Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Full hashing filter sample"
2005 Dec 04
3
Shaping per machine
I''m trying to shape each machine on an interface to 256k each, but I''m
getting stuck and only able to shape an entire interface to 256k. What
should I be doing differently here?
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100MBit ceil 100MBit
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 110:
2005 Dec 08
0
Keeping state for multiple default routes
I have a machine with two routes to the internet doing load balancing on
the connections and NAT for internal machines. For inbound ssh connections
and outbound connections to anything, it will occasionally "lose" packets.
If I Control-C out of ssh and try again, it usually works, but not always.
After a few tries it does connect, but frequently stalls and hangs
permanently. I did
2003 Oct 10
3
Grandstream wallmount??
Am I the only one that has noticed there is no way to wallmount a
Grandstream phone? There are screw notches on the back, but no hook to
hold the handset in.
--
Dave Weis "I believe there are more instances of the abridgment
djweis@sjdjweis.com of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent
encroachments of those in power than by violent
2003 Jun 14
1
Cisco 7960 config?
I finally got the power supply for my 7960 and am having problems getting
it working. What should be in sip.conf and the SIP(macaddr).cnf file?
This is what I have in SIP0002FD3BA8F7.cnf
# SIP Configuration Generic File
# Line 1 appearance
line1_name: Asterisk Test
# Line 1 Registration Authentication
line1_authname: "phone1"
# Line 1 Registration Password
line1_password:
2005 Jul 24
2
TNT and SIP problem
I'm trying to get inbound calls from a TNT working but get 407 errors from
the TNT. This is what I have in sip.conf:
[maxtnt]
type=friend
host=x.x.x.x
dtmfmode=rfc2833
callerid="MaxTNT" <maxtnt>
context=demo
qualify=yes
disallow=all
allow=g729
allow=ulaw
insecure=very
This is what the TNT is spitting out:
Jul 24 14:55:12 tnt1 1/17: Releasing
2003 Oct 03
2
Transfer from IAX call
I am using IAX to send a call to my cell phone. I want to be able to hit #
and transfer it back into the office. I have added tTr to the dial command
and hitting # prompts me for the transfer, but after I start dialing 103,
it stops at 1 and tries to transfer it within nufone instead of my
dialplan. This is the debug output:
-- Called me@NuFone/1515480XXXX
-- Call accepted by
2003 Sep 26
1
ATM support?
Is there any interest in having ATM support for the various digium T1
cards?
dave
--
Dave Weis "I believe there are more instances of the abridgment
djweis@sjdjweis.com of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent
encroachments of those in power than by violent
and sudden usurpations."- James Madison
2003 Nov 14
3
Fax over SIP alaw/ulaw
Should I expect a standard fax machine connected to an ata-188 connected
to an asterisk server, connected to a pri fed from a cisco 7206vxr to work
correctly? It needs to have a standard fax machine, receiving and emailing
it won't be acceptable.
Thanks
dave
--
Dave Weis "I believe there are more instances of the abridgment
djweis@sjdjweis.com of the freedom of the
2005 Feb 20
1
Adtran Total Access MGCP Config?
I've never set up an mgcp device before. I have an Adtran IAD with the
MGCP firmware on it. I have it configured in mgcp.conf like this:
[general]
port = 2427
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0
[adtran]
host = 192.168.2.2
context = default
canreinvite = no
line => aaln/1
line => aaln/2
The device is configured like this:
MGCP Configuration | Standard MGCP 0.1 / NCS 1.0
MGCP Endpoint
2003 Oct 30
1
SIP NAT
Should it work to have a multi-homed asterisk server with grandstream
phones on the internal network and another grandstream phone on the
internet and be able to call between them? I set the bindaddr to the
external IP and pointed the internal and external grandstream phones to
that address. The signalling works fine to call between phones, but when
you pick up the ringing phone you get a
2003 Dec 24
0
amaflags question
I am trying to configure cdr on a system. We are using nufone and I have
set amaflags=billing on both of their sections in iax.conf. Incoming
nufone calls show up in cdr with billing, but outgoing calls still show
documentation. What do I need to change? We have a handful of SIP phones,
1 X100P outside line for local, and the rest is via nufone. I don't want
inter-system calls to be
2004 Sep 07
0
T100P problem with LD T1
I've got a dedicated LD T1 terminating to a DMS100 switch. My outgoing
calls aren't working, on the switch side they see two sets of dialing,
with the first three digits repeating. I've used the sample
extensions.conf modified a bit to remove the 9 and the 1, like so:
[trunkld]
exten => _NXXNXXXXXX,1,Monitor(wav,/tmp/dial)
exten =>
2005 Oct 12
0
u32 hashing filter - deletion problem!
Hi there,
I''m having a bit of a headache because of the u32 filter with hashing... My router administration system updates filter configuration differentially. Therefore I need to delete filters sometimes. I know that by deleting root class I''d make all filters go away, but I can''t use that option in this particular case.
When I delete even a single u32 hashed filter I
2019 Jul 29
0
[PATCH v4 0/5] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
> changes.
> While I was testing the v2 of this series I discovered an huge use of memory,
> so I added patch 1 to mitigate this issue. I put it in this series in order
> to better track the performance trends.
Series:
Acked-by: Michael S.
2019 Jul 30
0
[PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
> changes.
> While I was testing the v2 of this series I discovered an huge use of memory,
> so I added patch 1 to mitigate this issue. I put it in this series in order
> to better track the performance trends.
>
> v5:
> - rebased
2019 Jul 30
1
[PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:54:53AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
> > changes.
> > While I was testing the v2 of this series I discovered an huge use of memory,
> > so I added patch 1 to mitigate this issue. I put it in this
2019 May 13
0
[PATCH v2 0/8] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On 2019/5/10 ??8:58, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> While I was testing this new series (v2) I discovered an huge use of memory
> and a memory leak in the virtio-vsock driver in the guest when I sent
> 1-byte packets to the guest.
>
> These issues are present since the introduction of the virtio-vsock
> driver. I added the patches 1 and 2 to fix them in this series in order
> to
2013 Jul 09
1
rsync speed limited by read chunk size?
Is rsync speed limited to 160MB/sec read speeds due to the chunk read
size? Or, are we seeing just a coincidence and the limitation is
somewhere else?
Rsync (single process) is used to locally copy files from one raid
partition to another and we noticed rsync's read speed is limited.
Whether I setup an rsync between two raid disks or two ram drives,
rsync reads top out at around 160MB/sec.
2019 Apr 08
0
[PATCH RFC 0/4] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On 2019/4/4 ??6:58, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
> changes:
> - patch 1/4: reduces the number of credit update messages sent to the
> transmitter
> - patch 2/4: allows the host to split packets on multiple buffers,
> in this way, we can remove the packet size limit to
>
2019 Apr 04
0
[PATCH RFC 0/4] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:47:15PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:52:46AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I simply love it that you have analysed the individual impact of
> > each patch! Great job!
>
> Thanks! I followed Stefan's suggestions!
>
> >
> > For comparison's sake, it could be IMHO benefitial to add a