similar to: About sockets in "CLOSING" state

Hello, I was attempting to throttle egress traffic to a specific rate using a tbf. As a starting point I used an example from the LARTC howto, which goes: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 I then attempt a large fetch from another machine via wget (~40 megs) and the rate was clamped down to about 12Kbytes/s. As this seemed too much, I gradually increased

Hi, I have a CentOS 5.2 desktop with the RPMForge repo enabled. I just ran 'yum update', and there seems to be some trouble with the wxGTK apps. A simple 'yum update' gives this error message: --8<-------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0 is needed by package

Hello, I''am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc applies the rules but no shaping occurs. Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ? I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts the rules but

Hi all, I'm trying to use centos5 as desktop/development machine, but i having a lot of problems to compile Amule and d4X, tools that I use a lot. Somebody have some experience to do this work?? sombody have an .spec file?? thanks a lot ! JC J?nior Ps. yes I have all lib neccessari to build this tools.

I execute emule 0.47c (because Amule and mldonkey doesn't have protocol ofuscation support) but I have some problems: 1.- I import the incoming + temp directories from amule, 250 downloads inside => error too many open files. To solve this, I try to import 20 files, next 20 files more, next 20 files more, in batch process. 2.- But when I use emule, the same error appears in some files in

Hi peploe, i am new in the list, i need know, how blocked the Amule/emule in shorewall? My dist. debian version: 3.2.6-shorewall -- .~. / v \ Seja Livre, use GNU/Linux! /( )\ ^^-^^ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.

Hello everyone, I have my centos server running just fine with everything I need... except I can't setup no p2p program (amule, bittorrent, etc). Anyone some hint on which program to use and how to make it run? Thanx Samuel --- andinasoft SA - Software y Consulting --- Mariano Aguilera 216 y Almagro - Quito, Ecuador Tel. +593 2 223 5682 ----- Cel. +593 9 946 4046 ---------

hi, I am really a newbie in linux traffic control.But i have task to implement a tool similar to the nistnet tool used for netwok emulation tests but which emulates a wireless environment. I was exploring the use of the traffic control subsystem for this task.In this regard i have a few questions i need to post in order to clarify my thoughts on how to do this.I am using tcng to classify

I''m trying to fill a token bucket with enough tokens to burst several gigs of data. However, it doesn''t seem to get any higher than ~3.9GB: >tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 1440kbit latency 50ms \ burst 16000000000 >tc qdisc show dev eth0 qdisc tbf 800b: rate 1440Kbit burst 3908420240b lat 2197.8s A smaller attempt of ~1.6 gigs works just fine: >tc qdisc

ingress can be used to control the incoming packet, such as: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.11 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.22 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :2 first ,I do not sure these method can

Hi! I don;t know what i am doing wrong because i have still Low ID on aMule. I have action.AllowaMule and accept tcp 4662:4771 and udp 4672. Thanks, Mitja

Hi Everyone, This is a simple question but I don''t understand why the below tbf is not working as expected by throttling traffic to 5kbps If I throttle a PC''s traffic using the below when traffic exceeds 5kbps packets start getting dropped (as they should) but all traffic gets dropped. not just the bit over 5kbps. TC="tc add dev ppp0" $TC parent 8001:2 handle 2:

Quick question: How do I delete an ingress tbf? [root@atlas root]# tc qdisc qdisc tbf ffff: dev eth0 rate 50Kbit burst 2999b lat 1us [root@atlas root]# tc qdisc del dev eth0 ingress RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi folks. For quite a while, I tried to use linux (cbq and htb) to control bandwidth in order to replace a cisco equipment used to play this role on our network. After trying here and there, with a bunch of different distros, different versions, different compilations, ... the closest I could get was as follows: (using htb.init and cbq.init) Desired BW ==> Achieved BW 128k ==> 404.78

Probably this is an old question, but i''m not able to find nothing about... So, i''ve just started to play with tc to limit the transfer speed to my hdsl connection. I''m using the tbf and the command # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 10kbit latency 50ms burst 1000 Then i''ve tried to transfer a big (20 Mbyte) file onto my lan, using ftp and the client

EHLO tc gurus. New to traffic control. Unfortunately, the politicians here in Denmark have decided that a PC is the same as a television set - so anyone owning a PC and internet connection of over 255 kbit/s must pay DKR 2200/year = EUR 300 = USD 400 in television licence fees :-( This is a lot of money for poor students, so we want to offer the students the *option* of limiting their

We''ve just upgraded to a new firewall machine, and a new version of Shorewall. We''re now on 2.04; previous version was 1.3.9b (!). So I''m pretty sure whatever problems we''re having are related to the big version jump. We''re using config files that exactly match our old (working) configuration (IOW, these are things which _were_ working on the old

Hi, I have done this setup to give the machine 192.168.1.4 (masqueraded over dialup) the highest priority: #! /bin/bash WHAT="add" iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.4 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 4 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio bands 3 priomap 0 1 2 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 parent 1:1

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90390 Bug ID: 90390 Summary: [NV98] Modesetting causes blank screen because of INVALID_STATE [UNK0B] chid 1 mthd 0x0080 data 0x00000000 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW

This patch updates the network emulation packet scheduler. * name changed from delay to netem since it does more than just delay * Catalin''s merged code to do packet reordering * uses a socket queue''s directly rather than layering on qdisc(fifo) because this is used in performance tests. * adds placeholder in API for future enhancements (rate and duplicate).