similar to: Network Routing

Hi, Apologies for the cross-posting; I''m not sure whether this is a firewall or routing issue, or both! I have four network cards, detailed below. eth0 and eth3 connect to my ISPs, and eth1 and eth2 connect to local networks. I want to route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and from eth1 to eth3. However, I am having a few problems with this. eth0 ip: 192.168.100.253/24 gw:

Hi, I am trying to set up a linux box to act as a router for my college. There are two different types of users; students and conference guests, and they have IPs statically assigned by DHCP, from separate ranges (but they are on the same subnet). The students go out onto an academic connection (via eth0), and conference guests go out on an ADSL line (via eth3). eth1 and eth2 are configured for

Hi, I have a simple question (well, at least I think it''s simple!). I have a router, with four Ethernet cards; eth0-eth3. eth0 and eth3 are the ''external'' cards, connecting to my ISPs. eth1 and eth2 are connected to my internal networks. What I want to do is basically filter all the traffic from one card to another, in this configuration: eth1 to eth3 eth2 to eth0

Hi all, I have the following problem. A Linux box configured as a bridge. One interface connects to the router via a crossover cable, the other connects to a switch via the cable that used to go to the router. Now I get the following: [root@localhost net]# ifconfig eth3 eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:2D:07:61:5D UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX

Hi! I have a problem with my new Xen setup. I have installed Debian etch with netinstall and I''m using 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 kernel in my dom0 and 3.0.3-0-4 version xen hypervisor. I''m using four network cards on my system and using three of them as xen bridges and dom0 is using the fourth one only for it''s own. So basicly both of my virtual servers use a network card

Hello, I've been trying to implement a bridge in place for a clustered firewall at one of our office locations. Currently we NAT two class C's internally. We decided, for performance reasons, that it would make sense to put our servers into an official DMZ. So we started this bridging project. Our goal is to have two redundant firewalls in place. There is no need for active/active.

xm list reveals the following information... Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console Domain-0 0 315 0 r---- 2058.1 Domain-1 11 342 0 -b--- 5.2 9611 Domain-2 12 342 0 -b--- 3.9 9612 Xen seems to be working beautifully but I have not yet figured out how to get Domain-0 to ping both Domain-1 and Domain-2,

I'm running into a situation where a bogus bonded interface named "bond0" is being created, in addition to the desired "bond2" interface. Can anyone confirm this? Anyone know why it's happening or what I do to get rid of it? I wanted to start my numbering scheme at 2 instead of 0, which I didn't think would be a problem. As you can see, I have no reference

Hi all, I'm trying to setup a cluster of 2 machines with Centos 5.2 to host a postfix+spamassassin+clamav+mailscanner service. Below cluster software versions rgmanager.i386 2.0.38-2.el5_2.1 installed cman.i386 2.0.84-2.el5_2.2 installed Every machine (hp blade server ) has 4 interfaces, bounded in this way: Eth0, eth1

I have a NetGear FV318 living in my DMZ, with one of its LAN-ports living in my LOC zone. What rules are needed in shorewall to allow a certain subnet to make connections to this device from the net zone? Do I define it as a tunnel in shorewall/tunnels, or do I just allow some selected traffic to the DMZ IP? I am not sure which of the docs are right for me in this case?

Hi List, I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided to not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3 were bonded (mode 1 ) after reboot the bond did not work. It came up OK but no data was passing through it. all other interfaces on the machine were working. I decided to remove the bond, so after removing the bond i was left with eth0

Le 13/05/2020 ? 02:13, Orion Poplawski a ?crit?: > On 5/12/20 2:46 AM, Patrick B?gou wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need some help with NFSv4 setup/tuning. I have a dedicated nfs server >> (2 x E5-2620? 8cores/16 threads each, 64GB RAM, 1x10Gb ethernet and 16x >> 8TB HDD) used by two servers and a small cluster (400 cores). All the >> servers are running CentOS 7, the

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi all, I just noticed that my two nics that are bonded via mode 0 are showing the same mac addy in ifconfig. Is this normal? In syslog I keep getting; kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address as source address Some guidance is appreciated before I dive in and troubleshoot. If I don't list the mac addy in my ifcfg-th# files, only one of the 2 nic comes up during boot.

Hello, We have 3 DSL connections connected to eth3 and another interface with a dedicated link in eth0 (main table) We want to balance selected traffic (using fwmark and iptables) through our 3 DSL connections in a secondary table named DSL (without using the dedicated link in eth0), but the next command is not accepted, and gives us the following error: # ip route add default

Hi, I managed to fix 128kbit for an IP address of 192.168.200.3 as below: - tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100mbit tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 128kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst 192.168.200.3 flowid 1:1 tc qdisc add dev eth3 parent 1:1 sfq perturb 10 How can I

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi, I''ve set up identical (what I think) machines using SLES 10 x86_64, but a new one of those is saying frequently in /var/log/messages: kernel: bond0: received packet with own address as source address A short summary of ifconfig looks like this: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 eth0

Hi! I have a setup where I want to prefer traffic on one port (for testing purposes I used port 22) my setup is : tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:7 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev

ok i will do it in text: 66.92.114.46 eth0 209.141.2.194 eth1 192.168.119.101 eth2 192.168.120.101 eth3 What i have is a linux box RH7.3 which will eventually run Shorewall Firewall. On this box there is eth0 66.92.114.46 conneted to isp1 and eth1 209.141.2.194 connected to isp2 It also has eth2 192.168.119.101 and eth3 192.168.120.101 which will connect to a failover appliance which has 2 wan