similar to: Connmark question

Hi.... I''m trying to setup a LAN router with P2P filter but the problem is that can''t "catch" Ares. There is a way to DROP "ares" p2p packets ? I''ve tried with last "ipp2p" snapshot without sucess... I''ve Kernel 2.4.28 iptables 1.3.0 Various Patches from patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 iproute2-ss020116 IMQ Patch Esfq Patch

Hey, one more question for ipp2p iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 7 iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p udp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK

Hello, I am trying to shape p2p trafik to 256kbps on my dsl line. I wrote this set of commands: DEV=eth2 ip link set imq0 up tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1:0 htb default 21 r2q 2 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 530kbit tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 530kbit ceil 530kbit prio 0 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 64kbit

Hi, I''ve a linux as router nat + firewall (POLICY DROP for INPUT OUTPUT and FORWARD) but, I''ve put next rules for p2p software on FORWARD chain [... snip ... ] iptables -F FORWARD iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT [... snip ... ] iptables -A FORWARD -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j ACCEPT iptables -A

Ok, earlier I post a message explaining my problem with HTB and layer7 (or ipp2p), about not being able to shape the traffic. Well, actually this is what''s happening, I''m marking the packets (right now, I''m using ipp2p as Klaus adviced me to) with iptables, and my queue rules are made using tcng, I''m using the HTB qdisc, and traffic is going to the HTB class

Hi! I''m wondering whether anyone has successfully set up a bandwidth control system using ipp2p and shorewall. I have been able to drop connecions altogether, but I don''t seem to be able to get CONNMARK working with ipp2p. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated :) ______________________________ Mario R. Pizzolanti

Hi, I want to classify with ipp2p packets that I''ve captured with tcpdump. I send the packets with tcpreply. I had to create a bridge interface in order to enable the listening interface in promiscous mode and to classify the traffic mirrored to that. In this mode the traffic pass through the prerouting chain of the mangle table (on bridge). I want to used connmark for recognized flows,

Does anyone here implement traffic shaping with shorewall? I need to shape BitTorrent traffic on my network so that upload/downloads do not overwhelm normal function or, even more importantly, my imminent conversion to VOIP for all telephone service. I followed the shorewall documentation guide but am not sure if what I have done is the Right Way Of Doing Things. Nor am I satsified with the

Hi all, I''m tring to isolate P2P traffic, specifically BitTorrent, for my QoS scripts. I can''t seem to completely isolate ALL BitTorrent traffic. I identify & mark packets and then use tc filters to put them into appropriate classes. My firewall rules (below) do the markings. My VoIP boxes'' and ICMP traffic get highest priority (mark 1). Then comes DNS, SSH,

Hello, its me again, I won''t stop sending emails to this list, until I solve this problem, I''ve tried several apps to create the right htb rules (even made them my self), but I always get the same results, traffic gets shaped, but I can''t use my bandwidth, and this is weird, because I should be able to, also I keep seeing download being limited too, and that

Hello everyone, I want an opinion from people who tryed different matching modules to match diferent types of traffic, especially p2p ones. I would like to hear which scales better as CPU usage and latency : ipp2p, iptables-p2p or l7-filter with the p2p patterns. I want to use one of them to block most of p2p (except maybe dc++ and emule which i want to shape). I would use the matching rules in

Greetings, I''ve searched, found ftwall, and some other commercial solutions, but am wondering if anyone on this list has any solutions using a linux firewall to block p2p traffic, more specifically Kazaa. Walter Wickersham _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I am trying to apply the new :T flag in tcrules. the man page for this file [1] sayas that if SOURCE is $FW then rules are applied in OUTPUT. this doesn''t seem to work on my setup. I have in tcrules : ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RESTORE:T 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 all - - - 0 CONTINUE:T 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0

Hello...I have a Slackware based machine doing routing & QoS for my internal LAN users... It has two interfaces: eth1(100mbps) that connects to the aDSL modem(USR 9105) and eth0(100mbps) that connects to my local LAN... I''am using shorewall as a firewall...i think it''s configured well as it''s working as i want and i pass all the online firewall tests... :D All lan

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

Hello there, I''m having lots of problems with my setup here. Let me explain: I am network administrator for my university dorm. We are about 300 users, and we have 2 ADSL connections doing load balancing with 300kbits upstream and 2Mbit downstream. The load balancing is working great, we are doing connection tracking so I can mark and hence prioritize interactive traffic and ACKS

Hello I''m trying to switch from IMQ to IFB but I have a problem with traffic marked by ipp2p module. Looks like when traffic is redirected from ethX to ifbX it looses information about MARK. Here''s what I do to get ingress traffic to go to ifb interface: $TC qdisc add dev eth1.42 ingress $TC filter add dev eth1.42 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \ match u32 0 0

Hello every body: I have RedHat fedora core 2 machine, using iptables and squid. I am having a lot of problems with peer2peer traffic. (bittorrent, kazaa, etc.) so I have installed ipp2p from rpm. Every thing was ok until I use iptables rules. I get this error. [root@router iptables]# iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j DROP iptables: No chain/target/match by that name sames

I saw this snippet from Daniel Chemko dchemko@smgtec.com Mon, 31 May 2004 09:30:43 -0700 # Egress marking (mostly for QOS operations) iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o ${if_inet} --dport 21 -j MARK --set-mark 0x111 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK

I have two (interconnected) questions: First of all, I''m trying to use IPP2P to classify my P2P traffic and give it a lower network priority. I''ve already successfully built IPP2P into iptables and the kernel. I read http://www.shorewall.net/IPP2P.html, but it''s confusing me. Using the documentation for normal tcrules in 3.0