similar to: Mongrel 0.3.13.4 Pre-Release -- Ruby's LEAK Fixed (Death To Mutex!)

Howdy Folks, This release is after painstaking analysis of a memory leak that was reported by Bradley Taylor, reduced by myself, and then fixed after much work. You should all thank Bradley for finding the bizarre fix. It turns out the Ruby has a memory leak when you use pretty much any thread locking primitive other than Sync (Mutex, Monitor, etc.): http://pastie.caboo.se/10194 The fix (for

Is this the behavior that supposedly indicates a problem with a particular action? Mongrel in development mode randomly hangs on random actions. Further requests cause USR1 logs like: Mon Sep 18 13:04:03 PDT 2006: 0 threads sync_waiting for /, 2 still active in mongrel. Mon Sep 18 13:07:52 PDT 2006: 1 threads sync_waiting for /public/stylesheets/table.css, 3 still active in mongrel. Mon Sep 18

Hello all, I''m attempting to test/tune a mongrel cluster according to the tuning instructions on the mongrel site (using httperf). Anecdotally, the site itself ''feels'' snappy, but testing it with httperf reveals what appears to be terrible throughput. I''m kind of at a loss to describe the results, and was hoping someone could verify that I''m testing

Hi Everyone, Just want to get out another ping on the Mongrel pre-release saga. I''ve updated a bunch of the documentation to include documents people have donated and to beef up the FAQ for most of the questions people have asked over the past month. INSTALL gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ CHANGES * Fixed memory leak by switching to Sync rather

Hi list, I''m seeing a couple of issues with Mongrel. I''m running FreeBSD 6.1 and have previously been told that there are known conflicts between this and Mongrel, yet I hope these issues will be resolved with time. I''m overloading Mongrel with httperf on my local workstation. Mongrel is started directly with the mongrel_rails command and there is only one mongrel

Hi all, Starting out with load testing for one of my rails apps and am pretty confused about what the ''best'' way to do this is. I read the tuning article at http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/how_many_mongrels.html but am getting some weird numbers from the tests recommended at the bottom: httperf --server www.theserver.com --port 80 --uri /tested --num-conns <10 second

[That subject line is of course a severe truncation!] I''ve got a REST request that works fine from curl but causes a mongrel error when executed from a Java program. This all worked with fine with rails 1.1.6 and webrick. I''m trying to update the app to rails 1.2.1 (I need working around_filters). I''m running in development mode with mongrel 1.01 running on macosx

Hello Everyone, I just posted another pre-release of Mongrel that fixes a bug which caused Mongrel to claim it was getting parsing errors because the QUERY_STRINGs were too long. In actuality it was shift in the parser that made empty queries (/test?) become negative. This is fixed up now. Here''s the full list of changes: * It has a couple of fixes for win32, but I still have to

I''m trying to do some initial benchmarking of our setup, mainly just to establish baselines. I''m essentially using the process Zed outlines in a previous message: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2006-May/000200.html What I''m running into is that Mongrel appears only half as fast as Apache when serving a small static HTML file. If I then add in Apache with

* cross posted to the mongrel mailing list* Hi, I''m running into a strange issue where one mongrel will sometimes develop hundreds of CLOSE_WAIT TCP connections, mostly to apache (I think -- see sample lsof output below). I haven''t had a chance to get the mongrel with this behavior into USR1 debug mode yet. I wrote a little loop below that will catch it next time. This

Hey Everyone, Topfunky (Geoffry) has created a great PeepCode screencast on using httperf to performance measure your web applications: http://nubyonrails.topfunky.com/articles/2007/03/05/peepcode-page-caching-and-httperf http://peepcode.com/products/benchmarking-with-httperf Topfunky put a ton of work into this and really got it right. The attention to detail is very good and he researched

I tried using the killall -USR1 mongrel_rails to check on a problem, and all I get is mongrel_rails: no process killed Nothing shows in the log. Any ideas? I''m using the latest pre-release, and a ''ps'' shows my cluster is running. Cheers, Brett

Hi, has anyone run httperf in Xen.if so cna you share the peformance. Also can someone please send me the source for this. the HP site that hosts it does not respond and i do see any other sites that have the source for httperf. Thanks PKrishna _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, Thanks Zed - this is very interesting. One item in particular caught my eye: Does anyone on this list have any comments or validation that Rails 1.2.1 is 2-4 times as slow as Rails 1.1.6? Topfunky provided a link that purports what looks like really horrible performance and memory characteristics for Rails 1.2.1, even v. 1.1.6:

Hi mongrel-users, This is my first post, so I''m not sure if it''s been asked before, but I can''t find an answer anywhere. If I have one rails application running, one processor I''m running it on, and mongrel is multi-threaded, why should I have more than one mongrel running? Everyone seems to agree on 3-5 mongrels per rails app, but why? I must be

Hello I have a small problem which I hope you can help with. We are running samba 2.2.8a on a V880 using Solaris 9. Up until today there were, as far as we know, no problems with the service. Today a change was done to add 6 additional shares to the system. This was done by editing the configuration file and issuing a kill -HUP to the samba service. All appeared to be OK until access was

I downloaded rsync from sunfreeware.com, installed the dependencies and installed rsync without error, however when I run it I get errors, see: # /usr/local/bin/rsync -a -A -h -u -p -e rsh --progress --rsh=/usr/bin/rsh root at 192.168.0.160:/usr/include . sh: /usr/local/bin/rsync: not found rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [Receiver] rsync error: error in rsync

Hello Folks, This is the big release of Mongrel that''s been in the works for a while now (well, like a week). It is chock full of changes and features, but mostly it syncs up the Win32 side of things, and validates that Edge Rails works without problems. It also features a more extensive and useful example of the GemPlugins called mongrel_config. First the usual stuff for people

Hello all Samba enthusiasts. I am a noob w.r.t. samba configuration and just happened to use it on Solaris systems by creating conf files using copy-paste :-). This is just to convey that I'm no advanced user and might need help with the solutions / alternatives to come. Some background => Here is my smb.conf: === [global] workgroup = <company domain> server string = Samba

On a Friday in 2020, Marcel Juffermans wrote: >Hi there, > >Since upgrading to openSUSE 15.2 (which includes libvirt 6.0.0) the >virtual guests don't get their RBD disks made available to them. On >openSUSE 15.1 (which includes libvirt 5.1.0) that worked fine. The XML >is as follows: > [...] >I tried to strace libvirtd. The results are as follows: > >On