similar to: Problems with iproute2

Can I add routes to rt_tables by hand with the vi editor? If I add a route to that file, it will be there if I reboot the box? I am sure there are stupid questions but I can''t find the answer into the papers I have here. Luis Miguel Cruz Miranda. CCNA - Systems Administrator _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hello List, We just migrated from a PPC Xserve to an Intel Xserve. I used "rsync" to bring everyone's home directories over, and in the back of my mind wondered about how it would handle the binary index files... only one way to find out! :) Once I tried to login to IMAP, I got the following results: May 6 19:46:48 posh dovecot[1169]: IMAP(cabel): Rebuilding index file

You need a combination of iptables and iproute2 to do what you want = because routing is based on it's DESTINATION address and you need to route on = your SOURCE address so it uses a different route depending on which source = IP is in the packet.. Refer to this page which is sort of what you want BUT not exact. It'll = give you some ideas...

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway assignment to either of those addresses and it just works. I can connect to my computers from the outside by port forwarding from my routers to the computer that I

i´ve been searching for a load balance solution since a month ago... what i can say is that it simply doesn´t work. I was unable to find one guy that did it with sucess. When "load balance" is the subject of the message on the list, the message is simply ignored. So... if it doesn´t work... why LARTC don´t delete it from the HOW TO and answer us with some "it simply doesn´t

Hi, I have a router that got its second link. I was trying to do load balancing, but i can not get it to work properly. Just one link works at time, and is always the second in the command ip route add default table 222 proto static. Am I missing something? My script is below. I am using Debian, tried with kernel 2.6.19 (my compilation) or debian''s one (2.6.18-3-486), same results

hi all, we were trying to configure our system with 2 ethernet catds connected to two different providers using iproute2 so that it recieves and transmits data from both of them. We have followed the configuration as given on lartc''s howto But the most wierd part of the story is that after we restart the system (We have put the script in rc.local) the system works fine and we can ping

Dear all, I am having problem using iproute2 on my new Slackware 10.1 box. Here goes the problem: root@localhost:~# echo "200 DOONET" >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables root@localhost:~# cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables # # reserved values # 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec # # local # #1 inr.ruhep 200 DOONET root@localhost:~# ip rule add from 10.255.255.0/24

Hi all; I have a custom iproute2 table and a few rules to go along with it (CentOS 5) -- I have added the table to /etc/iproute2/rt_tables. if-up and friends doesn't seem to handle this real gracefully. How are those of you out there doing something similar managing this customization? I don't really want to muck with /etc/init.d/network or the if-up scripts to avoid breaking upgrades.

Hi There, I've been having an issue trying to figure out a way to policy route outbound packets from a multihomed machine through the proper interface using IPFW to no avail. I've tried several different incantations of IPFW fwd/forward statements, and none of them seem to do the trick. Basically, I have a host that has multiple Internet connections. This host is running FreeBSD 4.9

Hi. The task: 1. There 3 servers and a router with 2 PPPoE connections (let call them: ppp0, ppp1). 2. There are several groups of Inet-clients to be served (Servers, Clients and Club). 3. The task is: - to route Club through the ppp1; - to Servers and Clients through ppp0; (Next is reproduced from memory and may be slightly incorrect) router # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table

Hi guys I installed ocfs2 on 4 node (redhat 4u3) on shared FC devices ( EMC storage ). So I've noticed several problems: 1. When I restart first node, it shutdown so slow and I have to power off machine. What is the problem, heartbeat timeout, dlm ? 2. What will happen when I plug off network cabel ( for interconnect ). What shoud I do, unmount ocfs2 volume on each node, stop ocfs2

Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help. Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the patch. Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors:

Is anybody using Asterisk with a dual WAN router (Xincom XC-DPG602, Hawking H2WR54G, Fortinet FortiGate-60, SonicWall etc) ? -- #Joseph

Hello Peter, The attached patch contains three small (although 2 of them are fundamental :) fixes for pxelinux 1. Alignment error when more than one initramfs are loaded using initrd - the alignment of the last disk is discarded in calculations but is ALWAYS present when the loading procedure is called. As a result - the second image (cpio) is not recognized. 2. On some platforms

Hi, Apologies for the cross-posting; I''m not sure whether this is a firewall or routing issue, or both! I have four network cards, detailed below. eth0 and eth3 connect to my ISPs, and eth1 and eth2 connect to local networks. I want to route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and from eth1 to eth3. However, I am having a few problems with this. eth0 ip: 192.168.100.253/24 gw:

Hi guys, i have a problem with a configuration what i''m trying to do. I have two computers with linux, A and B, connected in the same network with this configuration: PC1 A: 192.168.192.1 PC2 B: 192.168.192.30 The PC1 A is a firewall doing nat... this one is connected to the internet via an adsl modem and of course it have its own public ip , and the router B is a smtp server but

Beta 1 is now availablew for testing. Problems Corrected: 1) Previously, the Shorewall and Shorewall6 install.sh scripts did two things wrong with respect to the /etc/shorewall[6]/routes file: - The existing file was unconditionally removed. - A skeleton file was not installed when SPARSE was not set in the shorewallrc file. Additionally, the installer would remove

Beta 1 is now availablew for testing. Problems Corrected: 1) Previously, the Shorewall and Shorewall6 install.sh scripts did two things wrong with respect to the /etc/shorewall[6]/routes file: - The existing file was unconditionally removed. - A skeleton file was not installed when SPARSE was not set in the shorewallrc file. Additionally, the installer would remove