similar to: TCP window based shaping

Hi all, I have released Precise Software Pacer (PSPacer) version 1.0 under the GNU GPL license. PSPacer achieves precise pacing (regulating bandwidth and smoothing of bursty traffic) without any special hardware. In the past, some software-based pacing schemes have been proposed. However, they have been hard to implement, because they require that the operating system maintains a high

I'm Takano. Now, a system such as the following by cooperation with the Samba and Windows ActiveDirectory We would like to build. ☆Samba OS：CentOS7 Samba：(ver4.4.5) ☆Windows(ActiveDirectory) OS：Windows Server 2003 ※State functional level is raised from 2000 to 2003. That you want to achieve it will be following. ・Create a domain controller (samba.test) on the Samba server side. ・And set

Hi all, I have evaluated Fusion-io ioDrive duo (PCIe direct attached NAND flash memory storage) on the CentOS 5.4. The experimental result shows the write performance with multiple jobs (processes) on the ext3/ext4 filesystems is lower than that of XFS. The question I have is what is the cause of the ext3/ext4 performance limitation. I have measured the random write performance on several

Thanks Mike. My data has longitude and latitude coords and I used distAB {clim.pact} then mst {ape} to calculate my minimum spanning tree. The nodes are telecoms sites from all over Australia. My goal is to determine the minimum cost of linking them via cabling, and I'm starting by calculating the distance "as the crow flies", but will probably eventually need to calculate the

Hello! After process, error continue...... ---------------------------------------------------------------- C: \ Users \ USER1XXX> gpupdate / force Updating Policy ... Unable to update user policy successfully. The following errors for found: Group Policy was not processed. Windows was unable to apply the settings registry-based policy for the LDAP Group Policy object LDAP://CN

Is there any known issues when trying to run CentOS (x86 or x64) on a fresh install of vmware 4.1? Details as to why I am asking are here in the CentOS forums: https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=DESC&topic_id=28521&forum=39 Thanks! -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hallo I have recently implemented a Fedora core 2 Linux box with ebtables and HTB for doing some traffic shaping What I would like to know is if there are some way to change the packet or frame sizes of the traffic that passes through this type of system. If I am understand correctly this will also help with the bandwidth, maybe not on throughput but definitely on continues throughput if the

The university is like a ISP to give access to Internet to several faculties, but we want to restrict the traffic, we needed a traffic shaper to do this, I wanted to have something like (Packeteer INTEL NETSTRUCTURE 7370 aplication server) which it is a bridge where I not need IP for my networks cards. somebody knows one good one to work it on Linux? Regards.

Hello, copying idmap is fairly straightforward. 1) on your first DC (that one that has PDC FSMO, and is the source for rsync) create backup of idmap.ldb tdbbackup -s .bak /path/to/samba/private/idmap.ldb it will create idmap.ldb.bak 2) stop samba service on second DC 3) copy idmap.ldb.bak from first dc to second dc, lose the .bak suffix and just copy it over idmap.ldb on second dc 4)

Hi Takano, You wrote: ※The direction of the trust Samba server → Windows server Which should mean, according to some MS book sitting on my desk, that you want Samba domain to trust MS domain. In the Samba FAQ, here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Does_Samba_support_trust_relationship_with_AD.3F you can read "Samba can be trusted, but can't trust yet." According to that, if

I am trying to install centos 4.2 on an Asus P5LD2-VM and cannot for the life of me get networking to work. The installer does not see the onboard Gbit ethernet port nor can I configure at after installation. It gives no errors when I modprobe e1000 to insert the drivers but I cannot "ifup eth0" without getting a "device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying

I tried looking for a file of the same size and the gfid doesnt show up, 8><--- [root at glusterp2 fb]# pwd /bricks/brick1/gv0/.glusterfs/ea/fb [root at glusterp2 fb]# ls -al total 3130892 drwx------. 2 root root 64 May 22 13:01 . drwx------. 4 root root 24 May 8 14:27 .. -rw-------. 1 root root 3294887936 May 4 11:07 eafb8799-4e7a-4264-9213-26997c5a4693 -rw-r--r--. 1 root

On 2019/1/2 ??9:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:28:43AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2018/12/31 ??2:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:00:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2018/12/26 ??11:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:17:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2019/1/2 ??9:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:28:43AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2018/12/31 ??2:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:00:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2018/12/26 ??11:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:17:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 22:21 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:58:33PM +0000, Jon Gerdes wrote: > > winbind has a concept of offline and online but I don't know what > > that > > is, nor how nss works with it. I've tried using smbcontrol to tell > > winbind it is offline or online but that does not seem to work. > > Restarting

On 2019/1/7 ??11:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:14:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2019/1/2 ??9:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:28:43AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2018/12/31 ??2:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:00:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2019/1/7 ??11:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:14:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2019/1/2 ??9:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:28:43AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2018/12/31 ??2:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:00:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2018/12/6 ??6:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > When use_napi is set, let's enable BQLs. Note: some of the issues are > similar to wifi. It's worth considering whether something similar to > commit 36148c2bbfbe ("mac80211: Adjust TSQ pacing shift") might be > benefitial. I've played a similar patch several days before. The tricky part is the mode switching

On 2018/12/6 ??6:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > When use_napi is set, let's enable BQLs. Note: some of the issues are > similar to wifi. It's worth considering whether something similar to > commit 36148c2bbfbe ("mac80211: Adjust TSQ pacing shift") might be > benefitial. I've played a similar patch several days before. The tricky part is the mode switching

On 2018/12/31 ??2:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:00:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2018/12/26 ??11:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:17:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2018/12/6 ??6:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> When use_napi is set, let's enable BQLs. Note: some of the issues