similar to: Netcard functions with prio

Dear Friends I have 2 netcards (eth0 to Internet and eth1 to internal network) in CENTOS 4.2, bit when I boot system the up eth0 and et1i [OK]. When I run ifconfig the eth1 has not IP configure, then I run command ifdown eth1 and ifup eth1, after eth1 is work perfect. Below I show file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt # for

Hello, I''d like to build a 4 class prio system based on mark (until now no problem), but with a limited bandwidth. I have configured my eth* to be 10mbit full duplex, and I''d like to limit the bandwidth to 1mbit. I managed to do it with a policy filter matching all the traffic, but I can redirect it into only one class, so all my prio classes are useless. I also tried to limit

Hi, I''ve been using htb fine to separate outgoing SMTP traffic from HTTP traffic so sending big emails doesn''t affect browsing. As long as ceil == burst and the sum of all rates don''t exceed the root class'' rate all is fine but when I incorporate ceil I would expect (from lartc howto) that when other classes are idle the remaining bandwith would be assigned

Hello LARTC!!!! There is a question that kills me everytime I think about it. I just love HTB and for one year since I started to work wih it I had no complains until one day. One client needs to allocate the shared bandwith , based on priorities. The HTB as everybody knows have the CEIL parameter and also PRIO which are supposed to solve the problem. Now the problem: I configure everything, rate

I have a machine running 2.4.25 w/ wrr, ebtables-brnf, iptables CLASSIFY and esfq patches (not using esfq, though). I have wrr set up, and within each class I want to prioritize ssh, web, etc..., but right now I am testing with pings. I have the following in my POSTROUTING mangle table: CLASSIFY icmp -- anywhere anywhere CLASSIFY set 0:6 I find that if I attach a prio

Hello all. We have three tunnels over the internet between our "central" gateway and some branch office gateway. Each gateway has eth0 on its LAN an eth1 on the internet. We use DSL lines and eth1''s have the internet IP directly attached on it. Each gateway, also, acts as iptables NAT gateway. The outgoing bandwith is 300 kbit, and we tried this (i.e.) on each tunnel: tc

Hi, I wanted to implement some QOS on my Linux Box with HTB, but after some time spend on the configuration and tests, I still don''t manage to have some correct results. Here are the details : -ROOT 2000 kbits -HIGHPRIO SUBCLASS 50 kbits prio 0 -SUBCLASS1 750 kbits prio 1 -SERVICE1 250 kbits prio 1

hi I have try to "xm block-attach " to hotplug a disk into a running paraVM and I want to kown whether the netcard could be hotpluged into a running paraVM? if it could , how to do it? could you holp me Thanks in advance _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, We''ve done a lots of tests on htb class to study behaviuor of delay. We use this simple configuration: tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root htb tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 5000000 ceil 5000000 burst 30000 quantum 1600 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb prio 1 rate 1000000 ceil 1000000 quantum 1600 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip

Hi, this is a followup to "Problem with HTB and ceil", the problem with the ceiling has been resolved, thanks to the memebers on this m/g. Now I have the problem that packets get into the correct classe with the correct marks but the prios are not respected. I have 4 different classes: 1. voip class / prio 0 / mark 100 / voip traffic 2. ACK class / prio 1 / mark 200 / ACK packets to

I have clients, which connectin to Internet through vpn. I want to dynamically share bandwith between vpn connections, so if there few connections, then they get all bandwith, if more then they get their minimal guaranteed bandwith. my idea is: ip-up.local: tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2${1/ppp/} htb rate $[$RATEUP/$VPNS]kbit ceil ${RATEUP}kbps tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip

I just compile one kernel to the domU but cant see the PCI netcard, i hide the card from dom0 physdev_dom0_hide=''(00:11.0)'' and added to the domU config pci = [ ''0,11,0'' ] and dint work.. any howto to do that? - ariel ariel en BSDlatino . org ariel en ferreras . info http://www.BSDlatino.org http://ariel.BSDlatino.org

> does somebody have a working tc commandlist with bandwith limit for > internet>lan use? The following is a snippet that I got from my linux router vendor. I will be putting it in place this week. They ensure me that it will work. This takes an IP block that uses eth0 and limits the bw for that IP block to 3Mbit. I hope this is what you are after, as I am fairly new to this as well, I

Thanks for quick reply Andreas! > Every class is allowed to use bandwidth as long as it does not have to > borrow (the specified rate is guaranteed). Prio in HTB only affects > borrowing bandwidth from other classes... In the example below, the class > 1:5 should be allowed to borrow bandwidth before 1:14 does. Thats exactly what I want from HTB to do..to prio the borrowed bandwidth.

hello again, I got some just preliminary results .... hope someone can explain them to me... As I already told I have the following config : egress { class (30kbps) {sfq}; class (50kbps) {sfq}; class (80kbps) {sfq}; class (30kbps) {sfq}; class (50kbps) {sfq}; ...hundreds like this... class (10kbps,default) {sfq}; } What I got is traffic starvation very often for a period of ~30 sec.. as

Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which are working great) and we are running NAT. Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what

Hi, I''m fighting seriously with a most simple HTB setup. I''d like to share the incoming 64kbps into 5 and 59 for two different machines under NAT. HTB seems to hold the required limits when ceil is not set (no borrowing), but when borrowing enabled it seems to share equally rather then keeping the specified ratio. My setup is below. A typical output of "tc -s -d qdisc

Hi,All I am using iproute2 to manage bandwith for ADSL router.High,medium,low priority are needed for different protocol port on the ADSL's upstream side,as following: LAN --- |ADSL Router|------WAN When there aren't traffic on the specific priority, its bandwidth should be borrowed by other priorities.But it doesn't work.Here is my script: /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev nas0 root

Hi all, i''ve coded htb-gen, a GPL htb frontend and much more... htb-gen is meant to be an easy, scalable, yet powerfull, bandwidth management tool. You can set up/down portions of bandwith for each host or network, that goes trough your router/firewall. Prioritary traffic(web, mail, gaming, ftp, voip, streaming) is preferred over Junk traffic(kazaa, emule, etc). Also dynamic bandwith

Hi, I have been playing this weekend with bonding on PCI netcards and found that all of netcards I have, but old 3com, do not support MII. So bonding is not going to happen with them. Do you have some pci netcards supporting MII successfully running on bonging? Thanks, David Hrb??