similar to: Populate table from another table

I am using .keys on a hash to create an array that is than displayed in a view with .each - why does it not display the keys in the order added to the hash? I would like to controll how the array is displayed - I want the checkboxes to display like I added them to the hash, but it doesn''t - I can''t figure out how it is displayed, when I change the order of the hash it

I need a way to upload an image and display it without using any of the plugins that use rmagic. I have used the plugins (file_column, fleximage) which both use rmagic and gave me problems (never got fleximage to work) Thanks in advance - K --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Given that the Document Foundation has now split away from Oracle to continue the development of an independent office suite, do we have any idea which was CentOS and Red Hat are planning to go in this area - OpenOffice or LibreOffice? I know that LibreOffice is not production ready yet - they only have their first beta available, but it's just a matter of (likely a short) time before the

Hello All, I''m wondering what is the canonical way of associating "specific" versions of a module to a node? Is there a way of doing this in puppet? Let me explain a "Use Case" of what I''m trying to accomplish: Say we have created a puppet model called apache to manage and configure apache webserver. We have the apache module under version control and

Hi I''d like to know how to add default text text area using the function text_area. I ''ve tried using value = "....." to do this but with no luck. Could some one please answer my simple question? Thanks. Dan. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Can anyone comment on their experiences with librarian-puppet or using git superproject with per puppet module repositories? We are in the midst of determining which route is optimal for our environment. It seems like using git superprojects would mean one less new tool for everyone to learn. What then would be the advantages of librarian-puppet? Thanks, Ryan Bowlby -- You received this

Hello, I''ve come across an issue that I''m sure is a bug when using after_create with a has_one association, but I''m not 100% certain if I''m missing something. This is pretty much exactly the code I''m using. Two simple classes (Account and Contact) and I create the contact after I create an account (via after_create). I''m not passing in a

Unless I install puppet vis gems, I get the following error when attempting to use librarian-puppet. librarian-puppet /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:779:in `report_activate_error'': Could not find RubyGem puppet (>= 0) (Gem::LoadError) from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:214:in `activate'' from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:249:in

Help please. I''m trying to observe a User class, but I can''t get this to work, the after_create method never gets called... (the breakpoint never gets called) app/models/user_observer.rb: class UserObserver < ActiveRecord::Observer def after_create(user) breakpoint setting =

I''m trying to be a good rails developer and fix DRY violations as i find them. However, i''m trying to fix this one, i cant seem to get it to work. I have two tables A and B that have a one-to-one relationship. Table B belongs_to Table A. Table A has_one Table B. I''m creating instances of Table A in different places, depending on the controller. However, for each

Hi, AFAIK after_create is called after_save if the entry does not exist in the DB. Is there a way to tell if a specific model is new or not in after_save? I have to do something like: def after_save add_to_history ''save'' end def after_create add_to_history ''create'' end However after_save is called when creating too. -- cheers, M.

I wrote this abomination just now, and wonder if anyone else has had experience with the pattern behind it. In short, I''m specing an after_create hook on an ActiveRecord model, that calls a bunch of private methods. Instead of stubbing all those private methods (which is verboten anyway, as well as impossible because creating the object which owns those methods is what I''m

Scenario: I''m creating an image file upload service for my web site. As well as saving the actual file I also need to create a database record for the file. I would like to name the file after the record id, but I also need to save some attributes of the image (width/height/mime_type etc) which I can''t discover until after the file is created. The Problem: 1) The id is not

Hi there, I''ve been looking for a while now and can''t seem to find where I''m going wrong.. I''m following a railscast tutorial to send invites out to people. there''s n invitation.rb page: class Invitation < ActiveRecord::Base #attr_accessible :sender_id, :recipient_email, :token, :sent_at belongs_to :sender, :class_name =>

Hi all. I am actually using ActiveRecord outside of Rails but I don''t see that it matters for this question. I want to automatically create a registration entry when I add a new user to my application. This works fine, but it''s not automatic: class User < ActiveRecord :: Base has_many :registrations end class Test user = User.new user.registrations.create end

Hi all I''m moving to using Machinist in my rspec tests and am having a problem with an after_create callback method that i need to stub out. It seems like calling ClassName.make will trigger this callback before i''ve had the chance to stub it. Can i stub it in my blueprint for that class? Or, can i stub the method for all instances of the class before i call ClassName.make?

Hi all, I am having a lot of trouble to get the default value of text fields when they are generated by a partial from a collection. I have been on this for a whole week and I didnt find a single exemple on the internet of someone using a partial that generate text field with a default value. I cant believe that I am the only one having this problem. Anyone has an exemple they can show me?

I''ve got a model Message, which needs to send an email using action mailer after it''s first saved in the database. I want to pass the model to the mailer which then uses methods on the message model to render the email. So the natural way to do this is in an after_create callback on the Message model. But I can''t see an easy way to test this. Here''s my spec

so i have an after_create method on my track model that kicks off a background process that converts an mp3 to a swf. this is working fine locally on my machine, but upon moving it to my production server, i am getting the following error. I''ve only been using backgroundRB for like 48 hours, so i''m not really sure what this means or where to go. any ideas?

Hi all I have the following model: class PhotoGallery < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :title, :description, :file_path, :title_photo_id has_many :photos, :dependent => :destroy belongs_to :title_photo, :class_name => ''Photo'', :foreign_key => ''title_photo_id'' validates_presence_of :title, :description, :file_path