similar to: Simple routing configuration

Hi, Apologies for the cross-posting; I''m not sure whether this is a firewall or routing issue, or both! I have four network cards, detailed below. eth0 and eth3 connect to my ISPs, and eth1 and eth2 connect to local networks. I want to route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and from eth1 to eth3. However, I am having a few problems with this. eth0 ip: 192.168.100.253/24 gw:

Hi, I have emailed the list before (email can be found here http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q4/017220.html) regarding this matter. Basically, I am trying to set up a router for my college, to route conference guests over an adsl line, and students over an academic connection. I''ve looked at man ip(8), and a few examples, and think I have a configuration that will work, but was

Hi, I have a linux router with 4 ethernet cards; eth0 through eth3. Basically, all I want to do is route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and all traffic from eth1 to eth3. I''ve looked through the LARTC how-to, specifically at chapter 4, about multiple providers. However, I am still a bit confused, and not sure how to set up my routing tables, as my scenario differs from the one in the

Hi, I am trying to set up a linux box to act as a router for my college. There are two different types of users; students and conference guests, and they have IPs statically assigned by DHCP, from separate ranges (but they are on the same subnet). The students go out onto an academic connection (via eth0), and conference guests go out on an ADSL line (via eth3). eth1 and eth2 are configured for

ok i will do it in text: 66.92.114.46 eth0 209.141.2.194 eth1 192.168.119.101 eth2 192.168.120.101 eth3 What i have is a linux box RH7.3 which will eventually run Shorewall Firewall. On this box there is eth0 66.92.114.46 conneted to isp1 and eth1 209.141.2.194 connected to isp2 It also has eth2 192.168.119.101 and eth3 192.168.120.101 which will connect to a failover appliance which has 2 wan

I am running a public core router using private links from my provider. Details: RH7.3 9 interfaces (all Intel) eth0 is default gateway and has a private IP address all other interfaces are links to other routers or networks eth3 has a public IP address The core router will rarely need to access sites out on the internet, but when it does it cannot get there because the eth0 has a private IP

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet connections, both with static IP's, and two are connected to our private network. The two internet facing nics seem to be battling over the gateway designation. Which ever I designate as the gateway the other stops responding to incoming traffic. I need both to listen to inbound traffic. One for our main web page and the other

Hello,I have single linux router ( fedora core 1 ), 2 ISP, 1 internal network,1 IP space from every ISP My scenario: eth0 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 1 eth1 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 2 eth2 1.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP1 eth3 2.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP2 Config I try: /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 10 isp1 20 isp2 ip

Hello, We have 3 DSL connections connected to eth3 and another interface with a dedicated link in eth0 (main table) We want to balance selected traffic (using fwmark and iptables) through our 3 DSL connections in a secondary table named DSL (without using the dedicated link in eth0), but the next command is not accepted, and gives us the following error: # ip route add default

Hi! I have a setup where I want to prefer traffic on one port (for testing purposes I used port 22) my setup is : tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:7 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

Dear all, If I do cause offence by posting OT here I apologise in advance, I am however desperate for help and after posting on other forums without any ideas I know many networking experts will see this here and hope they can enlighten me. I will gladly donate some PayPal money to the person who can help. I have a leased line on 83.111.160.6 (/30 subnet, gw is 83.111.160.5), and they

Hi All, I''m using HTB to shape traffic, a little like this: tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 htb tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1:0 htb tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1: protocol 0x8100 prio 5 u32 match u16 3000 0x0fff at 0 flowid 1:1 action ipt -j MARK --or-mark 0x01000000 tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol 0x8100 prio 5 u32 match u16 3000 0x0fff at 0 flowid 1:1 action

Hello, I''m having such problem with HFSC with following config: + tc qdisc del dev eth3 root + tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: hfsc default 2 + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 512kbit ul rate 512kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 2kbit ul rate 400kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 hfsc ls rate 32kbit ul rate

Hi, I managed to fix 128kbit for an IP address of 192.168.200.3 as below: - tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100mbit tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 128kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst 192.168.200.3 flowid 1:1 tc qdisc add dev eth3 parent 1:1 sfq perturb 10 How can I

Hi all, i''m puzzled by a ploblem and I don''t know how to debug it... I have a firewall with 2 gateways, adsl and isdn. Main gateway is via adsl, backup via isdn. I setup 2 table ''adsl'' and ''isdn''. You can find a description below. I made a script to test both tables. That mainly 1. adds an iptables -t mangle -A

It seems like tos should be considered when sorting routes on insertion. Consider this out-of-order route creation: # ip route add 1.1.0.0/24 table 3 nexthop via 192.168.0.23 # ip route add 1.1.0.1/32 table 3 nexthop via 192.168.0.24 # ip route show table 3 1.1.0.1 via 192.168.0.24 dev eth3 1.1.0.0/24 via 192.168.0.23 dev eth3 ok... it''s re-ordered the routes - it makes sense, the

I''ve made some tests... eth2 is my internal interface, LAN is connected here. Before I had IMQ device in AB mode... PREROUTING [A]fter NAT, POSTROUTING [B]efore NAT. I want the same situation on ifb. I do this in this way: --- # incoming traffic here from LAN is before NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle ffff: ingress # outcoming traffic here from WAN is after NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2

This one is really throwing me. Thanks in advance for any advice. I''m working on a 4 port firewall system. It is running heartbeat+drbd. Primary box looks like this: eth0 -> net/cicso router 192.168.144.2/29 eth1 -> drbd/heartbeat crossover cable 192.168.254.253/30 eth2 -> dmz 192.168.144.10/24 eth3 -> loc 192.168.101.2/24 The IP''s