similar to: TOS in IP Header set to Minimize-Dealay - no difference

Hi, My home setup is as following: - 1024/128 kbit ADSL - FC3 I set up HTB to prioritize traffic. I am not very pleased with the obtained results. The scope of my setup is to have some ssh sessions with remote servers while browsing websites and running aMule Nothing complicated (I think... ;). The very high priority traffic (ssh), gets stuck when I start aMule and make an FTP download.

Hi, I am new to HTB and in the learning process I want to simulate a slower link on my server to see how qdisc works. I have a 100Mbit connection. I want to simulate a 100K connection and to divide traffic between FTP and SMB. (like in HTB user guide). The problem is that it doesn’t work. I can transfer files with FTP of SAMBA at the wire speed. (Just like when there was no HTB and qdisc).

Hi, I''ve tried to compile tcng on my 2.6.12 kernel and the ./configure returned that only 2.4 and 2.5 are supported. So, doesn''t tcng compile also on 2.6 kernel? -- ddaas

Hi, I have a CentOS 5.2 desktop with the RPMForge repo enabled. I just ran 'yum update', and there seems to be some trouble with the wxGTK apps. A simple 'yum update' gives this error message: --8<-------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0 is needed by package

Hi, I have met the problem: when I use the shaping discipline tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:2 tbf latency 50ms burst 1450 rate 50kbit one of my application (namely, "aMule") starts leaving sockets in "CLOSING" state. These sockets accumulate and do not disappear. Eventually I have so many of these dead sockets that the kernel warns "Out of socket memory" in

I execute emule 0.47c (because Amule and mldonkey doesn't have protocol ofuscation support) but I have some problems: 1.- I import the incoming + temp directories from amule, 250 downloads inside => error too many open files. To solve this, I try to import 20 files, next 20 files more, next 20 files more, in batch process. 2.- But when I use emule, the same error appears in some files in

I am still fighting with this issue. I did the following: I connected to the NAS with a read-only account called kodi. I traversed various folders and I finally opened an image. Everything went fine. Looking at the logs, the get_entry mask file only shows the final folder: smbd_dirptr_get_entry mask=[Anhelina Viber] found Users/luca/Pictures/Canon/Alessandro/Amici/Anhelina Viber fname=Anhelina

Hi all, I'm trying to use centos5 as desktop/development machine, but i having a lot of problems to compile Amule and d4X, tools that I use a lot. Somebody have some experience to do this work?? sombody have an .spec file?? thanks a lot ! JC J?nior Ps. yes I have all lib neccessari to build this tools.

Hi peploe, i am new in the list, i need know, how blocked the Amule/emule in shorewall? My dist. debian version: 3.2.6-shorewall -- .~. / v \ Seja Livre, use GNU/Linux! /( )\ ^^-^^ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.

I could find the amule package in CertOS7, is anyone know this? Thanks. Xiaoqi

Hello everyone, I have my centos server running just fine with everything I need... except I can't setup no p2p program (amule, bittorrent, etc). Anyone some hint on which program to use and how to make it run? Thanx Samuel --- andinasoft SA - Software y Consulting --- Mariano Aguilera 216 y Almagro - Quito, Ecuador Tel. +593 2 223 5682 ----- Cel. +593 9 946 4046 ---------

Hi all, I have a strange problem in trying to install a transparent proxy (in my internal net not on the shorewall server) according to the instructions as outlined in http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#Local My Network looks the following: Internal Net: 10.0.0.0/24 Squid Server listening on port 3128 (ip 10.0.0.152, DNS name server01) | |

Hi! I don;t know what i am doing wrong because i have still Low ID on aMule. I have action.AllowaMule and accept tcp 4662:4771 and udp 4672. Thanks, Mitja

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > severity 564845 important Bug #564845 [acl2] acl2: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 564850 important Bug #564850 [agave] agave: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 564853 important Bug #564853 [amule] amule: ftbfs with gcc-4.5

Dear All I have added the following line to /etc/shorewall/rules: ACCEPT net fw tcp 4662 However, the program aMule continues to give me the following error: NG : Your 4662 port is not reachable. Any further ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul

Hello there! I'm working on some modifications on Asterisk to adapt it to our needs considering some particular demandings of the infraestructure we want to provide. Two of these modifications are: 1- A proprietary configuration driver that will communicate with a server that will be the source of information for the entire infraestructure; and, 2- A call control application that will be

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tag 564974 + sid wheezy Bug #564974 [cyphesis-cpp] cyphesis-cpp: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 Added tag(s) wheezy. > tag 565026 + sid wheezy Bug #565026 [libfreebob] libfreebob: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 Added tag(s) wheezy. > tag 565051 + sid wheezy Bug #565051 [synopsis] synopsis: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 Added tag(s) wheezy. > tag 565068 + sid wheezy

We''ve just upgraded to a new firewall machine, and a new version of Shorewall. We''re now on 2.04; previous version was 1.3.9b (!). So I''m pretty sure whatever problems we''re having are related to the big version jump. We''re using config files that exactly match our old (working) configuration (IOW, these are things which _were_ working on the old

Hi, I have a cable modem with a bandwidth capped upload rate. I''d like to prioritize packets going outbound according to the TOS header of the IP field. I''ve read through the LARTC Howto several times, and I think I have a good feel for the information it it. It also seems that what I''m trying to do is pretty straight-forward and common. Unfortunately, the HOWTO

hi all ! we've got IAX2 protocol working between several Asterisk servers. Now we are concerned with doing bandwidth management to maintain an acceptable voice quality. We thought of prioritizing the udp traffic. ( Giving a high priority to those IAX2 udp ports.) I know that IAX2 uses udp/4569. Is there any other traffic/ports that we need to consider for bandwidth shaping w.r.t IAX2.