similar to: iproute balancing trough virtual NIC

Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network

Hi. I´m making an script for load balancing of two cablemodems internet connections toward my LAN. The problem is that when I try to ''equalize'' the the two internet connections with the weight=1 it doesn´t work. On the other hand, if I put 5 and 5 it works, but not at 100%, it does intermittlently, some times works and others don´t. example: ip route add default equalize\

Hi, I have a linux-box with 3 eth, 2 of us go into 2 ISP. My localnet is masquerade with this rule: Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination SNAT all -- 10.0.0.0/16 anywhere to:211.56.233.186 SNAT all --

Greetings, I''m trying to set up some sort of load-balancing on a Linux (Trustix) gateway by using multipath routes, however I''m stuck with some problems. The idea is that this gateway (odd as it may seem) only has one external interface, which should route packets to two different gateways (Ciscos). The gateway''s external interface and the routers are all on the same

I am running 2.4.20 with Julian Anastasov''s patches (routes-2.4.20-9.diff), iptables v1.2.6a, iproute2-ss010824 on Debian. I have set up our internal gateway to multihome 2 T1''s as described in http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt . The only difference is that I use multiple IP''s on the external interfaces. EXA A.B.C.225 --------------------

Hi All, concerning the problem when running the "ip ru ls" command. I faced with the same problem, and I solved it by making sure to include the following settings into the kernel configuration (2.4.18): CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y <=== CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y <=== CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_NAT=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_TOS=y

Hello, I have a Compaq Proliant i850R, running RedHat 7.1. There are 3 NICs attached to it, 2 eepro100, and 1 ThunderLAN driver v1.14a. This box is being prepped to be a download server. GOAL: Requests are sent to each NIC via seperate IP addresses. All 3 are on the same subnet. All requests are load balanced via a DNS server. We want all requests to exit the same NIC that they entered. PROBLEM:

Hi, I am connected to two DSL providers (DSL 1 - 1Mbps downlink/384kbps uplink and DSL 2 - 2Mbps downlink/512kpbs uplink) I would like to only allow ftp, pop3 and http via the DSL 1 and only smtp, ipsec and pptp via DSL 2. How can I do so? Can I use iproute to route these protocols? Below is my ip routing: - # DSL 1 ip route add 2.2.2.208/30 dev eth0 src 2.2.2.210 table 1 ip route add

root ~ # ip route ls default 10.0.9.200 dev eth1 scope link 10.0.1.200 dev eth2 scope link 10.0.3.200 dev eth4 scope link 10.0.2.200 dev eth3 scope link default dev eth3 scope link root ~ # ip route ls table http default equalize nexthop dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop dev eth2 weight 1 root ~ # ip route ls table ssh default equalize nexthop dev eth1 weight 1

Hello lartc! I have strange problem setting load balancing over 4 interfaces. Something won''t accept more than 3 interfaces, While setting: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc2 weight 1 It''s ok: ip r l default nexthop dev pvc0

hi, I''ve encrountred some problem with iproute2... I''m building a router with kernel 2.4.20 but my script fail when I try to do a load balancing over a specific traffic, how explained on LARTC for balance the access between more link we should simple: ip route add default scope global nexthop via IP1 dev ETH0 weight 1 \ nexthop via IP2 dev ETH1 weight 1 for specific traffic

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

Hi, This is the first time I write to the list. My english is not so good, but I hope I''ll be understood. I have 4 adsl routers, plugged on a linux box, and this box e used to connect to a local network. The linux box has 5 NICs. eth0: local network inet 10.0.0.56/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global eth0 eth1: adsl router 1 inet 192.168.254.1/24 brd 192.168.254.255 scope global

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

I''m trying to connect to two ISPs the connections are as follows: Eth0 IP: 192.168.1.1 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth1 IP: 216.167.217.241 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth2 IP: 216.167.208.40 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Here are the commands to set things up: #Load modules insmod /lib/modules/2.6.19.2- pyramid.metrix.net/kernel/net/ipv4/multipath_drr.ko insmod /lib/modules/2.6.19.2-

I''m trying to connect to two ISPs the connections are as follows: Eth0 IP: 192.168.1.1 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth1 IP: 216.167.217.241 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth2 IP: 216.167.208.40 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Here are the commands to set things up: #Load modules insmod /lib/modules/2.6.19.2- pyramid.metrix.net/kernel/net/ipv4/multipath_drr.ko insmod

I have two internet lines and I want to do equal cost loadbalancing on the two uplinks to the internet. This is what I do: ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add default via 200.200.200.254 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add 100.100.100.0/24 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add default via 100.100.100.254 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 src 200.200.200.1 dev eth2

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | | x eth1 (63.43.x.x)

Specifying a source for the multipath route solved the problem. > ip rule add priority 200 table multi should be ip rule add prio 200 from $INT_NET table multi > ip route add default table multi proto static \ > nexthop via $EXB_GW dev $EXB_IF weight 1 \ > nexthop via $EXA_GW dev $EXA_IF weight 1 g

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches /w support for multipath routing Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | |