etc)? > Of course. If you cannot explain the semantics of the primitives you > introduce, how can we judge the patch. >
2016 Jan 13
0
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with > replacing MIPS SYNC with lightweight SYNCs (SYNC_WMB etc)? Of course. If you cannot explain the semantics of the primitives you introduce, how can we judge the patch. This barrier business is hard enough as it is, but magic unexplained hardware
2016 Jan 14
0
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:58:22PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > > >>I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with > >>replacing MIPS SYNC with lightweight SYNCs (SYNC_WMB etc)? > >Of course. If you cannot
2016 Jan 14
0
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On 01/14/2016 08:16 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:04:45PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:58:22PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: >>> On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: >>>> >>>>> I ask HW team about it but I have
2016 Jan 14
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:04:45PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:58:22PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > > > > >>I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with > >
2016 Jan 14
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:04:45PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:58:22PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > > > > >>I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with > >
2016 Jan 27
1
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:33:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > If it turns out that some architecture does actually need a barrier > between a read and a dependent write, then that will mean that > > (a) we'll have to make up a _new_ barrier, because > "smp_read_barrier_depends()" is not that barrier. We'll presumably > then have to make that new barrier
2016 Jan 27
1
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:33:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > If it turns out that some architecture does actually need a barrier > between a read and a dependent write, then that will mean that > > (a) we'll have to make up a _new_ barrier, because > "smp_read_barrier_depends()" is not that barrier. We'll presumably > then have to make that new barrier
2012 Sep 09
1
Error msg in rpanel
I am working on the r panel package. Now if i have a function that uses a radiogroup button, and if i attempt to run the function from inside the rpanel menu, i get this error: Error in panel$intname : $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors However if i run the function per se i.e. not from inside the rpanel menu, but by calling it independently, the above error doesn't appear. Here is a
2011 Mar 16
0
[GIT PULL] elflink changes
Hi, I picked up the following patches from Liu Aleaxander that he sent to the mailing list last year. They add some new features to the command line interface code and fix a couple of bugs. The following changes since commit 9ded45991b4fc83b40af963feb773ddca2589d74: ldlinux: Parse and store the "onerror" command line (2011-03-09 14:32:36 +0000) are available in the git repository
2016 May 04
1
R process killed when allocating too large matrix (Mac OS X)
> Can you elaborate on "leads to R being killed"? You should tell to the killer not to do it again :). Hi Simon! Sure, but who do you tell it if you don't know the killer? This is all the killer left me with, the 'crime scene' if you like :-) > m <- matrix(0, 90000, 100000) Killed: 9 My colleague Wayne Oldford also tried it on his Mac machine and apparently the
2016 May 05
0
R process killed when allocating too large matrix (Mac OS X)
On May 4, 2016, at 9:00 PM, Marius Hofert <marius.hofert at uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > thanks for your quick reply. > > 1) ... so you can reproduce this? Yes, I can on 10.11.4. > 2) Do you know a way how this can be 'foreseen'? We allocate larger > matrices in the copula package depending on the user's input > dimension. It would be good to
2018 Nov 07
0
XPS 13 9370 / CentOS compat
On 11/7/18 7:28 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Am 07.11.2018 um 15:15 schrieb Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>: >> On 11/3/18 12:32 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >>> Anyone with some Dell laptop XPS 13 9370 (2018) experience here? >>> Especially with that "Killer 1435 (802.11ac 2x2 und Bluetooth)" device? >>> Supported by the stock