similar to: Mark all traffic except browsing

Hi, I have the following config: 1 PC with 3 NICs, that shares internet connection to LAN. eth0 uses a public IP ($public_ip_1) eth1 uses a private IP ($private_ip) eth2 uses a public IP ($public_ip_2) I have a webserver and a mailserver accesible by $public_ip_1 (eth0) I have a LAN with all terminals using private IPs, and $private_ip (eth1) as gateway. $public_ip_1 and $public_ip_2 are from

Hi, I´ve been using iptraf for real time traffic monitoring and it works fine. But I would like to know if anyone knows other package to monitor traffic per IP in real time, without requiring each IP''s MAC address as I have some terminals behind a router that hides their MAC. Cacti/MRTG works like this but not in real time. Thanks for your ideas. Regards, Edo

Hi, Currently I´m using the following iptables rule to mark packets in order to shape traffic: iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.50/32 -j MARK --set-mark 50 So my question is, is there a limit in the numbers that can be used as marks? And also, can only numbers be used as marks? How about: iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.50/32 -j MARK

Hi all !! I would to like to mark and route some kind of traffic (ie: outbound www, now by simplicity) ---inet1--------eth0------------| | | linux | --eth1------- clientes ---inet2(90.0.0.1)--------eth2-| | I have eth0 and eth1 bridged (eth2 is not bridged). I would to route www outbound clients

Hi all !! I would to like to mark and route some kind of traffic (ie: outbound www, now by simplicity) ---inet1--------eth0------------| | | linux | --eth1------- clientes ---inet2(90.0.0.1)--------eth2-| | I have eth0 and eth1 bridged (eth2 is not bridged). I would to route www outbound clients

Hi, I use for a customer a Linux router/firewall with 1 internal interface connected to the LAN and 3 external interfaces connected to 3 different ISP. I use a kernel 2.6.17 with a routes patch from Julian Anastasov. I mark outgoing FTP traffic for the routing. With the rules below I do not have a problem with the active/normal FTP to connect on FTP server. But the passive FTP does not pass

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589 Summary: MARK doesn't work properly with incoming traffic Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

Hi everyone, My HTB script is showing me those "r2q change" warnings. I read that I should test with r2q values to gain accuracy and stop the warnings but I made some tests with r2q and with burst and I still get the warnings. Any ideas on this issue will be very helpful. The script seems to be working as the bandwidth for the IPs is being shaped. The NIC works at 100mbit and the

Hi everyone; I have a problem on my 10 nodes cluster with ocfs2 1.2.9 and the OS is RHEL 4.7 AS. 9 nodes can start o2cb service and mount san disks on startup however one node can not do that. My cluster configuration is : node: ip_port = 7777 ip_address = 192.168.5.1 number = 0 name = fa01 cluster = ocfs2 node: ip_port =

I have a setup with lot's of small files (Maildir), in 4 different volumes and for some reason the volumes are full when they reach 60% usage (as reported by df ). This was ofcourse a bit of a supprise for me .. lots of failed writes, bounced messages and very angry customers. Has anybody on this list seen this before (not the angry customers ;-) ? Regards, =paulv # echo "ls

I looked around, found older post which seems not applicable anymore. I have a cluster of 2 nodes right now, which has 3 OCFS2 file systems. All the file systems were formatted with 4 node slots. I added the two news nodes (by hand, by ocfs2console and o2cb_ctl), so my /etc/ofcfs/cluster.conf looks right: node: ip_port = 7777 ip_address = 192.168.201.1 number = 0

hi there i try to setup OCFS2 with loop device /dev/loop0 i've 4 servers running SLES10 SP2. internal ip's: 192.168.55.1, .2, .3 and .6 my cluster.conf: -------------------------------------------- node: ip_port = 7777 ip_address = 192.168.55.1 number = 0 name = www cluster = cawww node: ip_port = 7777 ip_address = 192.168.55.2

Etx1 - First Internet Line - eth0 Ext2 - Second Internet line - eth2 LAN - Local Area Network - eth1 Other traffic - Ext1 -------+-------+--------------- Ext2 ---Web goes Here eth0 | |eth2 +-------+-------+ | ROUTER | +----+------+---+ |eth1 192.168.0.0/24 -----------------+ | 192.168.0.1/24------------------- - Gateway |

One thing that is bothering me about my controller specs is that sometimes I end up with a number of examples that are the same except for the example name. The reason that this happens is that I''ve expressed all the expected behavior with should_receive. While this does more or less work as intended it doesn''t feel right. As an example, let''s say I''m writing

I notice when issuing the command "net rpc user testuser -S ip_address -U administrator%password" that the testuser gets added to the remote machine (Win 2k3) sucessfully, however the account is disabled. After adding the user remotely it requires that the administrator log into the remote machine "ip_address" to enable the newly created account. Is there a way to add a user

R-sig-Debian help, I have installed an ODBC Driver for Linux. I want to connect to our database through R via: >library(RODBC) >con <- odbcDriverConnect("SERVER=IP_address:PORT;DRIVER=ORACLE;DATABASE=MAGNUS") Warning message: In odbcDriverConnect("SERVER=IP_address:PORT;DRIVER=ORACLE;DATABASE=MAGNUS") : ODBC connection failed I don't really know whether this

Hello, I've got an Ubuntu Workstation integrated in an Active Directory domain. I'm really authenticated to the domain (with Kerberos clients, Winbind and Samba) and I can list the users of the domain with the wbinfo command. There's a DFS root share that is defined on each DC of the AD domain. When I try to mount that share with the mount.smbfs command : # mount -t smbfs

On 12/16/2013 08:53 AM, Joaquim Barrera wrote: [please don't top-post on technical lists] > Excuse me for the duplicate anwer but I observed exactly what I was > telling you. I execute "sudo ./run tools/virsh" and then: If you are running virsh as sudo, then you must remember that virsh is running under root, not you. > > 'connect

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20110303/0fbefee6/attachment.html

Is there a way to have extensions automatically created for registered sip users ? I did some investigation and found some hope in chan_sip with relation to the somewhat undocumented usereqphone option but i may be totally off track. All i want to be able to do is send a call to number@ip_address where the number is the username configured on the phone that has registered with asterisk