similar to: creating a cache in rails

Hi all - I am trying to get rails to use memcache for sessions and fragment caching. I''d also like to use the same connection for general caching of this and that. I''m following the instructions here: http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoChangeSessionStore and hitting a brick wall. I''m using the new memcache-client since from what I''ve read

In our app we''ve a number of singleton ruby classes that cache static data in hashes, things like string values, system config params, etc). In a webbrick environment this works ok, but we find in production we have a problem because we have 4 caches, one for each mongrel instance. This also isn''t a BIG problem, but our cache.reload() methods are kinda useless now, because we

Hi, I am from a Java background and pretty new to Ruby and Rails. What I am wondering is how I would shared state accross requests and users without involving IO, i.e. use memory. My current understanding is that for each request a new process ist spawn and therefore it gets its own memory. So no sharing can take place between requests? Do I understand this right? For those who know

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey, I''ve been using Mongrel for quite some time now but I ran into an issue that threw me back to lighttpd + fastcgi. The application in question was running fine in the production environment with SQLSessionStore and using a mongrel cluster behind a load balancer. However, by switching to a MemcacheSessionStore (using either

How can I safely mock a singleton without the mocked method living on outside the scope of the test method? I''ve run into this problem with mocking methods on globals (gasp!) in the past by doing something like def mock_my_global original = $my_global $my_global.expects(:foo).returns(''bar'') yield $my_global = original end Is there something similar I

I''m trying to add some per-object behaviors to objects descended from ActiveRecord, by using after_initialize() and instance_eval(), like this: def after_initialize self.instance_eval(File.read(''customers/default.rb'')) end (Ultimately the file path will be dynamic, this is just proof of concept.) default.rb just contains a few method definitions like this one: def

No, I'm reading the dlz_bind9.c code. I've found and fixed the problem. It turns out that using a reference counted singleton is a bad idea. The singleton is defunct after reload. If we simply create a new state object and destroy the old one as bind is trying to let us do, things work out fine. This works, at least, for bind9.9. I cant test with the older (9.8), so it is possible that

Hey all, I am looking through this example Rails app where a user session is stored in cookie so user signs up in one rails app and navigates to another while still being signed in as unique user. I come across this line of code where I don''t understand where some of these methods are coming from: @session = Session.create!(:user => @user) cookies[:session_token] = {:value

Hi, I have a controller where I access a singleton class that I use to connect to a DRbprocess DrbConnector.instance.some_method I notice that on every request, the constructor is called so it is making a new instance of this singleton. Is this normal? Thanks, Curtis

Im trying to deploy with capistrano from win32 to Linux but no success. I''ve been installed: cwRsync to ssh I ran rake remote:exec ACTION=setup --trace and get: Anyone knows how to get capistrano log ssh comunication? Any idea? Thanks rake aborted! End of file reached c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-ssh-1.0.8/lib/net/ssh/transport/version-negot iator.rb:51:in `readline''

Hi all, I know it may not have much sense thinking about a Singleton Pattern in an R application which doesn't use any OOP facilities, however I'm curious to know if anybody faced the same issue. I've been googling but using "singleton pattern" as a key word leads to typical OOP languages like Java or C++ among others. So my problem is that I'd like to ensure some very

I'm having a bit of trouble recoding factors in a fields. I have a field which has the factors Singleton, Twin and Triplet. I want to recode the field to have only the factors Singleton and Multiple. Any advice? Cheers, Neil

I guess the issue of singleton objects leaking is not something that he LLVM team is very concerned about, since there has been no replies to my first mail... But for me it is a big problem. I can't use LLVM in our project if it triggers our leak detection system, since it will hide other problems. Since actually deleting these objects is proving difficult (types can have circular

Hello Railists, I have a piece of Ruby on Rails code that has a complex SQL query (well, not that complex, but as far as I know beyond the ORM capabilities) and for my taste it has too many strings and harcoded values. I''d like to improve it as much as possible, so my question is open ended, what else can I do to improve it? Some particular issues I have - Is there a way to get a table

When I''m executing cucumber tests, I noticed that sometimes rails app (in test env.) getting several the same requests (GET or POST) usually around 3, and it doesn''t render anything with empty HTTP status code. Have anyone met something similar to that issue? here is some example of log file: Started POST "/account" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-11-30 22:34:17 +0200

I''m trying to run a single worker that could perform a periodic task for a given user. >From a controller, I imagine something like: def start_job MiddleMan.ask_work(:worker => :foo_worker, :worker_method => :perform_task, :data => { :user_id = current_user.id }) end def check_job @status = MiddleMan.ask_status(:worker => :foo_worker)[current_user.id] end

On 4 Oct 2007, at 00:22, Evan Cheng wrote: >> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86) >> LLCBETAOPTION := -regalloc=local -fast -tail-call-opt -tail-call-opt- >> align-stack > Please remove -regalloc=local -fast. We want to test this patch > separately. just did a test with LLCBETAOPTION := -tail-call-opt -tail-call-opt-align-stack this time only SPASS llc-beta fails (comparing with vanilla

Hi, say my application has a small 20 row information table in the database that stores names of airlines: "continental", "delta", united" , etc... These names will be used in various pages of the application for all the website users for different actions. They do not expect to change often. what I do now is - when a user logs in - these airline names are queried

Hi, In my user_controller.rb, I have the following method, which is supposed to send the user to their profile, dependng on what "role" they are (the roles correspond to the other controllers: venue, band, fan): def login if request.post? if session[:user_id] = User.authenticate(params[:user][:login], params[:user][:password]) flash[:message] =

Hi, When I added this association... class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :notify end ...and tried then to update column in User table it will call queries for notify table automatic? Output --------------------------------------------------------------- User Columns (0.041488) SHOW FIELDS FROM `users` User Load (0.001544) SELECT * FROM `users` WHERE (`users`.`nickname` =