similar to: Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 7, Issue 6

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, but best for me would be if you could make an example from the script I have. I know I did something wrong into it, but I still can''t see the error. If you could fix the error from my script that would be much appreciated. Looking forward to hear from you, Daniel Phlander lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: Send LARTC mailing list

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, I tried to fix something on the script, I don''t know if I did it well. Can you take another look on it please and if is wrong to make the corrections directly on it so that I see where the mistake is... With this script I want to make limits for IP class 85.120.48.0/25 for international traffic in 256 KBps classes and for metropolitan

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

I''m working with LEAF boxes as gateway machines. I''m trying to implement Proxy-ARP to build a bandwidth manager for my network. I''ve gone as per the lartc howto to implement a transparent bridge in an existing network and plan to put in my tc script after this. I''m configuring the box as a standalone one before plugging it into the network. I''m getting

Hi chaps, host = laptop dom0 = debian testing domU = various problem = providing wireless to my domUs references = http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Virtualization-en-US/ch-virt-laptop-configurations.html That ref has been good so far in that a CentOS instance has got an IP with dummy0. host machine:- cat /etc/issue && cat /etc/network/interfaces Debian

>From netdev@oss.sgi.com: ----- Forwarded message from jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> ----- X-Original-To: sebek@localhost X-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6 From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru> Cc:

Dear All, I have a problem to start Shorewall on a Debian 1.3 Linux box. Here is some info: Output of ''/sbin/shorewall trace start 2> /tmp/trace'' is in the attachment. Shorewall version: 2.2.3 Output of ''ip addr show'': 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 2: bond0:

No. Network Manager is always disabled on our builds since at least Cent5 days. The network stack has always been able to be managed properly without relying on Network Manager. Is that now an absolute requirement? It never has been prior. On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:26 PM Strahil Nikolov via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Have you tried to use NetworkManager ? > After

Have you tried to use NetworkManager ? After all ,anything network related should be done by it. [root at system ~]# nmcli connection add con-name dummy0 ifname dummy0 type dummy ? Connection 'dummy0' (9fdd74fa-c143-4991-9bac-0e542704ac89) successfully added. [root at system ~]# reboot Shared connection to glustera closed. [root at system ~]# uptime 03:23:44 up 0 min, ?1 user, ?load

Hello, I am having big problems with Xen virtual network interfaces. First I tried typical bridge support, no luck. The packets sent from dom0 to domU seemed to disappear somewhere. Then, to debug the problem I have set up a simple point-to-point link and still have the same problem. I am using Xen 3.0.4-1 and Linux 2.6.16.x in both dom0 and domU. I have tried kernel 2.6.16.35 and 2.6.16.41. I

Requirement is a very strong word , but you should consider using it and here is a short demo why: - By default, RHEL uses NetworkManager to configure and manage network connections, and the /usr/sbin/ifup and /usr/sbin/ifdown scripts use NetworkManager to process ifcfg files in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ directory. [root at system ~]# ls -l /usr/sbin/ifup lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 21

Thanks a lot , Everythings is working now. Quoting Alex Martin <alex@rettc.com>: > > > At this point point ip addr show: > > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue > > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > > 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000

Hello everyone. I just installed Xen 3.0.3 in a debian etch box. Linux server1.example.com 2.6.18-6-xen-686 #1 This server1 has two real nic (eth0 with real MAC 00:13:72:57:7B:AE and eth1 with real MAC00:13:72:57:7B:AF). I made a network-bridge custom like this: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0")

Hi, this is my first message to the list and I want to thank the the autor for developing Shorewall. And now the problem. I''m using version 1.3.13 and I have eth0 (IP a.b.c.d/24) as a public interface. I have an alias on eth0:0 (address a.b.c.e/24) and my dns servce listens on this IP (in this moment the dns is stopped). This is my policy file: #SOURCE... fw all

Hello alltogether, I''m new to the list, so please excuse any violations of listiquette... I didn''t have to much to do with linux based firewalling and routing for quite a time and found that proxy-arp changed in between... As I struggled with it I found that the Advanced routing... howto wasn''t to helpfull. Especially the documentation seems to be rather vice versa to

Hello Will someonekindly update me on whether julians''s patch is now a standard feature on the linux kernel release? Is there a decision to provide the same feature but re-worked in some way (i.e out-of the-box dead gateway detection for example) in a future release. Or do I still need to patch the latest kernel release, and do all the "stuff" as explained in the

/-----------------------\ | | |eth0 |eth0 |-------| |-------| | |eth1 eth1 | | -------- A |____ _______| B |----- | | \ / | | --------| | | --------| | | | |

If you have a working proxyARP setup, will you please post it? I''ve tried to insert a Linux box between the DSL connection and the switch, but I''m getting nowhere. Everything works correctly when all the servers in this network use the switch to get to the DSL. Any box directly connected to the DSL also works correctly. http://www.sjdjweis.com/linux/proxyarp/ makes it sound

(Sorry, my previous post was sent in HTML format) I am having a hell of a time with shorewall... I have a Dlink DCM202 Cable modem with the Ethernet connected directly to eth0 on the linux box. Then I have a second nic on the linux box connected to a hub for the internal network. I am trying to allow traffic from the internet connect to my FTP and WEB servers on my Winbloze box on the lan.

On 12/15/18 9:54 AM, daggs wrote: > Greetings, > > I have two vms, one is a router and the other one is a client, for some reason, the client vm is unable get ip via dhcp from the router vm. > here are outputs: > vm1.xml: > <interface type='bridge'> > <mac address='52:54:00:54:78:be'/> > <source bridge='virbr0'/>