similar to: Qos with 2 internet connections problems

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Qos with 2 internet connections problems"

2006 Aug 21
1
QoS on a bridge+NAT
I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe
2006 May 10
11
HTB at 100+ Mbits/sec
Hello all, I''ve been trying to test HTB performance for different link bandwidths to find potential limits and this is what I have so far: http://home.comcast.net/~msethuraman/htbtest/ Can members please go over the setup, test procedure and the results and answer a few questions? 1. Is the testing methodology okay and can the results be considered accurate? If so, is this a decent
2006 Mar 02
33
Patch to allow for the ATM "cell tax"
I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP. Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size. This is probably obvious to some of you. For the rest: ADSL uses ATM as its transport. An ATM
2004 May 06
2
imap problems
Hi, I''m really new to traffic shaping and try to implement the wshaper.htb script. I have a linux box that serves as vdr, mldonkey, samba, apache and mailserver (imap), connected to my LAN with 100mbit. I''m connected to the inet via adsl with a hardware router/firewall, got 384k downlink 64k uplink. When I have mldonkey running, imap (via Outlook) gets *very* slow (mails with
2018 Nov 22
4
[PATCH net 1/2] virtio-net: disable guest csum during XDP set
We don't disable VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM if XDP was set. This means we can receive partial csumed packets with metadata kept in the vnet_hdr. This may have several side effects: - It could be overridden by header adjustment, thus is might be not correct after XDP processing. - There's no way to pass such metadata information through XDP_REDIRECT to another driver. - XDP does not
2018 Nov 22
4
[PATCH net 1/2] virtio-net: disable guest csum during XDP set
We don't disable VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM if XDP was set. This means we can receive partial csumed packets with metadata kept in the vnet_hdr. This may have several side effects: - It could be overridden by header adjustment, thus is might be not correct after XDP processing. - There's no way to pass such metadata information through XDP_REDIRECT to another driver. - XDP does not
2005 Feb 16
10
VOIP Challenges...
Greetings - I''m new to QoS, so please be gentle (and yes, I''ve RTFM, though I don''t understand every bit of it) Here''s the thing; I''ve tried several scripts--simple and complex--for classifying my Vonage traffic into a high-priority queue, but no matter what I do it doesn''t seem to work. Right now I''m using the HTB script
2004 May 07
0
Re: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1714 - 5 msgs
Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >
2018 Mar 01
3
[PATCH net-next 0/2] virtio-net: re enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer
On 2018?03?01? 17:10, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:19:03 +0800 > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > >> This series tries to re-enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer which >> was removed since commit 7324f5399b06 ("virtio_net: disable >> XDP_REDIRECT in receive_mergeable() case"). Main concerns are: >> >>
2018 Mar 01
3
[PATCH net-next 0/2] virtio-net: re enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer
On 2018?03?01? 17:10, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:19:03 +0800 > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > >> This series tries to re-enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer which >> was removed since commit 7324f5399b06 ("virtio_net: disable >> XDP_REDIRECT in receive_mergeable() case"). Main concerns are: >> >>
2005 Feb 13
2
Problems after Kernel upgrade to 2.6.10
Greetings, I have been reading the list for a little while now, but this is the first occasion I have had to post--of course, because of a problem. My problems began when I upgraded my RedHat 9 system to 2.6.10 from source. Aside from some other booting issues and things, all of which appear to be resolved, the only things NOT working are my scripts for traffic control. I get a whole host of
2018 Mar 01
2
[PATCH net-next 0/2] virtio-net: re enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer
On 2018?03?01? 18:35, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 17:23:37 +0800 > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 2018?03?01? 17:10, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:19:03 +0800 >>> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This series tries to re-enable XDP_REDIRECT
2018 Mar 01
2
[PATCH net-next 0/2] virtio-net: re enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer
On 2018?03?01? 18:35, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 17:23:37 +0800 > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 2018?03?01? 17:10, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:19:03 +0800 >>> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This series tries to re-enable XDP_REDIRECT
2020 May 06
6
[PATCH net-next 1/2] virtio-net: don't reserve space for vnet header for XDP
We tried to reserve space for vnet header before xdp.data_hard_start. But this is useless since the packet could be modified by XDP which may invalidate the information stored in the header and there's no way for XDP to know the existence of the vnet header currently. So let's just not reserve space for vnet header in this case. Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com>
2020 May 06
6
[PATCH net-next 1/2] virtio-net: don't reserve space for vnet header for XDP
We tried to reserve space for vnet header before xdp.data_hard_start. But this is useless since the packet could be modified by XDP which may invalidate the information stored in the header and there's no way for XDP to know the existence of the vnet header currently. So let's just not reserve space for vnet header in this case. Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com>
2004 Sep 28
2
Shaping not working
Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in
2017 Dec 22
1
[bpf-next V2 PATCH 11/14] virtio_net: setup xdp_rxq_info
The virtio_net driver doesn't dynamically change the RX-ring queue layout and backing pages, but instead reject XDP setup if all the conditions for XDP is not meet. Thus, the xdp_rxq_info also remains fairly static. This allow us to simply add the reg/unreg to net_device open/close functions. Driver hook points for xdp_rxq_info: * reg : virtnet_open * unreg: virtnet_close Cc:
2006 Sep 29
0
urgent probllem
Hi all, I am very new to traffic control. I read the lartc how to and I am curently using the script in ch15 (cookbook) with some restricion : I excluded the ingress section and i implemented the rest on both interfaces of my firewall.(eth0 the internet interface and eth1 the LAN interface).find below the script use on eth1 (ssh priority one and all other 2)
2020 May 06
4
performance bug in virtio net xdp
So for mergeable bufs, we use ewma machinery to guess the correct buffer size. If we don't guess correctly, XDP has to do aggressive copies. Problem is, xdp paths do not update the ewma at all, except sometimes with XDP_PASS. So whatever we happen to have before we attach XDP, will mostly stay around. The fix is probably to update ewma unconditionally. -- MST
2020 May 06
4
performance bug in virtio net xdp
So for mergeable bufs, we use ewma machinery to guess the correct buffer size. If we don't guess correctly, XDP has to do aggressive copies. Problem is, xdp paths do not update the ewma at all, except sometimes with XDP_PASS. So whatever we happen to have before we attach XDP, will mostly stay around. The fix is probably to update ewma unconditionally. -- MST