similar to: Will this work?

Hello! I''ve put some questions on this list some weeks ago and I''ve got good answers. Thank you! Now I''ve finished my (beautyful) script and I ran it on my router... About my script: It routes packages based on their destination on the Internet. I have about 1650 preffered destination networks listed in some file. The script read this file and marks every package for

Hi! I built some rules to shape traffic from my linux router in both dirrections: to the Internet and to the LAN. When i apply the rules my computer cannot acces the Internet or the LAN. Is this behavior normal? Do I need to write some rules for local IPs of my router? (I have sevaral, both on the internal and the external NICs.) Thank you for any advice! Sorin.

Hello all.. i''m a newbie in LARTC... And I reallize that my problem is a clasical problem in this LARTC milist..... So if anyone dont mind.. please help me with this... Situation : LAN --> Gateway <-- Internet 10.0.0.0/8 --> eth0 eth1<-- 20.0.0.0/8 Linux Box: RedHat 8.0 /sbin/tc size is +- 700 kb #NAT to all computer to access

Hello lartc maintainers and users! I have a router with two NICs. One NIC is connected to the Internet and the other to my internal LAN. I made a script for priorizing interactive traffic. The script matches TOS Minimize-Delay for priorizing interactive trafic, and fwmark for metropolitan packets. I have two root classes (simulating two circuits) : 1:1 for internet and 1:3 for metropolitan.

Hi all. I have a bridge running Linux 2.4.24 that I use as a bandwidth manager on a broadband wireless network. I''m using HTB and SFQ to prioritize that share bandwidth on a per-cell basis. My IP tables rules divide the traffic based on IPand traffic type (using layer-7 filter and ipp2p). My goal is to make sure that p2p traffic on the network doesn''t sink all of the

I''ve done some tests with TC FILTER and his PRIO and think that is an error or OMISION on TC FILTER DOCUMENTATION from: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html#AEN1100 Let''s say we have a PRIO qdisc called ''10:'' which contains three classes, and we want to assign all traffic from and to port 22 to the highest priority band, the filters would be:

PROBLEM: My filtering rules don''t seem to be working in the latest incarnation of my shaping script. I''ve changed from using multiple HTB classes to just one and a PRIO qdisc, and now my filters don''t seem to have any effect. OVERVIEW: What I used to have is pretty much the same as the htb wondershaper script (with some tweaks), which worked fine, but I noticed that my

Hi, this is a followup to "Problem with HTB and ceil", the problem with the ceiling has been resolved, thanks to the memebers on this m/g. Now I have the problem that packets get into the correct classe with the correct marks but the prios are not respected. I have 4 different classes: 1. voip class / prio 0 / mark 100 / voip traffic 2. ACK class / prio 1 / mark 200 / ACK packets to

Hi! I have configured traffic shaping with htb and imq but when i am downloading the latency for example on the Bnet class is very high ..... example: 65 kb/s download best latency: 56ms lateny on bnet class while downloading: 400 350 250 350 400 100 300 200 80 200 300 250 ..... To get informations about latency i am marking ping packets with iptables. I want to play during other users

Hi, complete newb and I apologise for it. I have a setup where my linux box has multiple broadband connection where I am routing certain things over certain interfaces, currently 2 links eth2 is a 1500/256 and eth3 is a 512/512, eth0 is the link to the LAN for users. What I am trying to do is traffic shape the information going out eth0 to the local users by the interface the traffic arrived

Hi all. I''ve written a small htb script that uses U32 and FW (marked by IPTABLES) filters, but TC doesn''t seem to be using the "cls_fw.o" module !!! I''m using redhat v9.0, kernel 2.4.8-20, iproute 2.4.7-7. Here is my script: ========================================================== ##################### #Interface definition #####################

Greetings, I have been reading the list for a little while now, but this is the first occasion I have had to post--of course, because of a problem. My problems began when I upgraded my RedHat 9 system to 2.6.10 from source. Aside from some other booting issues and things, all of which appear to be resolved, the only things NOT working are my scripts for traffic control. I get a whole host of

Hi stef and all I want measure the policy perfomance for video traffic on mpls diffserv network. there are two different polices for video packet 1. Video packets that are marked that are over the limit are to be rejected at the edge router. 2. Video packets that are marked that are over the limit are to be downgraded as best effort and are sent through. Before video enter my mpls

hi everybody. im trying to set up an QoS config, using layer7 (http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/) for protocol detection. im suposing 3 clients with this configuration: 3 clients: 1.2.3.1 , 1.2.3.2 , 1.2.3.3 1.2.3.1 has 256kbit bandwidth "guaranteed" clients 1.2.3.2 and 1.2.3.3 has 256kbit bandwith so im marking every packet using layer7 iptables module, classifying them in three

Hi Guys, I have a couple of problems that are driving me nuts. This is the script I am using to setup restirctions and bw limitations: #Adding root class. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 &>/dev/null tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit ceil 100Mbit burst 2k quantum 1536 tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 10 &>/dev/null tc

I have a wireless internet connection.the nat is done by linux machine. eth0----lan eth1---service-provider now the script.. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbps ceil 512kbps tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 384kbps ceil 512kbps-----Admin-Network tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb

Greetings - I''m new to QoS, so please be gentle (and yes, I''ve RTFM, though I don''t understand every bit of it) Here''s the thing; I''ve tried several scripts--simple and complex--for classifying my Vonage traffic into a high-priority queue, but no matter what I do it doesn''t seem to work. Right now I''m using the HTB script

Salut lartc (lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl), 18:12:52 kernel HTB init, kernel part version 3.10 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100001 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100002 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100003 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100004 is small. Consider r2q change.

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Hi Recently I upgraded my kernel to 2.6.11 (debian) and applied some patches from pom-ng (netfilter) and the iproute2-ss050330 package I have been experiencing a lot of crashes in the kernel (snip below) ================================== Apr 5 20:00:21 sydlxfw01 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000221 Apr 5 20:00:21 sydlxfw01 kernel: printing eip: