Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Fatal: Can't finish POP3 UIDL command"
2017 Nov 03
0
migrating from maildir to mdbox, preserving pop3 UIDL
Hi,
I'm trying to migrate from maildir to mdbox while preserving the pop3 UIDL (and the imap UID).
The problem is, for maildir we use (for compatiblity with qpopper):
pop3_uidl_format = %f
Problem is, as soon as I convert that to mdbox, then whenever a client issues the UIDL command via a POP connection, the connection is closed and this error is displayed in the log:
Error: UIDL: File
2004 Feb 14
1
[PATCH] POP3: Fix RFC1939 non-compliance in STAT, LIST and UIDL commands
Hi all,
attached is a patch against 0.99.10.4 that fixes the STAT, LIST and
UIDL POP3 command output in the case that they're issued after one or
more messages have been deleted.
Examples of incorrect behavior (bad spots marked with '***')
C: STAT
S: +OK 2 806
C: LIST
S: +OK 2 messages:
S: 1 403
S: 2 403
S: .
C: UIDL
S: +OK
S: 1 1076749908.12
2006 Feb 12
1
Problems with POP3 UIDL when migrating from MBOX to Maildir
Hello,
I am in the process of migrating a hosting setup from UW-IMAP to
Dovecot. The protocols available to mail clients are IMAP and POP3
both before and after migration. I also wanted to change the mail
storage format from MBOX to Maildir. However, at this point I hit a
major snag with Dovecot and POP3 UIDL (unique identification listing
for POP3 mailboxes).
Several of the customers connecting
2009 Oct 05
1
dovecot 1.0.15 upgrading to dovecot 1.1.x or 1.2.x, and POP3 UIDL issue
Hi,
We're upgrading a cluster of servers from v1.0.15 to
v1.1.x or v1.2.x. It appears that the UIDL generation mechanism
has changed, and thus we'll be getting POP3 dups with users
that leave mail on server (which is a nasty practice, I know).
From checking the sources, and performing a number of controlled
tests in various scenarios, here is the outcome:
upgrade from 1.0.15 to
2006 Mar 09
1
POP3 extension to accept UIDL ranges?
Greetings,
is anybody aware of an extension to POP3 that supports UIDL ranges?
It would be very useful for keep-messages-on-server setups (yes, I know,
IMAP4 domain) to be able to do UIDL 21-42 to obtain just these 22 UIDs
(this would always have to be a multi-line reply, just like UIDL without
argument).
If such a thing does not exist yet, perhaps a keyword such as
"[X]UIDLRANGES" in
2004 Sep 02
1
Dovecots pop3-UIDL command impl. not RFC compliant ?
Hi !
POP3-RFC (1939) speaks about UIDL command:
The unique-id of a message is an arbitrary server-determined
string, consisting of one to 70 characters in the range 0x21
to 0x7E, which uniquely identifies a message within a maildrop and which
persists across sessions.
When I issue an UIDL command (dovecot 0.99.10.9)
I get replies like
1 1093990148.1
2 1093990148.2
3 1093990148.3
...
.
You see
2007 Oct 11
1
UIDL format for old UW pop3
Hi,
we're trying to migrate from UW imap 2001a-10, which doesn't seem to use the
UIDL format documented in the wiki. It seems to use a 16 character long MD5
hash of something. I've tried configuring Dovecot to do the same but the
value comes out differently.
The main thing that I can see is getting in the way is that the UIDL format
is not documented sufficiently. There is no
2005 Nov 10
0
dovecot-example.conf error with POP3 UIDL format?
I just installed dovecot 1.0alpha4 on a very busy RHEL4 server with
about 1300 users. So far so good, except for the dreaded duplicate
emails in outlook for users who use POP3 and have "leave message on
server" selected. After searching the archives I found that this is
usually related to the UIDL format. The example in the .conf file is this:
/ # If you want UIDL compatibility
2019 Mar 28
2
Mitigation / disable FTS and pop3-uidl plugin was Re: CVE-2019-7524: Buffer overflow when reading extension header from dovecot index files
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 28 March 2019 16:37 Kevin A. McGrail via dovecot <
<a href="mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org">dovecot@dovecot.org</a>> wrote:
</div>
2007 Feb 06
2
POP3 UIDL
I have installed rc22 and tried it with my mbox-based mail - fine.
Then I converted that mbox to Maildir to see if new feature (saving
state without QUIT) works -
first run - I get time out. Second run - I get rest of the Maildir
scanned and get into mailbox. Fine.
but....
# telnet enders2 110
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
2006 Mar 15
0
migrating POP3 from UW IMAP: X-UIDL and X-UID
With a INBOX mbox created by UW IMAP
the messages in INBOX mbox contains the X-UIDL field
When I use Dovecot POP3 with
pop3_uidl_format = %08Xv%08Xu
on the first run, X-UID is inserted, but all messages are downloaded again.
What am I missing, I don't want the clients to download the
read messages again.
Thanks
Bertrand Leboeuf
leboeuf at emt.inrs.ca
2007 Apr 26
1
sendmail + dovecot + vpopmail + virtual users, problem with pop3 uidl
Hi,
I just migrated a server running qmail+vpopmail+maildir to
sendmail+dovecot+maildir+vpopmail
The migrating is working great thanks to the help from the list and the
wiki.
I'm now running the infamous problem about duplicating emails, because
of pop3 UIDL mismatch.
My question is: anyone knows that the pop3_uidl_format string for
a vpopmail server?
I'm using vpopmail auth and
2019 Mar 28
0
Mitigation / disable FTS and pop3-uidl plugin was Re: CVE-2019-7524: Buffer overflow when reading extension header from dovecot index files
On 3/28/2019 7:42 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> olution:
> Operators should update to the latest Patch Release. The only workaround
> is to disable FTS and pop3-uidl plugin.
Hi Aki, thanks for the CVE.? For quick mitigation, can you confirm how
to disable these plugins and what they provide?? We'd like to assess if
we are using them while we rollout the fix.
Regards,
KAM
2019 Mar 28
0
Mitigation / disable FTS and pop3-uidl plugin was Re: CVE-2019-7524: Buffer overflow when reading extension header from dovecot index files
On 3/28/2019 10:40 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> check for fts in mail_plugins. pop3-uidl is used by pop3_migration
> plugin.
Sorry if I'm dense but can you be more specific?? Are you talking about
checking conf files or binary files??
For example, does the existence of
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib20_fts_plugin.so imply an exploitable situation??
Are their settings in a conf file that
2011 Jan 05
2
courier-dovecot-migrate.pl maintaining order of pop3 uidl's
Hi there,
I've just been experimenting with the latest courier-dovecot-migrate.pl
script and I notice that it favours keeping pop3 UIDL ordering rather
than IMAP UID preservation. There is this comment (line 312):
# POP3 clients may want to get POP3 UIDLs in the same order always.
# Preserve the order even if it causes IMAP UIDs to change.
Does anyone have details as to which
2012 Feb 09
1
POP3 UIDLs with virtual INBOX and migration from maildir->mdbox
Hi,
Considering the scenario, where you have some old account with a
different POP3 UIDL format and you migrate them to dovecot.
So these old UIDLs would be saved to dovecot-uidlist.
At some later time you want to introduce a virtual POP3 INBOX like
described on:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Virtual
So you decide to make the new UIDL format "%f" - to make them unique
across
2008 Oct 23
2
Dovecot returns the same UIDL for another message
Hello,
I have a serious problem with dovecot and mbox format.
dovecot returns the same UIDL for new messages and as result some MUAs don't
retrieve new mail.
UIDs returned by UIDL command look like 000000*1c*49006cec
And there is a moment when dovecot stops incrementing marked digits.
In other words when new message arrive to mbox, UIDL command returns used UID.
I'll show with example:
2013 Oct 25
1
UIDL conversion courier -> dovecot
I've got a weird split setup where POP3 is currently handled by Courier
(courier-imap-3.0.2 distribution), and IMAP is currently handled by the
RHEL 5 version of Dovecot (1.0.7)
I'm trying to figure out a way to convert the POP3 UIDLs (in cases where
the courierpop3dsizelist is newer than dovecot-uidlist, at least) to
something that Dovecot will read, or to configure Dovecot's pop3 to
2006 Oct 13
1
dovecot tpop3d UIDL mbox
Hello All!
I am new to this list so I hope I'm not in the wrong list with my question.
First, I have to say that dovecot is (in my opinion) one of the best POP3/IMAP
servers arround. I especialy like its' simplicity (configuration) and
powerfullness (speed, auth mechs).
In my production environment I would like to cange from tpop3d to dovecot, but I
have only one little problem :).
2004 Sep 02
2
Workaround for outlook UIDL handling bug ??
Scenario: Using Dovecot 0.99.10.9 as pop3 server.
With delete on retrival off.
clients: outlook*
Problem: Everytihng work perfectly, except that outlooks keeps
re-downloading SOME mail over and over. Though it already got them.
No obvious pattern which, but only a small percentage.
First of I looked at dovecots UIDLs.
Initialy I thought it's broken (see my previous thread)
Sorry for even