similar to: Working With Rails - Phase 2 preview - next 24 hours only

Calling All Mongrel Minions! I wanna have some fun and would like this as a Christmas present. The site http://www.workingwithrails.com/ has this lame popularity system that''s kind of irking some of the main Ruby contributors. I think it''s kind of funny, but would like to demonstrate what an army of motivated people can do to these kinds of popularity contests. So, as a

Will shortly be deploying first iteration of app to some beta testers (i.e. friends), and want them to be able see it both from logged-in view and guest (i.e. not logged-in) view. The two are a fair bit different. It''s a closed beta, so (hopefully) no pages (other than a blank login page) will be visible. The question is, what''s the best way for them to be able to see (and

Thanks for the response. I was more specifically looking through the source code for a place where Reaching Definitions was implemented to derive those uses and/or to generate the SSA. To provide some context, as a student I have a project to implement a path infeasibility algorithm to "Sharpen" the results of the Reaching Definitions results in LLVM. Being new to LLVM I wasn't

The immediate uses info provides reaching definitions already, at least while the code is in SSA form. So uh, what more are you looking for? 2009/3/17 Shone Sadler <shone.sadler at gmail.com>: > Hello, > > > I am a newbie to LLVM as well as compilers and I am hoping for some > direction in finding an instance of where a Reaching Definition Analysis is > being implemented

I just committed what will eventually become the next version of libao. I've made some major changes: renamed stuff, redesigned the API, actually documented things. It *will* break any current libao applications (like ogg123). It is on its own branch, so it shouldn't affect the mainline libao code for a while. But beware: I want to land this branch before Vorbis 1.0 goes out. Please

Hi Tom, When running the test script, I got an error message: $ ./test-release.sh -no-64bit -release 3.4.2 -rc 1 -triple armv7a-linux-gnueabihf -j2 # Validating llvm SVN URL llvm 3.4.2 release candidate rc1 doesn't exist! Do I need to get another test-release.sh script? This is the one from release_34 branch we used to release 3.4.1. cheers, --renato On 16 May 2014 22:55, Tom Stellard

2009/3/17 Shone Sadler <shone.sadler at gmail.com>: > I was more specifically looking through the source > code for a place where Reaching Definitions was implemented to derive those > uses and/or to generate the SSA. mem2reg (llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp) transforms to SSA form, but that's the conventional SSA construction algorithm, which doesn't

Since 2008, Microsoft (formerly Revolution Analytics) staff and guests have written about R at the Revolutions blog (http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com) and every month I post a summary of articles from the previous month of particular interest to readers of r-help. In case you missed them, here are some articles related to R from the month of November: R 3.4.3 "Kite Eating Tree" has

I write about R every weekday at the Revolutions blog: http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com and every month I post a summary of articles from the previous month of particular interest to readers of r-help. In case you missed them, here are some articles related to R from the month of February: February 29 marked the 12th anniversary of the release of R 1.0.0, and the release of R 2.14.2:

No regressions this time. Fedora and OpenSUSE binaries uploaded. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Dropping llvmdev and cc'ing testers directly, so this email > won't be held in moderation for having too many recipients. > > I like having tester discussions on list, so it would probably > be best to reply to the original

Alright Mongrel people, thanks for contributing to the mayhem around popularity by making me the official King of the Internet. In case you all missed it, here''s my blog post on my first act as King: http://www.zedshaw.com/blog/2006-12-26.html Stay tuned for pedro. I want to make this reign very democratic and chaotic. (I wonder if the Nitro folks will help with pedro?) The whole

64bit Fedora Failing Tests (8): LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer :: TestCases/cleanup_in_tsd_destructor.cc LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer :: TestCases/disabler.cc LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer :: TestCases/disabler_in_tsd_destructor.cc LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer :: TestCases/ignore_object.cc LeakSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/cleanup_in_tsd_destructor.cc

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:20 AM, <sebastian.dressler at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I uploaded > > c55199c92877ed068b2f7d1ece6b0bb4f121a63a clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc1-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz > > to SFTP. Thanks! > Testing was OK except for differences between phase 2 and 3 which I consider being not harmful (or even: usual). No problem with the build script

I'm looking for a hosting company who's willing to host a asterisk@home instance for under $100 a month. Experienced and professional asterisk hosting only. Thanks, Chuck

Hello, I am a newbie to LLVM as well as compilers and I am hoping for some direction in finding an instance of where a Reaching Definition Analysis is being implemented within LLVM. I have referenced the sources files, initially hoping to find an explicit ReachingDefinitionAnalysis.cpp file ;-) but with no such luck. Other than that I have found the files SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp and the

On Friday, July 31, 2015 07:50 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > Dear testers, > > 3.7.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test, build binaries, upload to the > sftp, and report results to this thread. LNT is looking good on Ubuntu 14.04 x64, uploaded: clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz The errors reported during build are: Failing Tests (17):

You're not the only one Hans, my VMs have started crashing my host OS :) Fedora and OpenSUSE look good, binaries uploaded. On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We

Hi all, I get two different results when using sum() and the switch na.rm. The result is correct when na.rm=FALSE. Linux Redhat 7.3, R version 1.6.1. I've had no luck searching the mail archives, so I was hoping somebody could explain/check this one for me. I will need to apply the function to missing data, simple as it is. Code: x<-matrix(runif(20,0,5)%/%1,4,5) # random matrix

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 17 Jul 2015, at 00:31, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> >> Dear testers, >> >> 3.7.0-rc1 was just tagged; please start your testing engines :-) >> >> Upload binaries to the sftp and report your results to this thread. >> >> I'm sorry

Hi Renato, On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > We're missing libunwind from the list of projects in 3.7. > > The current way libcxxabi builds depends on libunwin (looking for > libunwind.h), so we need to tag libunwind, check it out in the script > and build it together. > > For now, I'll disable libcxx from my