similar to: sercice-based and ip-based shaping

Thanks, The only issue here is that for each service I need to create 200 child classes if I have 200 clients... Let me explain the problem better I have the following connection from my ISP: (1024/1024) (rate/ceil) 1) First, I want to divide the 1024 into smaller pieces based on priority: 256/256 - P2P (I want to limit the P2P traffic as much as possible) 256/1024 - HTTP 256/1024 - FTP

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Vinod Chandran <vinod_chandran@multitech.co.in> Subject: Re: [LARTC] sercice-based and ip-based shaping Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:36:00 +0530 Size: 3441 Url: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/attachments/20050802/44a5f54e/LARTCsercice-basedandip-basedshaping.eml

Hello again, Is it possible to split a bandwidth equally among clients regardless of its current link speed? I have a link that can get bursty at times. At any given time the N active sessions (the ones with non-empty queues) need to be serviced simultaneously, each at a rate of 1/N''th of the link speed. My case is an internet connection that oscillates between 96 kbps and 256 kbps. I

> > > Another nice feature to add would be a "bandwidth" limit (so just a new > > > <limit> type entry). If you are running icecast2 on linux you can handle bandwidth limitations using QoS more specificly iproute2. That way icecast2 doesnt have to take up extra resources to handle bandwidth limitations. resources here cbq bash script

First off, please excuse the cross post between lartc and netfiler, the line between the two is very blurred here (at least for me)... A thought just crossed my mind now while working on a new iptables/tc collaboration for a project. I use iptables to basically seal off a linux gateway, we''re very restrictive on what users can do on the connection. For now I''m using destination

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Geoff Shang wrote: > Mihai RUSU wrote: > > > Another nice feature to add would be a "bandwidth" limit (so just a new > > <limit> type entry). > > Problem with this is, what do you do once the limit has been reached? Who > do you kick? Or do you just not allow anymore listeners? I

Hello, Is there a way to route p2p traffic on a separate ISP connection, just as you would choose a separate connection for http traffic? I tried all sorts of setups based on: http://www.braindump.dk/en/wiki/?wikipage=PolicyRouting but with no luck. Please help :) (ipp2p is up and running) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hello, some days ago, I was asking for help here about not able to do anything when I had bittorrent running, I will post the problem here: I''m using ipp2p to mark p2p packets, and then send them with -j CLASSIFY to the correct HTB class, I see traffic in the class when I start azurerus, and traffic does get shaped, but then I''m still not able to surf the web nor chat nor

Hi all, I have read the larc howto and I need to apply a traffic shaper with this configuration: router / two interface etho and eth1 lan lan is on eth1 and on eth0 I''ve the dsl connection (1.2 Mbit / 256 kbit) I need to limit the bandwith towards lan and I''ve thought at HTB and tcng. I write the script belove. I want limit the p2p and ftp (ssh and irc) connection at 15

Hello again, I may have a common problem to solve but it seems it is harder than I thought... I have 2 internet providers (each one having a different gateway). Behind the router there are around 100 clients that are SNAT-ed. I want some clients to be SNAT-ed to the first provider, while the others to the second one. The following lines should work: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s

Hello, I am making a HTB script for a few people and I wanted to ask a question. Now I have a nice script with this hierarchy of classes. root(128/128) +---WWW(32/128) +---Default(32/128) +---P2P(1/64) #P2P Programs like DC and Kazza +---.... How should I implement limiting the speed of some users (by IP addresses)? I had an idea, but it looks too compicated. What do you think?

Hi, Our webradio (Let's Go Zik - http://www.letsgozik.com) works with donation and partenship. I think it's the only way to keep a webradio alive for the moment... We are making our radio in a associative way... It's quite hard to "find" listeners. Currently we are nearly broadcasting for 60 simultaneous listeners (and approx. 5000 differents listeners per months)...

Ok, earlier I post a message explaining my problem with HTB and layer7 (or ipp2p), about not being able to shape the traffic. Well, actually this is what''s happening, I''m marking the packets (right now, I''m using ipp2p as Klaus adviced me to) with iptables, and my queue rules are made using tcng, I''m using the HTB qdisc, and traffic is going to the HTB class

hi all! i have a dsl connection with 1280 kbps for downstream and 256 kbps for upstream, and i want to manage the bandwidth to give high priority to voip traffic and low priority to p2p traffic. i found the script jdg-qos. i readed on this forum (i have a dsl-g604t router with MCMCC firmware) http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16250220 that the two parameters of the jdg-qos script (DWIFLIMIT

Hello, it''s me again, finally p2p traffic is getting shaped, but now I still have one problem: download seems to be affected when shaping the traffic, ack packets are in the interactive queue too, as someone adviced me, what fixed the problem was to change the rates, to match (the sum of all subclasses) the root class rate, and to give the p2p class a very low rate (1k actually) and

Hi all! I''m trying to shape traffic in a dorm''s network (4 mbit symmetrical internet link, about 200 computers, heavy p2p usage). The router is a p4xeon running linux 2.6.9 with the qnet patches (http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/). When I activate ip_forward I get >20% packet loss and a lot of duplicates. Any ideas? I attach my shaping script. Thank you very much in advance,

hi list, i''m about to setup traffic shaping on a server and got some small questions about the setup. i read alot of docs/howto''s but there are still some questions i''d like to ask. setup on the box is: - external if is ppp0 (dsl) - internal if in eth0 (with ~15 nat''ed boxes) - openvpn at tun1 since all ppl on the lan feel like they have to use p2p i decided

Hey guys, I am planning to buy some components for a Linux router that will handle the Internet access of 200 computers (includes tc shaping) and some inter sub-network routing (at least 100MBps per eth - and there are 3 eth cards). I was thinking of a: Pentium 4 - 3GHz 256 or 512MB RAM Network Cards. Now - I wonder what is more important: the processor speed or the amount of RAM. And can you

A friend and I were recently talking about the possible downfall of Internet radio, and as everyone seems to these days, decided that a nice solution would be to set up a P2P broadcasting solution. However, streaming has a completely different set of requirements than file sharing, with bandwidth and QOS become much larger issues. As such, we started to realize that a new audio compression scheme

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi I have started to add bandwidth <limit> option to icecast. My ideea is to compute the current bandwidth by estimation on each sock_write*() call. Something like this: 1. initially we set kbps = 0, kbps_time = now and kbps_bytes = 0 2. after some time, a sock_write*() function is called which in turn calls sock_kbps_update(nobytes);