similar to: rate 0bit

I have a Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.11) server. Several months ago, I made a traffic shaping setup for my box (running a 2.4 kernel then) that worked beautifully. It gave high priority to SSH and RealAudio traffic, and put HTTP downloading traffic on a lower prio so they could only use what bandwidth was left. However, I''ve only just realized that tc is no longer accepting the commands I

Hi I''m completely stuck with the tcng language - I assume there must be some way to arrange queues hierachically like eth1 | TBF | PRIO / \ class class but my attempt (below) produces a "inferno.tc:8: qdisc "tbf" has no classes near "prio"" when run through tcc. dev eth1 { egress { tbf (rate 128kbps, burst 64kb,

Hi, I''m using tc and HTB to shape my outgoing ADSL traffic. I was trying to make some graphs on the classes by meassuring the "sent bytes" of each class using rrdtool to store the data (as kbps after conversion). I expected that meassuring the root class I would get values similar that the ones I get measuring the interface counters but they differ by a large amount. Is

Hi all ! I''m building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem, and i think i''m doing something wrong, but i can''t find what. Please excuse my terrible english, i''m french. >From what i''ve read, tc is the tool i need. I read the documentations, readmes and lartc.org

Hello, I am interrested in the monitoring of the qos qdiscs parameters such as size of the queue, enqueues, dequeues, delay in queue, I made a tool to have those results availlable at http://rawsoft.org, but it will probably not work anymore because of the kernel evolutions (the file sch_red.c is patched for the tool to work). I would like to have all the necessary data coming from the kernel

I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this does not seem to work: wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source

Hi, I''ve been migrating an existing htb-based traffic shaper from a hideous (I''m allowed to call it that - I wrote the damn atrocity myself) tc shell script into a TCNG configuration file, and after a few false starts I think I managed to get the syntax right. However, during tests it looks like some of the tiers aren''t passing their restrictions on to lower levels.

I''m attempting to set up a hierarchy of tc qdiscs with filters, but the filters don''t seem to be working correctly.  I''m running iptables 1.3.5 with iproute 2.6.16.20060323 on a Gentoo 2.6.18 kernel.  The system takes all my tc setup, but does not filter packets as I am expecting it to based on my ruleset. My tc qdiscs and classes are added correctly and report as

Hi, I am a newbie to LARTC and to this mailing-list. I have read through the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO many times, trying to understand Classful Queueing Disciplines (and in particular CBQ). I have some suggestions that I think will help to make the HOWTO more understandable. Suggestions ========= (1) In section 9.4 (Terminology) the definition for

Hi! Do you know somthing about hfsc and bps? There''s no output for speed only for packets. Doesn''t hfsc support such a field? tc -s class show dev eth0 class hfsc 1: root Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 period 0 level 2 class hfsc 1:11 parent 1:1 sc m1 0bit d 18.0ms m2 1000Kbit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2

Hi I am the author of /etc/net project (http://etcnet.org/), which along with other features provides QoS support. This support is done through a hierarchical configuration tree for each interface, which is translated into ''tc'' command sequence. Filters are supported and for each filter parent is determined automatically during translation: it is the last qdisc seen in the tree.

Help! I can''t get TCNG to compile!!! It did this on 2 different machines! Here are the errors: -------------------------------------------- Kernel: 2.4.22 [root@localhost tcng]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.22-1.2149.nptl #1 Wed Jan 7 13:08:26 EST #if KFULLVERSIONNUM >= 0x20416 /* gratuitous interface change in 2.4.22 :-( */ ERROR: ake -f Makefile.unclean tcsim make[2]:

Thanks for quick reply Andreas! > Every class is allowed to use bandwidth as long as it does not have to > borrow (the specified rate is guaranteed). Prio in HTB only affects > borrowing bandwidth from other classes... In the example below, the class > 1:5 should be allowed to borrow bandwidth before 1:14 does. Thats exactly what I want from HTB to do..to prio the borrowed bandwidth.

I thought I had this all worked out, but it seems not. The following tc configuration: tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: tbf rate 120kbit burst 1200 limit 1 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: prio bands 3 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 20 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 20 tc

Hi folks...!!! I need to generate qdisc statistics to show my 4 class (10, 20, 30, 40), i`ve all working with HTB and so on, but i need to graph this results e.gwith RRDTOOL. I found a script made in perl, that can to graph my 4 class, but i need to know which IP address on my LAN are using the bandwidth too, in other hand i need to classify the traffic by IP to show. This is an out of my

How To Installing tcng at slackware 10.1

Hello List, I''m new to QoS/tcng/HTB and friends, so please forgive me if my question might be silly... After having read lots of HowTo documents I''m totally confused... The Challenge: ============== I''ll have to deploy several "mirror" download servers (Linux) which must be able to handle a huge number of HTTP download requests (about 10k to 20k unicast

With the below script, whenever I ping 10.0.16.10 (which matches the only filter I have), traffic still get''s sent to the default 1:2 class instead of 1:1 and I don''t know why... Any hints? (kernel 2.6.12, iproute2-2.6.15) tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > /dev/null 2>&1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth0 classid 1:1 parent 1: htb rate

Hi anyone using sangoma hardware with lartc? pls let me know Thanks Imthiyaz Original Message: ----------------- From: lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:00:07 +0200 (CEST) To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: LARTC Digest, Vol 28, Issue 23 Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

hello people and nice to meet you. tasoss@starla:~/tcng$ ./configure Reading configuration defaults from ./config building tcsim: yes Kernel source: /home/tasoss/linux-2.6.16.20 Kernel version: 2.6.16 iproute2 source: /home/tasoss/iproute2-2.6.16-060323 iproute2 version: 060323 Host byte order: little endian tcng command: /home/tasoss/tcng/bin/tcng YACC is: