similar to: is it possible? (fixed pic)

Hi People, I have a quick question, which hopefully you will have an answer to. I am slowly moving towards puppet and git with multiple branches for different environments. Things are going pretty well, but now I have a small issue. The question is where should I store sensitive files, for instance SSL private keys or some files which contain sensitive data? I am aware of hiera-gpg storage

Hi everyone, I currently have a giant file with default variables I use in a lot of my modules and I override those at the node level if I need to. I thought I would give porting that data into a hiera setup. I worked out how to specify my data sources and started to make a go at moving some of my variables in the default data file. I thought heira would be smart and set a variable to undef if

I wonder if PuppetLabs will work with Amazon to try to add Puppet as an option to OpsWorks as well ? I don''t think people using Puppet with AWS in a stable fashion would try to move to OpsWorks and migrate everything to Chef, but new customers/startups would think twice in choosing Puppet if the service offered in AWS OpsWorks is based on Chef. I haven''t tried OpsWorks yet,

Hi People, I am setting up a new dovecot server for testing first prior production upgrade from 1.2.x to 2.0.x. I used the RPMs from ATrpms: dovecot-2.0.0-1_117.el5.x86_64.rpm The errors I am getting: ----------------------------- Aug 27 18:15:29 testbox dovecot: auth: Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib64/dovecot/auth Aug 27 18:15:29 testbox dovecot: auth: Debug: Module loaded:

I'm very confused on the right step to use to setup a modified kernel in centOS6. As a simple user, I've downloaded the latests sources (I'm runing an old kernel version) : rpm -i http://vault.centos.org/6.7/updates/Source/SPackages/kernel-2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.src.rpm in the spec file ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec I've set: %define buildid .numa Now I want to set

Hi People, Let''s imagine a scenario where I have multiple nodes, a very simple hierarchy: - nodes/%{fqdn} - roles/%{role} - common So what I am trying to achieve is for instance a class ''foo'' is always included in ''common.yaml'' and all the nodes will have that class included by default, but I want a specific node to have that class excluded or

Hello, Philipp Becker and me, Vaidas Gasiunas, are developers at SAP and part of a team developing a C-like domain-specific language for the SAP HANA in-memory database. We use LLVM as a backend to translate our language to native code, primarily on x86-64 platforms. Our programs are created dynamically, compiled and optimized in a running database. As a result of that we have special

Hi Andy, > I would think you could use a simple allocation scheme on the host side and then allocate a single block (or perhaps one code block and one data block) in the target process to receive everything, since everything is loaded on the host before you need to copy it to the target process. But perhaps I'm missing something regarding your particular scenario. > In any event,

On Dec 12, 2013, at 04:25 , Gasiunas, Vaidas <vaidas.gasiunas at sap.com> wrote: > To address these requirements we have developed a set of patches improving performance and malfunction safety of certain compiler passes and would be interested in contributing them at some point. Before proposing concrete changes, we would like to know what the general interest is with respect to making

>> To increase stability for us we have already moved the main part of the compilation to a separate process that may crash in case of an error without doing much harm, i.e. does not crash the database. > Were there any interesting challenges that arose during this process? > This seems to be an approach many folks are either taking or > considering. If there are things we could

Some time ago we reported a compile-time performance regression in the LiveIntervals analysis pass (see http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18580). We detected it at first after migrating from LLVM 3.1 to 3.3, but the problem persists also in 3.5. This regression is especially critical when compiling long functions. In one of our benchmarks compile time goes from 200s (in 3.1) up to 1500s (in

Hi, i'm not subscribed to the list so could you please Cc back to me :) Just discovered this problem today when my brother tried to change his password. Windows sat there and eventually said that my domain couldn't be found or something, this seemed very odd so I had a look in the logs and got this show up... Apr 27 21:21:42 bone smbd[496]: [2003/04/27 21:21:42, 0]

Hi Philip, Thanks for the positive response from all of you! > One question: How are you handling EOM? Error return? Custom region allocator? When running into an Out-of-memory situation we're currently only doing an error return, i.e. the compilation fails, but does so without crashing the process in which the compilation/jitting occurs. It is ok for us if llvm returns with a

Hello to everyone, Here is the situation: [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\ | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet] [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/ Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24. So I need: LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other. LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24). All LANs have to get only internet. How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?

On 12/12/13 4:25 AM, Gasiunas, Vaidas wrote: > Hello, > > Philipp Becker and me, Vaidas Gasiunas, are developers at SAP and part of a team developing a C-like domain-specific language for the SAP HANA in-memory database. We use LLVM as a backend to translate our language to native code, primarily on x86-64 platforms. Our programs are created dynamically, compiled and optimized in a

Hey, one more question for ipp2p iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 7 iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p udp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK

Hey guys, I''ve just built a sparc64 (Ultra/5) based firewall with ipp2p compiled as a module and I''m constantly getting the following message in my logs: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[100f8490] search_all_edk+0x20/0x4c [ipt_ipp2p] I''m running the following versions: - Kernel 2.6.22 - ipp2p 0.8.2-r4 - iptables 1.3.8-r1 Any thoughts?

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Philipp Becker" <philipp.becker at sap.com> > To: "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com>, "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 6:55:59 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Making LLVM safer in out-of-memory situations > > Hi Philip, > > Thanks for the

Hey, I have such a script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1:0 htb default 21 r2q 2 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:11 htb rate 100mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:21 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:23 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 1024kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:25 htb rate 3072kbit

Is it possible to negate the "match" to the ip? I want to match all traffic to dport 80 NOT going to dst 1.2.3.4: $TC filter add dev ${DEV_IFB} parent 1:0 prio 2 protocol ip u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff \ match ip dport 80 0xffff \ match ip dst 1.2.3.4/32 \ classid 1:14 I can''t find it in the docs. I tried "!" "\!" and "not" in several