similar to: bridge with packetrate limiter and absolute priority?

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

Hi, I am a beginner of bridge. I have a problem of using Fedora Core 2 to make a simple bridge. Here is my setup: The bridge computer is installed with Fedore Core 2 (with the SE Linux patch). As I know that kernel 2.6.5 is already support bridging by default, so I didn't recompile the kernel. Then I installed bridge-utils-0.9.6-1.i386. And no additional configuration is made. After

Hi all, This is my first post to this list. I hope someone can help me, I have been getting grey hairs trying to make this work! I have a bridge setup on a debian sarge box. The bridge is called br0 and sits between my cable modem and a non-name brand router/switch: [cable modem]----[eth1]---[br0]----[eth2]-----[no-name brand router] I have squid setup on the linux box and it works, I have

Hello, I have been using the bridging facilities provided by Linux (vanilla 2.6.7 SMP with UML skas host patch applied) to bridge a regular physical ethernet network (on interface eth0) with a virtual network (on interface tap0, cf uml_switch, http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/networking.html). A couple of virtual machines (run using user-mode linux, a tool that enables you to run linux

Hi, What is the easiest way to bridge between two user-space processes that talk directly to Ethernet interfaces? I have two applications that write/read Ethernet frames to/from Linux Ethernet ports (e.g. eth0). The applications can successfully talk to each other when they run on two machines connected over Ethernet. I would like to be able to test them on a single machine without employing

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:13:33 +0100 ncrfgs <ncrfgs@tin.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the great 802.1d Ethernet Bridging support via > brctl along with Universal TUN/TAP devices created with > openvpn on a GNU system with a vanilla 2.6.8.1 Linux > kernel. > > > To start it: > > /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br${X} > /sbin/ifconfig brX

Hi, we're running the standard linux bridge setup (redundant bridge) for 5 years now. So first of all, thanks to everyone involved for implementing the bridging feature in Linux. Now I'm trying to bridge hosts connected to VLAN'ed Cisco switches using linux bridge. I'm testing the following setup (Kernel 2.6.19, bridge-utils 1.2 on both bridges)

I have been asking on the qemu list how to get bridge network mode working under centos 4... To no avail. The following script is what I have tried as my /etc/qemu-ifup. It supposedly worked for fedora. #!/bin/sh # # qemu_up # # script to bring up the tun device in QEMU in bridged mode # # This script bridges eth0 and tap0. First take eth0 down, then bring it up with IP 0.0.0.0 # /sbin/ifdown

I want to set the DSCP at the ingress of the router. I tried the following: iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -d 10.10.10.12 -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff:0 ingress dsmark indices 64 set_tc_index tc class change dev eth0 classid ffff:1 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0xb8 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff:1 protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw classid ffff:1 But the DSCP

Hi, I've been encountering some problems with bridging under linux 2.6.12-9 (ubuntu Breezy Badger). Apologies for the newbie-ish email: problem is likely a config issues, but docs appear to be sparse and I can't find much reference to the problem/solution on the 'net; trial and error really isn't working... Am attempting to bridge an offsite network to the central

any comments? if nothing else, is there any way to atomically setup bridge? not on list, please cc. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:08:15 -0000 From: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk> To: Adam Sulmicki <adam@cfar.umd.edu>, xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] nfsroot and brige > hello, > it seems like a catch-22 to

Hi fellow traffic-shapers, I am implementing a Diffserv CORE router using Linux kernel 2.4.18. I used this excellent website (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-38.htm) using AFHTB as a starting basis for my EGRESS diffserv implementation - and all works great so far!!! But my project has an additional requirement. There are services running locally on the router which are sending/receiving IP

hi everyone, so,first it seemed a trivial question to me, but since I could not find anybody being neither able to answer this question nor giving a short config example. after a few sleepless nights and exhausting all the reading and research. here I am sharing my problem with all of you, in the hope of some possible solution/sugestion. or is it that this is impossible?? below my

Any one using qemu with centos and bridged network mode? I am running qemu as: qemu-system-x86_64 -hda centos4.i386.img -boot c -net nic -net tap I am still getting a 10.X.X.X address instead of a DHCP address on my local network. I have the /etc/qemu-ifup script as: #!/bin/sh sudo /sbin/ifconfig $1 0.0.0.0 promisc up sudo /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 $1 sleep 2 which does run.... I have kqemu

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3634 Bug ID: 3634 Summary: IPQoS default should be changed to "none" Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

Hello All, I am trying to implement OpenVPN on Fedora core Linux 3 with the latest pathces installed. This server is used only as firewall/internet gateway/proxy/VPN server, with kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 and kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 SMP It has two NIC''s eth0 (10.0.0.150) connected to ADSL, eth1 (192.168.3.12) connected to the local network. I use shorewall 2.4 on this machine. I like to test

Hi, I am in the process of conteinerization of server infrastructure, and my idea is to run telephony server appliance Trixbox under KVM (which in tuen uses QEMU codebase) on SuSE Linux. KVM networking is rather primitive, and the only way to make KVM''ed OS seen as "normal" computer is to use virtual bridge as I found on net. The questions are (based on the

I''m trying to configure 4 queues with strict priorities based on DSCP. I tried to following commands, but it seems that the filters I defined have no effect tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 4 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0 handle 10: pfifo limit 100 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 20: pfifo limit 100 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 30: pfifo limit 100 tc

I've been playing around with qemu and wanted to make the guest OS instance visible on my network. This meant getting bridging and tun/tap working. After getting things working by pasting command from the CentOS wiki article plus adding a few enhancements, I decided to capture the process in a shell script that would be suitable for a user in the sudoers file to fire off. Not sure why

So, I'm setting up my first bridge, and I'm running into an interesting issue. I have a 4 port NIC (formerly 4 seperate /29 and /28 LANs) and an onboard NIC (to my ISP). I've setup the bridge using the script included at the bottom of this email (modified from Gentoo for Aurora). When the WET11 (the WET11 is a simple ethernet to wireless bridge) is unplugged, the bridge works