similar to: Internal Qdisc

I'm not sure. Perhaps Jeff Cohen knows as he wrote this. Reid. On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 11:51, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Is it necessary to use the VC6.1+ `__time64_t' type instead of __time_t in > win32/TimeValue.cpp? > > --------------- > In file included from > c:/projects/src/llvm-1/llvm/lib/System/TimeValue.cpp:51: >

>which version of makeinfo are you running? 4.8 Hi Henrik, The new release 1.5 has fixed that now. I am getting through to step 9 of the CFEBuildInst instructions. But 'llvm-ranlib libiberty.a' is failing so is 'make check' :( Aaron

Hello, I''m still new in using tc...I wanna ask... 1. what is the difference between classless and classful qdisc?? when I made a qdisc, are I must create both of that qdisc...??? 2. what is the difference beetween three of the classless qdisc in linux redhat 2.4, sfq pfifo and tbf if I using the htb classful qdisc ??? because when I use htb classful qdisc it means I made a qdisc that

Hi, Is it necessary to use the VC6.1+ `__time64_t' type instead of __time_t in win32/TimeValue.cpp? --------------- In file included from c:/projects/src/llvm-1/llvm/lib/System/TimeValue.cpp:51: c:/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-1-1/lib/System/platform/TimeValue.cpp: In member function `std::string llvm::sys::TimeValue::toString() const':

Hi, Is there something wrong with my llvm-gcc compiler?: ------------------------ GNU C version 3.4-llvm 20030924 (experimental) (mingw32) compiled by GNU C version 3.4.1 (mingw special). GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 c:/projects/src/llvm-4/llvm/runtime/libtrace/tracelib.c:54: error: syntax error before "PRIMES"

Hi, >But 'llvm-ranlib libiberty.a' is failing so is 'make check' :( 'llvm-ranlib libiberty.a' is optional. I don't know the status of make check on Cygwin. Perhaps Reid or Chris could tell us more about that? Henrik > >Aaron > > >_______________________________________________ >LLVM Developers mailing list >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu

There is an design problem with the qdisc interface that causes qlen related bugs in netem, tbf, and other qdisc''s that peek at the top of the queue. The problem is that requeue needs to be called from the dequeue function but requeue can fail. If requeue fails, then the calling qdisc can not properly handle the error. If it returns NULL, then the parent''s expectation about qlen

Hi, Having issues getting a replace command working correctly. The error reported is "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument" which isn''t descriptive or helpful. The command i''m running is: tc qdisc replace dev ppp0 parent 8001:D handle D: tbf rate 5Kbit burst 5kb latency 70ms The idea being to replace an sfq with handle D and hopefully limit a certain user in my

Hi guys, i have a little doubt ; I have eth0 ethernet and eth1 wireless , and they are bridged in br0 Is there any difference in the behavior between do tc qdisc add dev br0 root sfq OR tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq && tc qdisc add dev eth1 root sfq -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > Is there something wrong with my llvm-gcc compiler?: > c:/projects/src/llvm-4/llvm/runtime/libtrace/tracelib.c:54: warning: type > defaults to `int' in declaration of `PRIMES' > c:/projects/src/llvm-4/llvm/runtime/libtrace/tracelib.c:56: warning: data > definition has no type or storage class It looks like that file had

On Thu, 5 May 2005, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Chris, > Chris Lattner wrote: >> For anyone who is interested: >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/pubs/2005-05-04-LattnerPHDThesis.html > > many congrats, and best wishes for the future! Thanks all! > And I hope you still will have some time to look after LLVM and won't > get too distracted by some new exciting other

On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > The 'pthread_once' is located in the native library binary file: > /usr/lib/libpthread.a. I've also included the path to the library in > LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH environment variable. If libpthread.a is a static library, lli won't be successful loading it. Try relinking lli, but add this to its tools/lli/Makefile: TOOLLINKOPTS :=

>You're welcome to join me. Say when you're ready to dig... I'll join in at some point, if that is okay. I'd like to get LLVM working on MinGW running as well as Cygwin. Aaron

> I'm not sure if dejagnu is installed correctly. Is there any way to call it > on the command line? > > I get this: > ------------------- > $ runtest --version | tee -a my_runtest.log > WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. > Expect version is 5.21 > Tcl version is 8.0 > Framework version is 1.4.4 > ------------------- It looks

I thought I had this all worked out, but it seems not. The following tc configuration: tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: tbf rate 120kbit burst 1200 limit 1 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: prio bands 3 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 20 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 20 tc

Hello lartc I wrote a scheduling qdisc that works on a per-flow basis. It dequeue packets according to a flow interval. But as it turns out there is a problem with it. The qdisc loads just fine and is working correctly. The problem is that if the qdisc is removed and loaded again, it stops responding. By that I mean it stops to enqueue packets to the underlying Qdisc. "tc -d qdisc

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

Hi, I'm able to build the llvm tools on the MinGW platform: burg, fpcmp, tblgen, llvm-as, llvm-dis, opt, gccas, llc, llvm-link, lli, gccld, llvm-stub, analyze and extract. I wonder if these tools are sufficient to start build the cfrontend? Henrik. _________________________________________________________________ Undg� pop-ups med MSN Toolbar - http://toolbar.msn.dk hent den gratis!

now, i''m learning and try to read a lot of article about tc command in linux for setting traffic shaper. but i''m doubt about In the theory about tc command ... In general, we define class under root qdisc but Is it can be possible ???? If we define another qdisc under root qdisc, Can i do it? because i have just read tc command syntax and i found this point ... syntax: tc qdisc

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and