similar to: tbf initial burst

in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket -> keep token for sending with rate second bucket -> keep ctoken for sending with ceil rate Is it true?? may be i''m misunderstand about token/bucket thoery _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Dear All, I''m using the kernel 2.6.6, iproute2-2.4.7.20020116, iptables v1.2.9, and gentoo. I have a leased-line 64 kbps. I can see the counter works in iptables, but in the htb, it doesn''t go to the right class (it always go to the default class). Any help will be appreciated here''s my htb conf #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root

Hi, What exactly are the "tokens"? I thought each token allowed the sending of one byte, that tokens are stored in a bucket that can hold a max of "burst" tokens, and that this bucket is filled with tokens at "rate". But theory does not seem to explain the "tc -s .." output in the examples below. And I can''t figure out why or how... #tc qdisc

Hello! I need to switch from htb2 to htb3, because of speed issues (for me, htb2 is unable to handle more then 100mbit duplex with ~550 classes), kernel profiling shows htb_dequeue_prio at 1st place with 3x isolation. So, I''ve moved from 2.4.19 to 2.4.25 kernel (hi-pac for classification/marking and htb3 for queueing), and traffic rate drop from 100 to 20mbit. What can be wrong? The

Hi, machine: AMD K6 200 MHz Linux distribution: Mandrake 8.1 kernel: compiled 2.4.21 applied this: #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in file linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h bevore compiled the kernel (described on http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/40.html) bandwitch on eth0: 128kbit The most simple configuration - 122kbit guaranted for WWW (sport 80) and

Hi, I wanted to implement some QOS on my Linux Box with HTB, but after some time spend on the configuration and tests, I still don''t manage to have some correct results. Here are the details : -ROOT 2000 kbits -HIGHPRIO SUBCLASS 50 kbits prio 0 -SUBCLASS1 750 kbits prio 1 -SERVICE1 250 kbits prio 1

Hi all, Can you tell me where is the documentation for the new IFB (implemented in kernels > 2.6.16). Thanks in advance! Nikolay

Andreas, Since I understand your ASCII art and comments, I would very much appreciate it if you would draw what you see and criticize the following. Hopefully I''ll better understand after that! TIA, gypsy tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 4522kbit ceil \ 4760kbit burst 16k cburst 16k quantum 1500 tc class add

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

Hello, 1. I currently have a 128kbps cable link to the internet..and I''m sharing this connection with others. I''ve made the following script(for alocating bandwidth depending on the services used: browsing, squid, games like counter-strike, icmp, ssh), which unfortunately isn''t working very well as the response times I''m getting upon pinging the server

Hi guys, i have a little doubt ; I have eth0 ethernet and eth1 wireless , and they are bridged in br0 Is there any difference in the behavior between do tc qdisc add dev br0 root sfq OR tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq && tc qdisc add dev eth1 root sfq -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o

Martin Devera wrote: > If you read the manual, the algorithm will not work correctly > with {,c}burst < MTU ... > devik > I just tried to change {,c}burst to 1600, or leaving them by default but no visible result. here is the latest tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1:101 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 40Kbit ceil 40Kbit burst 1599b/8 mpu 0b cburst 1599b/8 mpu 0b quantum 512 level

Eric, I''ve attached the output from the command you requested below. I''m using kernel 2.6.17.12 and tc version ss060323. I''m have a nforce4 onboard giggabit controller using the forcedeth driver, if that makes a difference. Charlie, I''ll take a look at the Apache model for throttling, thanks. I was going for tc because was going to try to add additional

I have this: class htb 1:29 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 3000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1599b cburst 1611b Sent 33233 bytes 772 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 415 borrowed: 357 giants: 0 tokens: -3756376 ctokens: 128779 or this: class htb 1:21 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 3000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1599b cburst 1611b Sent 57554 bytes 618 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 193 borrowed: 425

Hi, I have implemented QOS classifiers using TC with HTB. The classification is working. I would like to know whether there is some tool which will help me in monitoring the bandwidth share of the various classes. Thanks, Vinod C

Hi, I''m trying to perform some (what I consider) basic traffic shaping on our network utilising HTB. I have mostly reused the example on the lartc.org site: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 24k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50mbit ceil 80mbit burst 19k tc class add dev eth0

tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:10 rate 30kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:11 rate 10kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:12 rate 60kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src 172.16.11.2 flowid 1:10 i login

In this simple htb setup: # tc -s -d class ls dev eth0 class htb 1:1 root rate 300000bit ceil 300000bit burst 1749b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1749b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 13171835 bytes 13169 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 45848bit 10pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 5272 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: -84429 ctokens: -84429 class htb 1:2 parent 1:1 prio 0

We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps international internet pipe / , as this: Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting Network lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an

Dear all, I''m having real problems getting tc to do anything useful at all. I''m also under pressure to get this fixed before the students start arriving later this month (I work in a university). In short, I want each IP address to be hard limited to 128kbit down, 64kbit up, never to be allowed more bandwidth than this. It is also important that the latency remains