similar to: HTB and prio

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

Hello! I have an internet connection of 64kbps garanteed in a channel of 256kbps. On this connection the metropolitan speed is 10Mbps and in the provider''s network the speed is 100Mbps. I have a few clients behind my linux box and i want to set up some limitations because some of them are using it irrational. I am marking the packets with 0 for internet; 1 for metropolitan 2 for

Hi all. I have a bridge running Linux 2.4.24 that I use as a bandwidth manager on a broadband wireless network. I''m using HTB and SFQ to prioritize that share bandwidth on a per-cell basis. My IP tables rules divide the traffic based on IPand traffic type (using layer-7 filter and ipp2p). My goal is to make sure that p2p traffic on the network doesn''t sink all of the

Hi Stef, Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t mind Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please. What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from

hi everybody. im trying to set up an QoS config, using layer7 (http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/) for protocol detection. im suposing 3 clients with this configuration: 3 clients: 1.2.3.1 , 1.2.3.2 , 1.2.3.3 1.2.3.1 has 256kbit bandwidth "guaranteed" clients 1.2.3.2 and 1.2.3.3 has 256kbit bandwith so im marking every packet using layer7 iptables module, classifying them in three

dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat

A note to confirm that "-m physdev --physdev-is-bridged" in the iptables command does enable iptables to work in a bridged environment. I was fighting the same problem and this indeed solved it. Below is my test script running on a two NIC Debian 3.1 266MHz bridge. Before adding the physdev flag, only the "tc filter" commands worked but now the iptables commands also

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

If in one time 3 IP adresses using internet. TC script: DEV=eth0 # LAN SERVER_IP=192.168.1.2 # eth0 ip address tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 255 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 384Kbit quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 384Kbit prio 0 quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128Kbit

Hello! My system is: Internet ADSL(PPPoE) ---> ppp0 [LINUX server(router)] eth0 ---> LAN Server(router) is running on LINUX Slackware 8.1. I have recompiled a 2.4.22 kernel, enabled all QoS support in the kernel config, including HTB. My ADSL bandwidth is 256Kbit/s for download and 64Kbit/s for upload. I use the following HTB+IPTABLES configuration, because I want to reduce bandwith for

Hello again, First, excuse me for my poor english. I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something like this: FTP/Webserver ------| eth0 eth1 Mailserver

Hello again, First, excuse me for my poor english. I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something like this: FTP/Webserver ------| eth0 eth1 Mailserver

I have htb on 486 sx with 16mb ram. Slackware 9.1. Connection : dsl 1Mbit. 486 works as router and trafic shaper for network made of 12 pc''s. it does the job quite well, but when i play Counter-Strike or connect to my 486 via ssh (on lan), i get huge lag every 11-20 sec. when i connect to 486 via ssh and run iptraf program i see all the trafic, and after a while when lag comes the

-> Hi! -> -> I''ve a Linux Box that I want to apply a filter -> in order to limit FTP salient traffic from my -> linux box to internet. -> -> I''ve a: -> Red Hat 7.2 -> Kernel 2.4.20 (with HTB built in!) -> iptables 1.2.7a -> -> Also, I get "tc" binnary package from HTB home page. -> -> I have a script in

Hello everyone, First of all, sorry for my poor english. I''ve been working with this for a few weeks and I''m getting sick... I''m trying to control the bandwith in my network using the following script. The machine where the script is running makes NAT, eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the Lan. When I run the script it doesn''t appear any

Hi Guys After googling a little I couldn''t find the correct answer.. When I use : tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.0.11 flowid 1:30 , I can shape traffic to 1:30.( works like a charm) Now instead tc filter I would like to use CLASSIFY as below: iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -d 192.168.0.5 -j CLASSIFY --set-class 1:30 but when I

Hi all, Long email but please be patient :) I am part of EHAS [1], a non profit organization which main goal is to improve the Healthcare assistance in isolated rural areas in developing countries. Recently we have developed a long distance Wi-Fi network in Cuzco (Peru). This network provides connectivity to 12 nodes (they are in fact Health Centers). As VoIP is a essential service in this

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Hi, complete newb and I apologise for it. I have a setup where my linux box has multiple broadband connection where I am routing certain things over certain interfaces, currently 2 links eth2 is a 1500/256 and eth3 is a 512/512, eth0 is the link to the LAN for users. What I am trying to do is traffic shape the information going out eth0 to the local users by the interface the traffic arrived