similar to: HTB Rate and Prio (continued)

Hi, I wanted to implement some QOS on my Linux Box with HTB, but after some time spend on the configuration and tests, I still don''t manage to have some correct results. Here are the details : -ROOT 2000 kbits -HIGHPRIO SUBCLASS 50 kbits prio 0 -SUBCLASS1 750 kbits prio 1 -SERVICE1 250 kbits prio 1

First, I apologize if this message has been received multiple times. I''m having problems subscribing to this mailing list: Hi xen-users, I am trying to decide whether I should run a game server inside a Xen domain. My primary reason for wanting to virtualize is because I want to isolate this environment from the rest of my server. I really like the idea of isolating the game server

Since commit 39e6c8208d7b ("net: solve a NAPI race") napi has been able to be rescheduled within napi_complete_done() even in non-busypoll case, but virtnet_poll() always enabled interrupts before complete, and when napi was rescheduled within napi_complete_done() it did not disable interrupts. This caused more interrupts when event idx is disabled. According to commit cbdadbbf0c79

Since commit 39e6c8208d7b ("net: solve a NAPI race") napi has been able to be rescheduled within napi_complete_done() even in non-busypoll case, but virtnet_poll() always enabled interrupts before complete, and when napi was rescheduled within napi_complete_done() it did not disable interrupts. This caused more interrupts when event idx is disabled. According to commit cbdadbbf0c79

Hi all, I used netperf to measure throughput between dom0 & domU. The throughput between dom0 -> domU was 256.00 Mb/sec domU -> dom0 was 401.15 Mb/sec. The throughput between dom0 & domU seems to be very asymmetry. To my surprise the throughput between domU -> dom0 is more. The value which I specified are consistent values. Is

Hi i want see if my QoS are good because i am not very sure ... the VoIP quality are not very good when i download. I have on my Linux routeur/Firewall Asterisk .. and i have into my config : ================================================ tcdevices: eth0 2000kbit 2000kbit tcclasses: eth0 1 100kbit 180kbit 1 tos=0x68/0xfc,tos=0xb8/0xfc eth0 2 full/4 full

Sometimes we need to coalesce the rx frags to avoid frag list. One example is virtio-net driver which tries to use small frags for both MTU sized packet and GSO packet. So this patch introduce skb_coalesce_rx_frag() to do this. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet

Sometimes we need to coalesce the rx frags to avoid frag list. One example is virtio-net driver which tries to use small frags for both MTU sized packet and GSO packet. So this patch introduce skb_coalesce_rx_frag() to do this. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet

Hello, we have one application which gets some data from our database but to print just one result it connects many times to the database over WAN. Of course there are some performance related problems with this type of work. I'd like to analyze (not necessary online) its tcp flow especially its latency (using port redirect on switch). Do you know any software (similar to tcpdump or so) which

Sometimes we need to coalesce the rx frags to avoid frag list. One example is virtio-net driver which tries to use small frags for both MTU sized packet and GSO packet. So this patch introduce skb_coalesce_rx_frag() to do this. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet

Sometimes we need to coalesce the rx frags to avoid frag list. One example is virtio-net driver which tries to use small frags for both MTU sized packet and GSO packet. So this patch introduce skb_coalesce_rx_frag() to do this. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet

Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over network. Tested with both SAMBA and NFS. Is it normal? FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Sep 6 01:52:12 CEST 2008 fxp0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc83f mem 0xe1021000-0xe1021fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci1 # ifconfig fxp0 fxp0:

Hi everyone, I''m doing some networking experiments over high BDP topologies. Right now the configuration is quite simple -- two Xen boxes connected via a dummynet router. The dummynet router is set to limit bandwidth to 500Mbps and simulate an RTT of 80ms. I''m using the following sysctl values: net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 4194304 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096

Sometimes we need to coalesce the rx frags to avoid frag list. One example is virtio-net driver which tries to use small frags for both MTU sized packet and GSO packet. So this patch introduce skb_coalesce_rx_frag() to do this. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet

Sometimes we need to coalesce the rx frags to avoid frag list. One example is virtio-net driver which tries to use small frags for both MTU sized packet and GSO packet. So this patch introduce skb_coalesce_rx_frag() to do this. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet

I'm looking to expand my bandwidth for my Asterisk PBX. Why should I choose a T1 over DSL for my asterisk server? I found someone offering T1's for $290 a month + Loops or 3 Meg for $561 a month + Loops. Is this a good deal? Thanks Bart -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi There, We currently using iproute2 for load balancing. However we need more upload speed as we load balance over 3 dsl lines. I''ve been looking for a way to combine the upload speed to more faster. Found a site called www.upstreaminter.net where these guys bond the adsl channels to improve uploads, Since downloading is problem as its need to know the ip address of the downloader they

Hi all, I have a script that allocates an ADSL(1500K/256K) bandwidth to three users. My idea is to allow each user having a guarentee rate, while each one is allowed to burst to the max rate while no one is using the bandwidth. I use imq0 for uplink (for some mobility reason) and imq1 for downlink. Everything works smoothly except for VoIP traffic. There are three VoIP phones attached to a

Hi, I've had an inquiry for a small UK call centre, mostly outbound calls. I get the impression they are mainly calling 3G mobile phones, monthly phone bill, with calls is approx ?5,000 for several feature lines. How feasible is something like this with asterisk? I guess one big question is which type of circuit to use, ADSL in the UK is only 256kbs upstream, some providers do bonding but

Hi! I do a rsync between 2 machines. The throughput is only 2 MByte/Sec. Each machine is a Supermicro server with 2 x 8 Core Opteron 6128 64 GByte of ECC RAM 1 LSI MegaRAID SAS 9280-24i4e 24 x 2TByte SATA Disks as a RAID6 2 Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network-cards Both run Ubuntu 11.04 64Bit. Both use rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 There are no