similar to: Working With Rails - Phase 2 preview - next 24 hours only

Calling All Mongrel Minions! I wanna have some fun and would like this as a Christmas present. The site http://www.workingwithrails.com/ has this lame popularity system that''s kind of irking some of the main Ruby contributors. I think it''s kind of funny, but would like to demonstrate what an army of motivated people can do to these kinds of popularity contests. So, as a

Thanks for the response. I was more specifically looking through the source code for a place where Reaching Definitions was implemented to derive those uses and/or to generate the SSA. To provide some context, as a student I have a project to implement a path infeasibility algorithm to "Sharpen" the results of the Reaching Definitions results in LLVM. Being new to LLVM I wasn't

The immediate uses info provides reaching definitions already, at least while the code is in SSA form. So uh, what more are you looking for? 2009/3/17 Shone Sadler <shone.sadler at gmail.com>: > Hello, > > > I am a newbie to LLVM as well as compilers and I am hoping for some > direction in finding an instance of where a Reaching Definition Analysis is > being implemented

Alright Mongrel people, thanks for contributing to the mayhem around popularity by making me the official King of the Internet. In case you all missed it, here''s my blog post on my first act as King: http://www.zedshaw.com/blog/2006-12-26.html Stay tuned for pedro. I want to make this reign very democratic and chaotic. (I wonder if the Nitro folks will help with pedro?) The whole

I just committed what will eventually become the next version of libao. I've made some major changes: renamed stuff, redesigned the API, actually documented things. It *will* break any current libao applications (like ogg123). It is on its own branch, so it shouldn't affect the mainline libao code for a while. But beware: I want to land this branch before Vorbis 1.0 goes out. Please

Will shortly be deploying first iteration of app to some beta testers (i.e. friends), and want them to be able see it both from logged-in view and guest (i.e. not logged-in) view. The two are a fair bit different. It''s a closed beta, so (hopefully) no pages (other than a blank login page) will be visible. The question is, what''s the best way for them to be able to see (and

2009/3/17 Shone Sadler <shone.sadler at gmail.com>: > I was more specifically looking through the source > code for a place where Reaching Definitions was implemented to derive those > uses and/or to generate the SSA. mem2reg (llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp) transforms to SSA form, but that's the conventional SSA construction algorithm, which doesn't

Since 2008, Microsoft (formerly Revolution Analytics) staff and guests have written about R at the Revolutions blog (http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com) and every month I post a summary of articles from the previous month of particular interest to readers of r-help. In case you missed them, here are some articles related to R from the month of November: R 3.4.3 "Kite Eating Tree" has

I write about R every weekday at the Revolutions blog: http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com and every month I post a summary of articles from the previous month of particular interest to readers of r-help. In case you missed them, here are some articles related to R from the month of February: February 29 marked the 12th anniversary of the release of R 1.0.0, and the release of R 2.14.2:

I'm looking for a hosting company who's willing to host a asterisk@home instance for under $100 a month. Experienced and professional asterisk hosting only. Thanks, Chuck

Hello, I am a newbie to LLVM as well as compilers and I am hoping for some direction in finding an instance of where a Reaching Definition Analysis is being implemented within LLVM. I have referenced the sources files, initially hoping to find an explicit ReachingDefinitionAnalysis.cpp file ;-) but with no such luck. Other than that I have found the files SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp and the

Hi Tom, When running the test script, I got an error message: $ ./test-release.sh -no-64bit -release 3.4.2 -rc 1 -triple armv7a-linux-gnueabihf -j2 # Validating llvm SVN URL llvm 3.4.2 release candidate rc1 doesn't exist! Do I need to get another test-release.sh script? This is the one from release_34 branch we used to release 3.4.1. cheers, --renato On 16 May 2014 22:55, Tom Stellard

Hi all, I get two different results when using sum() and the switch na.rm. The result is correct when na.rm=FALSE. Linux Redhat 7.3, R version 1.6.1. I've had no luck searching the mail archives, so I was hoping somebody could explain/check this one for me. I will need to apply the function to missing data, simple as it is. Code: x<-matrix(runif(20,0,5)%/%1,4,5) # random matrix

No regressions this time. Fedora and OpenSUSE binaries uploaded. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Dropping llvmdev and cc'ing testers directly, so this email > won't be held in moderation for having too many recipients. > > I like having tester discussions on list, so it would probably > be best to reply to the original

The cat is out of the bag, so here''s the full disclosure edition of the current security vulnerability. With Rails 1.1.0 through 1.1.5 (minus the short-lived 1.1.3), you can trigger the evaluation of Ruby code through the URL because of a bug in the routing code of Rails. This means that you can essentially take down a Rails process by starting something like /script/profiler, as the code

Hi, Some months ago, a person from Packt Publishing posted a message in this list looking for potential Authors/Reviewers for new Ruby on Rails books. Now I''m proud to announce my book [1] "Aptana RadRails: An IDE for Rails Development". If you are using [2] Aptana RadRails, or if you are looking for an IDE and you still haven''t decided which one to use, you might

HI friends, After updating ruby 1.8 to ruby1.9.1.......& on firing script/server to start a server, I am getting the following errror..... /home/HUNT/WEBlog/config/boot.rb:86:in `load_rubygems'': undefined method `>='' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from /home/HUNT/WEBlog/config/boot.rb:52:in `load_initializer'' from /home/HUNT/WEBlog/config/boot.rb:38:in

http://weblog.techno-weenie.net/articles/acts_as_attachment is an excellent introduction, but I am a newbie and need the next step outlined for me: How would I implement a controller/view (form) for the model that the attachments model belongs to? (The content items that have pictures attached) Or should I just make the content item model acts_as_attachment instead ? Does anyone know of a

The cat is out of the bag, so here''s the full disclosure edition of the current security vulnerability. With Rails 1.1.0 through 1.1.5 (minus the short-lived 1.1.3), you can trigger the evaluation of Ruby code through the URL because of a bug in the routing code of Rails. This means that you can essentially take down a Rails process by starting something like /script/profiler, as the code

As in previous years, I'm making an unofficial, unsupported, unsigned yum repository containing a preview of the libguestfs and virt-v2v RHEL 7.5 packages: https://people.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.5-preview/ PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT RED HAT SUPPORT ABOUT THESE PACKAGES. If you find any problems, contact the upstream mailing list directly by emailing <libguestfs at