similar to: Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 2, Issue 40

Hello! I have two questions regarding SWAT. 1) Where is the logout button? 2) How can I set administrative privileges for a user ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And a problem with samba: I run gentoo linux, the test version and since my last upgrade to samba-3.0.23a I can't access my server. Until yesterday WindowsXP from another

How do we check the data from Samba4 that the data from Samba3 successfully migrated? I dunno if it successfully migrated coz got these (last part): [root at gaara LiveData]# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/srv/LiveData/var_lib_samba/samba --use-xattrs=yes --realm=kazekage.sura.sandbox.local --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL /srv/smb.conf Once the above files are

I used to upgrade samba3 to samba4 with almost successful with one problem, administrator can't access. As administrator, by default it is the only user account that is given full control over the system. My query is how to change the administrator password? we have one account which can join to the samba 4 AD based on the migrated data but the problem can't change the administrator or

Hi I have Linux box (Debian) that acting as a bridge. Eth0 and Eth1 are bridged (br0). Br0 have public IP. Eth0 connects to the internet. Eth1 connect to servers in DMZ (with public IPs). Eth2 connects my Lan (192.168.1.0/24). My connections is 2Mbit/2Mbit. I want to limit upload speed for each service on each server in DMZ, but also for users on my Lan. The same for

Trying to think this through, hope someone can lend a hand. I have 3 eths I want to bond together and that seems simple enough. eth0,1,2 <-> bond0 , though not sure how this would be for multiple ip addresses needed for the virtual machines... perhaps eth:0, eth:1 etc....to bond0:1, bond0:2 ? then I want to bridge to my virtual machines.... I am going to be using virtual machines, each

Hello Mates, I am facing a really weird issue with my mail server, somehow I cannot connect using port 993. It works with 143 but not 993 nor 995. Here is a little bit of more information: # telnet localhost 143 Trying ::1... telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+

I''ve had a shorewall firewall protecting my home network for almost 3 years now which is currently on a RedHat 7.3 box and I''m running version 1.4.7 I''m replacing this box with a newer one and have set it up with Gentoo linux and the 2.6.9-r9 kernel and installed Gentoo''s distro of shorewall which is version 2.0.7. I have also compiled the needed netfilter

Hello Mates, I just reciently updated BIND on my CentOS 6.2 (don't remember which version) but now I am using version: BIND version 9.8.2 The packages I have: bind bind-libs bind-chroot bind-utils bind-devel First of all, doing "service named status" it throws me: WARNING: key file (/etc/rndc.key) exists, but using default configuration file (/etc/rndc.conf) rndc: connection to

Hi I have a small lan (10.0.0.0/8) behind my linux box. I use MASQUERADE to allow users connects to internet. I set up an esfq qdisc for outgoing traffic. And there is a little question. Does source hash type in esfq recognize NATed local ip''s? -- Pozdrawiam Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing

Hi, I''m interested to write rules direct in Kernel space memory and not to execute the tc command. Have anyone done this before ? Any ideas ? Sources ? Thank you, Liviu -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Hello, I have a problem with a LDAP backed based Samba PDC. Last week, due an hardware problem, I lost my primary LDAP server and PDC. I reinstalled the LDAP server and populated it with the old data, I also reinstalled Samba. The problem is that I can't log in to samba as root (cn=root,dc=info,dc=uvt,dc=ro). All others user accounts ar working except root. Eg.:

Hi I have Linux box (Debian) that acting as a bridge. Eth0 and Eth1 are bridged (br0). Br0 have public IP. Eth0 connects to the internet. Eth1 connect to servers in DMZ (with public IPs). Eth2 connects my Lan (192.168.1.0/24). My connections is 2Mbit/2Mbit. I''m doing SNAT for my Lan. QoS on eth0 works fine for DMZ, but is there a possibility to doing QoS on

Witam I''ve found many examples where packets are redirected to IMQ device in PREROUTING chain for ingress traffic shaping purposes. But is there any sense in redirecting packets to IMQ in FORWARD chain also for ingress traffic shaping purposes? -- Pozdrawiam Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl _______________________________________________ LARTC

######################################################### PACT-2016: Call for Abstracts in ACM Student Research Competition (SRC) http://pact2016.eew.technion.ac.il/acm-src ######################################################### IMPORTANT DATES Abstract submission: 11:59pm US EDT Friday, June 17, 2016 Acceptance notification: 11:59pm US EDT Friday, July 15, 2016 Poster

current content below is annotated by some suggestions of things to add along with questions for those who know more than I do [in brackets] ================ # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu This calculates the proper MSS for your link. [If I understand the code correctly ... - expert intervention invited] More precisely, this sets the

Hi I share my bandwith (adsl 512/128) between 12 users. I set up simple qos script for incoming (IMQ) and outgoing traffic using htb in root, 4 classess and esfq qdisc at leafs. Interactive traffic goeas to class1 , http,mail etc. to class2, p2p, ftp to class3, and rest to class4. Classess divide link in proportion 20% (prio 1), 40% (prio 2), 20% (prio 3) ,20% (prio 4) This works

> > Message: 6 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:44:42 +0200 From: Michal Soltys > <nozo@ziu.info> Subject: Re: [LARTC] I''m having an issue with u32 > masking To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Message-ID: > <46EF8FFA.6070707@ziu.info> Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Vadtec wrote: >> > Is this how tc is supposed to work? Does it only

There are some notes written by Jamal that come with the iproute2 source that describe some very significant features that are not even hinted at in the lartc document. They aren''t real easy to run across if you don''t know they exist and even when I did first see them, I wasn''t sure if they represented the current state of things. I also ran across IMQ and it took me a

Hi, I''ve tried to reproduce the example from section 4.1 (simple source policy routing) but without success. The setup is the same as in the example, with only two differences: there is additionally a gre tunnel which doesn''t seem to disturb here, and one interface does not masquerade at all, as it''s thought to be used from the router only. Besides that, and the

> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:06:08 -0400 > From: Kevin White <kwhite@telsource.com> > Subject: [LARTC] Two upstream gateways, only use one unless it fails? > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Message-ID: <4525D630.1040401@telsource.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I''m looking at setting up a system with