similar to: Wrong src addr is pkts

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1032 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arturo.borrero.glez at gmail.c | |om ---

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1032 Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fw at strlen.de Assignee|pablo at netfilter.org |fw at strlen.de --- Comment #2 from Florian

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1032 Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

Hi guys. I've always try to leave as mush as possible to the kernel but here I had to resort to source/rule based routing and I wonder why. Any expert cared to share some light on what is (not)happening here HOME -- tunnel --> public iface SHED gw? A iface; B iface <-- to respectively --> SOME box A iface; B iface HOME can get to both A & B ifaces, (which are different

Hi, I''ve got 2 lines from two diffrent ISP''s, one is a leased line and another a DSL line, I route certain ips over the DSL line for faster access and would like email to go over the leased line as it has a static ip and is our sending mailserver ip I would like to send mail to the same ips that is routed over DSL via the leased line, otherwise my server gets blacklisted with

Hi Guys, I have tried every single rule I could into iptables but I can't register this VPS to a provider Spikko. Finally I did an iptable accept on INPUT, OUTPUT, and FORWARD, for ports 0:65000 just to test things and still I can't register to the provider. I can easily register to another provider which uses port 5060 and I can make calls. But sip show registry only show Request Sent

After doing some system work, including upgrading the Samba server to 3.0.28a from 3.0.24, upgrading the kernel to 2.6.24, and changing the firewall rulesk, the XP workstations which belong to that domain, the right click "run as ..." option is slow to bring up a dialog. The phenotype is this: right click some program (for instance, a shortcut to the "command prompt")

Hello. I'm getting trouble with the ADMINISABSENTMINDED option, it doesn't seem to work as stated in the manual. When using the default ADMINISABSENTMINDED=Yes and no routestopped file, here are the firewall state after executing shorewall stop : Chain INPUT (policy DROP 473 packets, 106K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

Hello, I''m having some problems I can''t see trying to configure two network cards. I have eth0 and eth1. On eth0 I have 10.1.1.1.1 ON eth1 I have 192.168.2.250 After my script runs I can ping the 10.1.1.0/24 network but not the 192.168.2.0/24 network. 192.168.2/24 is network un-reachable .... Hmmm ... Can you check over my 6 commands below and see where my problem is? Many

Hi, I have a default class for my un-marked traffic (prio 5) and a prio 0 class for the important stuff, but I do not understand why my download traffic is duplicated in both. It work fine for my upload traffic (same setting except the red class but I have the same result if I create an esfq instead). Any comments/information will be appreciated. Below my config : tc commands from my scirpt :

Hi All, I have been using Samba 4.15 on CentOS 6.3 64 bit for last 3 months with no issues but suddenly there i am facing below issues. 1. Windows 7 Pro/Ultimate cannot join the domain, but can telnet all the port. 2. Shared resources on Server 2003 which is added to domain is available some time and some time not. For isolating the issue I have temporary removed the server from Domain the

Hi Is there a way of marking packets by mac address instead of ip or ports using a "tc filter u32 match"? I read somewhere that I could use the offset -8 and -14 to grab the mac addresses but if I use anything lower than -8, for example -9, I get an error. I''m modifying the wondershaper script to cap the download speed by mac address. Any sugestions?

I have an ADSL router, a linux box with two NICS connected to the router and another PC connected to the router. I installed shorewall using the two interface method. I can ping and see the webserver on the linux box from the local network, but not from the internet. Sys info as follows: [root@wilma root]# shorewall version 1.4.6b [root@wilma root]# ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu

You probably need to also enable auth_debug=yes auth_verbose=yes also, are you sure you just don't have wrong password? Aki On 01.02.2018 12:08, yuryb wrote: > I have added "auth_debug_password=yes" to "10-logging.conf" and > restarted dovecot.?But I do not see any information about the password > in the logs. Does this mean that the thunderbird does not

I have added "auth_debug_password=yes" to "10-logging.conf" and restarted dovecot.?But I do not see any information about the password in the logs. Does this mean that the thunderbird does not send the password??Although it asks for the password and I enter one. New log: dovecot: master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=19769 uid=0 code=kill) dovecot: master: Dovecot

I have a data frame in wide format. There are six variables that represent two factors in long format 3x2, Valence and Temperature: > head(dpts) File Subj Time Group PainNeg.hot PainNeg.warm SociNeg.hot SociNeg.warm Positiv.hot Positiv.warm Errors 1 WB101_1_1_dp.txt 101 1 MNP 30.700000 13.75000 16.319048 35.166667 30.18333 14.383333 1 2

Hi, i have a problem concerning my previous shorewall installation. I tried to use shorewall to configure my firewall, but i couldn''t get NAT to work. So i decided to remove shorewall and tried it with plain iptables. This is now working for me but everytime when i start my network connection it seems that my handmade iptable rules are overwritten. I have to manually run my

Believe me: Read the FAQ Checked over and over This might be toooooo stupid to be documented. Please bear with me. Any help ? Situation: single card standalone "firewall" (used like a "personal firewall"). Have sshd running on the FW. Want the sshd daemon to be accessible only from 2 LANs: 1) My other home LAN machine 2) IBM intranet machines (9.0.0.0) Whatever I have

Maybe this is the right place to ask? Thanks again, Daniel Begin forwarded message: > From: Daniel Schaffrath <daniel.schaffrath@mac.com> > Date: 21 July 2007 11:01:01 GMT+02:00 > To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org > Subject: PFIFO to contain more pkts than allowed by TCP peer? > > Hello everybody, > > when the one and only connection originating my box is a TCP stream

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=488 Summary: Chain/Groupings of networks don't total pkts and bytes correctly Product: iptables Version: 1.2.11 Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables